Anderson D., Russell T. 'The Status of Alternative Methods in Toxicology'. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 1995.
2.
Fentem JR, et al. In vitro toxicology studies with keratinocytes. Comments Toxicology1994; 5: 225-246.
3.
Osborne R., Perkins MAAn approach for development of alternative test methods based on mechanisms of skin irritation. Food and Chemical Toxicology1994; 32: 133-142.
4.
Gad SCAlternatives to in vivo studies in toxicology. In: General and Applied Toxicology, B Ballantyne, T Marrs and P Turner (Eds.), pp. 179-206, Macmillan Press, London, 1993.
5.
Balls M., et al. Development and validation of non-animal tests and testing strategies: the identification of a coordinated response to the challenge and the opportunity presented by the Sixth Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive (76/ 768/EEC) . Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1995 ; 23: 398-409.
6.
Balls M., et al. The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology In Vitro1995; 9: 871-929.
7.
Chan PK, Hayes AWAcute toxicity and eye irritancy. In: AW Hayes (Editor), 'Principles and Methods of Toxicology' , Third Edition, Raven Press, New York, pp. 579-647, 1994.
8.
York M., Wilson AP, Newsome CSThe classification of soluble silicates for eye hazard using the enucleated rabbit eye test. Toxicol in Vitro1994; 8: 1265-1268.
9.
Lupke NPHen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food ChemicalToxicology1985; 34: 291-296.
10.
Gautheron P. , et al. Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicology in Vitro1994; 8: 381-392.
11.
Prinsen MKThe chicken enucleated eye test (CEET): a practical (pre) screen for the assessment of eye irritation/corrosion potential of test materials. Food and Chemical Toxicology1996; 34: 291-296.
12.
Anonymous.Home Office guidelines on eye irritation tests, In: Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1994, HMSO, London , 1994.
13.
Lewis RW, Botham PAMeasurement of transcutaneous electrical resistance to assess the skin corrosivity potential of chemicals. In: In Vitro Skin Toxicology. Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitisation. Alernative Methods in Toxicology Vol. 10, A Rougier, AM Goldberg and HI Mailbach, pp. 161-169, Mary Ann Liebert, New York, USA, 1994.
14.
Rougier A., et al. The use of in vitro methods in the ocular irritation assessment of cosmetic products. Toxicology In Vitro1994; 8: 893-905.
15.
Lee JC, et al. A protein kinase involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine biosynthesis. Nature1994; 372: 739-746.
16.
Shivji GM, Gupta AK, Sauder DNRole of cytokines in irritant contact dermatitis. In: In Vitro Skin Toxicology. Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitisation. Alternative Metheds in Toxicology Vol. 10, A Rougier, AM Goldberg, and HI Mailbach, pp. 13 - 22, Mary Ann Liebert, New York, USA, 1994.
17.
Whalen E., Donnelly TA, Naughton G., Rheins LAThe development of three-dimensional in vitro tissue models. Human and Experimental Toxicology1994; 13: 853-859.
18.
Howes D., et al. Methods for assessing percutaneous absorption. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1996; 24: 81-106.
19.
Hotchkiss Sam.Cutaneous toxicity-Kinetic and metabolic determinants . Toxicology and Ecotoxicology News1995; 2: 10-18.
20.
Patrick E., Maibach H.Dermatotoxicology. In: AW Hayes (Editor), Principles and Methods of Toxicology Third Edition, Raven Press, New York, pp. 767-803, 1994.
21.
Balls M., et al. Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures . Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1995 ; 23: 129-147.
22.
Botham PA, et al. A prevalidation study on in vitro skin corrosivity testing . Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1995 ; 23: 219-255.
23.
OECD. Acute Eye Irritation.OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, test guideline 405, OECDParis, 1987.
24.
Fielder RJ, et al. Hierarchical approach to the assessment of dermal and ocular irritancy: a report by the British Toxicology Society Working Party on Irritancy . Human Toxicology1987; 6: 269-278.
25.
Lewis RW, McCall JC, Botham PAUse of an in vitro test battery as a pre-screen in the assessment of ocular irritancy. Toxicology In Vitro1994; 8: 75 - 79.
26.
Oecd.Acute Skin Irritation and corrosive testing. OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Test Guideline 404 OECD, Paris, 1992.
27.
Oecd.Report of OECD Workshop on Harmonisation of Validation and Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Toxicological Test Methods, January, 1996 (Solna, Sweden), 1996.
28.
Bruner LH, Carr GJ, Chamberlain M., Curren RDValidation of alternative methods for toxicity testing. Toxiol in Vitro1996; 10: 479-501.
29.
Freeberg FE , et al. Human and rabbit eye responses to chemical insult. Fund applToxicol1986; 7: 626-634.
30.
Courtellemont P., Hebert P., Redziniak G.Evaluation of the EYTEXTM system as a screening method for ocular tolerance: application to raw materials and finished products . Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1992 ; 20: 466-470.
31.
York M., Griffiths HA, Whittle E., Basketter D.Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis1996; 34: 204-212.
32.
MacDonald C.Development of new animal cell lines by oncogene immortalisation. The Genetic Engineer and Biotechnologist1993; 13: 121-124.
33.
Kruszewski FH, Walker TL, DiPasquale LC. Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for predicting ocular irritation . The Toxicologist1995; 15: 122.
34.
Ponec M.Reconstructed human epidermis in vitro: an alternative to animal testing . Alternatives to Laboratory Animals1995 ; 23: 97 -110.
35.
Barratt M.Quantitative-structure activity relationships for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols. Toxicol Letts1995 ; 75: 169-176.
36.
Chamberlain M., Barratt MDPractical applications of QSAR to in vitro toxicology illustrated by consideration of eye irritation. Toxicology In Vitro1995; 9: 543-547.
