Stebbing ARD.Hormesis - the Stimulation of Growth by Low Levels of Inhibitors . The Science of the Total Environment1982; 22: 213-234 .
2.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LA.The Dose Determines the Stimulation (and Poison): Development of a Chemical Hormesis Database . International Journal of Toxicology1997; 16: 545-559 .
3.
Teeguarden JG , Dragan Y , Pilot HC.Implications of Hormesis on the Bioessay and Hazard Assessment of Chemical Carcinogens . BELLE Newsletter1998; 6: 8-13 .
4.
Mazur A.Opposition to Technological Innovation . Minerva1975; 13: 58-81 .
5.
Mazur A.The Dynamics of Technical Controversy. Communication PressWashington DC1981.
6.
Renn O.Mental Health, Stress and Risk Perception. In: JV Lake , GR Bock and G Cardew (eds), Insights from Psychological Research. Health Impacts of Large Releases of Radionuclides, Ciba Foundation Symposium 203. Wiley, London , 1997. pp 205-231.
7.
Chaiken S , Stangor C.`Attitudes and Attitude Change'Annual Review of Psychology1987; 38: 575-630 .
8.
Petty RE , Cacioppo E.The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology1986; 19: 123-205 .
9.
Renn O , Levine D.`Trust and Credibility in Risk Communication.' In: Kasperson R and Stallen PJ (eds), Communicating Risk to the Public1991. Dordrecht, Kluwer , pp 175-218.
10.
Kahneman D , Tversky A.Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk . Econometrica1979; 47: 263-291 .
11.
Ross LD.The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. In: Berkowitz L (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.10. pp 172-220Random House, New York , 1997.
12.
and Risk Abstracts1990; 7: 1-9 (Part 2).
13.
Drottz-Sjöberg B-M , Persson L.Public Reaction to Radiation: Fear, Anxiety or Phobia?Health Physics1993; 64: 223-231 .
14.
Slovic P.Perception of Risk from Radiation . Radiation Protection Dosimetry1996; 68: 165-180 .
15.
Renn O. Risikowahrnehmung: Psychologishe Determinanten bei der intuitiven Erfassung und Bewertung von Risiken. In: Hosemann G (ed), Risiko in der Industriegesellschaft: Analyse, Vorsorge, Akzeptanz. pp 167-192 Erlanger Universitätsverlag, Erlangen, 1989.
16.
Kraus N , Malmfors T , Slovic P.Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks . Risk Analysis1992; 12: 215-232 .
17.
Sjöberg L.Perceived Risk versus Demand for Risk Reduction. RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 18. Stockholm, Sweden, Center for Risk Research: Stockholm School of Economics , 1994.
18.
Rohrmann B.Risk Perception Research: Review and Documentation. Studies in Risk Communication No. 48. Jülich, Research Center, Germany , 1995.
19.
Slovic P , Fischhoff B , Lichtenstein S. In: Royal Society (ed), Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A376. pp 17-34. Royal Society, London : 1981.
20.
Slovic P.Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychomatic Paradigm. In: Krimsky S and Golding D (eds), Social Theories of Risk. pp 117-152Westport: Praeger , 1992.
21.
Tanaka Y.Risk Perception: Analyzing Images and Fears. In: Dinkel R , Horrisberger B , Tolo KW (eds), Improving Drug Safety - A Joint Responsibility. 213-225, Berlin, Springer , 1991.
22.
Lee TR.The Public Perception of Risk and the Question of Irrationality. In: Royal Society of Great Britain (ed), Risk perception, Vol. 376 1981. The Royal Society, London : pp 5-16.
23.
Slovic P.Perception of Risk . Science1987; 236: 280-285 .
24.
Vlek CAJ , Stallen PJ.Judging Risks and Benefits in the Small and in the Large . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance1981; 28: 235-271 .
25.
Gould LC.Perceptions of Technological Risks and Benefits. New York: Russel Sage Foundation . 1988.
26.
Conference Proceedings of the Conference on Assessment and Perception of Risk to Human Health, September 1982. pp 135-155 .
27.
Otway H , Thomas K.Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy . Risk Analysis1982; 2: 69-82 .
28.
Sjöberg L.Risk Sensitivity, Attitude and Fear as Factors in Risk Perception . Paper at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis-Europe. Manuscript. Stockholm, June 1997.
29.
Festinger L.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press . 1957.
30.
Clarke L.Acceptable Risk: Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley, CA: SAGE Publications . 1989.
31.
Colligan MJ , Pennebaker J , Murphy LR.Mass Psychogenic Illness. New York, Hillsdale . 1982.
32.
Aurand K, Hazard B, Tretter F. Umweltbelastungen und Ä ngste. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 1993.
33.
Drottz-Sjöberg B-M , Sjöberg L.Risk Perception and Worries after the Chernobyl Accident . Journal of Environmental Psychology1990; 10: 135-149 .
34.
Davidoff LL.Models of Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS) Syndrome: Using Empirical Data (Especially Interview Data) to Focus Investigations . Toxic Industr Health1992; 6: 229-247 .
35.
Sielken RL , Stevenson DE.Some Implications for Quantitative Risk Assessment if Hormesis Exists . BELLE Newsletter1998; 6: 13-17 .
36.
Douglas M , Wildavsky A.Risk and Culture. Berkeley, CA, SAGE Publications .
37.
Schwarz M , Thompson M.Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia . 1990.