Abstract
This paper discusses some of the theoretical problems of the use of scale models. Findings from a number of experiments on the validity of models are discussed. Generally, these experiments show a degree of similarity of observer responses to full-size mock-ups and scale models. However such similarities do not dispel the possibility that scale models and indeed full-size mock-ups are not true facsimiles of the real world because of the artificiality of many experimental set-ups; there is always a need for some field validation work. With the tendency towards using 'subtle' psychological measures for environmental evaluation rather than explicit criteria as in psychophysical experiments, further studies are urgently required.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
