Abstract
Objective
Dexamethasone (DEX), a synthetic glucocorticoid, has been widely used as a medication for premature delivery. However, the side effects of antenatal DEX treatment on fetal bone development, as well as the underlying mechanisms still remain to be elucidated. Here, we aimed to explore the effects and the related mechanisms of antenatal DEX exposure during late pregnancy on fetal bone growth and development.
Methods
Pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into DEX group and vehicle group from gestational day 14 (GD14). Pregnant rats in DEX group were intraperitoneally injected once with DEX (200 µg/kg body weight) on GD14, 16, 18, and 20. The vehicle group rats were administered the same amount of normal saline at the same time. Pregnant rats were anesthetized at GD21 to harvest fetal femurs for analysis.
Results
Antenatal DEX treatment delayed fetal skeletal growth via inhibiting extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis and downregulating insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling. Several components of IGF1 signaling pathway, including IGF1 receptor, insulin receptor substrate, as well as serine–threonine protein kinase, were down-regulated in fetal growth plate chondrocytes following DEX treatment.
Conclusion
This study indicated that antenatal DEX treatment-retarded fetal skeletal growth was associated with the down-regulation of IGF1 signaling in growth plate chondrocytes, providing important information about the impact of antenatal DEX application four courses on premature infant.
Introduction
Systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) are an essential therapy for a range of conditions, but associated with clinically significant toxic effects.1,2 Long-term GCs therapy can increase bone damage, and the major complications mainly include osteoporosis and cartilaginous bone growth impairment.2–3 In humans, longitudinal bone growth is rapid during fetal life and early childhood, and GCs have been widely used as a medication for numerous disorders during this period. GCs are considered to be important regulators of osteogenic cell differentiation during bone growth.3,4 Therefore, both fetus and child exposed or taking GCs often suffer from the harmful side effects on bone development.5–7 Treatment of childhood asthma, pediatric cancers, or autoimmune diseases with GCs can lead to growth retardation and potentially premature osteoporosis.6,7 Clinically, synthetic GCs is used antenatally to accelerate premature infant lung maturation. Dexamethasone (DEX), a synthetic GCs, can cross the placenta readily; therefore, it has been widely used for premature delivery. Clinical data suggest that fetal DEX exposure has detrimental effects on neonatal blood pressure, childhood cognition and long-term behavior, the effects of which can be long-lasting or even permanent.8,9 Clinically short-term administration of DEX can impact fetal bone growth and that effect can vary depending on frequently DEX administered (e.g., single or repeated dose). 5 However, the side effects of antenatal DEX treatment on fetal bone development, as well as the related mechanisms still remain to be elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to reveal the effects and underlining mechanisms of antenatal DEX treatment-induced fetal bone growth retardation, which would provide helpful information for the early prevention of bone growth retardation in utero growth retardation.
In mammalian, endochondral ossification is one of the skeleton develop processes.10,11 Longitudinal bone growth occurs at the growth plate as a result of endochondral ossification. 11 Growth plate chondrocytes play a central role in the process of endochondral ossification, contributing to longitudinal growth through the extracellular matrix (ECM) components secretion.10,11 Expression and secretion of cartilage ECM (including Aggrecan, Col2A1, and Col1A1) in growth plate chondrocytes are responsible for bone growth.10,11 Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) is an important long bone growth factor, and controls bone growth through stimulating the ECM secretion in growth plate chondrocytes.12,13 Recently, we and others have discovered that many antenatal insults or stress can cause fetal bone growth retardation by inhibiting IGF1 signaling pathway.14–16 For example, antenatal nicotine exposure retarded the chondrogenesis through down-regulation of IGF1 signaling pathway to inhibit ECM synthesis of growth plate chondrocytes in fetal rats. 14 Different stressors can be encountered in pregnancy. Notably, both human and animal studies have shown that acute and chronic stress could stimulate production and release of GCs.9,17–19 GCs are also considered as primary mediators of the organism response to stressors.9,19 This study speculated that antenatal GCs exposure may also affect fetal bone growth probably via regulating IGF1 signaling.
Materials and methods
Experimental animal
Pregnant Sprague–Dawley rats from the Animal Center of Soochow University were housed singly in a controlled environment of 22°C with a 12-h light/dark cycle, provided with standard rat food and tap water. They were randomly divided into the dexamethasone (DEX) and vehicle (VEH) groups from gestational day 14 (GD14) (N = 20 per group). Pregnant rats in DEX group were intraperitoneally injected once with DEX (200 µg/kg body weight, the dose is consistent with the clinical dosage) on GD14, 16, 18, and 20. The VEH pregnant rats were given the same amount of normal saline at the same time. Pregnant rats were anesthetized at GD21 with sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. 8–12 pups per litter were included in the statistics, resorbed and stillborn pups did not been counted. The body weight and body length of pups were measured, respectively. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) rate was diagnosed when the fetal body weight was two standard deviations lower than the mean body weight of the VEH group, and the IUGR rate was calculated according to the following formula: IUGR rate per group (%) = (the sum of IUGR rate per litter/litter number per group) ×100. 20 All experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soochow University.
Histological and immunohistochemical assays
After cesarean section, rear limb femurs of pups were isolated for subsequent histological and immunohistochemical assays. Femurs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, decalcified and embedded in paraffin. Serial longitudinal sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for quantification of the length of the primary ossification center and hypertrophic zone. The whole length of femur (FL) and the ratio of the calcifying zone (CL) to FL (CL/FL) were evaluated. 16 Safranin O-fast staining was performed to measure femur proteoglycan levels. Immunohistochemistry was performed with a diaminobenzidine kit for determining expressions of Aggrecan (sc-33,695), Col2A1 (sc-52,658), Col1A1 (sc-293,182), IGF1 (sc-74,116), IGF2 (sc-515,805), IGF1R (sc-81,464), Akt (sc-81,434), and IRS1 (sc-515,017) in femur growth plates. The primary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The slices were visualized under a Nikon microscope, and images were captured and analyzed using Image Pro Plus software. The intensity of immunohistochemistry was determined by measuring the mean optical density (MOD) in 10 sections from different samples.
Quantitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot
The list of the primers used in this study.
Aggrecan, cartilage aggregating proteoglycan; Col1A1, collagen type A 1; Col2A1, collagen type II A 1; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IGF2, insulin-like growth factor-2; IGF1R, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor; AKT1, serine–threonine protein kinase A; AKT2, serine-threonine protein kinase B; IRS1, insulin receptor substrate 1; IRS2, insulin receptor substrate 2.
Protein abundance of Aggrecan, Col2A1, Col1A1, IGF1/2, IGF1R, AKT, and IRS1 in femur growth plates were assessed by Western blot normalized to β-actin. Femurs tissues lysates were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Branford, CT, USA). The protein concentration in lysate was then determined using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China). For the western blot, 20 μg of protein extracts from each sample was loaded onto 8% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking with 5% nonfat milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Then, the membrane was incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Signals were visualized using chemiluminescence and imaging system (EC3-Imaging-System, Upland, CA, USA), and the ratio of band intensity to β-actin was analyzed using the ImageJ software to quantify the relative protein expression. All experiments were repeated three times with independently prepared tissue.20,21
Isolation fetal growth plate chondrocytes
Fetal growth plate chondrocytes were isolated from pups at GD21 as previously described.14,16 Briefly, the growth plates of the femur were dissected under an anatomy scope. Minced growth plates were incubated in 0.2% trypsin for 1 h, and then 0.2% collagenase for 3 h. Cell suspension was aspirated repeatedly and filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer, then rinsed first in serum-free Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM). After centrifugation at 1200 rpm for 5 min, the chondrocytes were cultured as monolayers in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Cultures were passaged every 2–3 days in 10 cm2 dish and used in experiments between passages 3 and 5. Total RNA was extracted from cells from VEH and DEX fetal femurs for qRT-PCR. To study the effect of DEX on proteoglycan and IGF1 signaling in growth plate chondrocytes in vitro, the cells from VEH fetal femurs were seeded and allowed to grow for 24 h with or without DEX (1 µM), then total RNA were extracted for qRT-PCR.
Data analysis and statistics
All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA), presented as the mean values ±S.E.M. Means between the VEH and DEX groups were compared by independent Student’s t-test. A value of p < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Intrauterine growth restriction rate, and skeletal growth in fetuses
At GD21, fetal body weight in the DEX group was significantly lower than that in the VEH group (3.866 g ± 0.0932 vs 4.803 g ± 0.4034, p < .001, Figure 1(a)), and the IUGR rate was increased from 10.18% (VEH) to 37.14% (DEX) (p < .01, Figure 1(b)). Fetal length was significantly decreased from 4.217 (VEH) to 3.507 cm (DEX) (p < .001, Figure 1(c)). Fetal femur length (FL) was statistically shorter in DEX group than that in VEH group (5.386 vs 6.329 mm, respectively). Moreover, the ratio of femur calcifying zone in the total length of femur (CL/FL) was 30.01%, which was lower than that in VEH group (35.60%) (p < .05, Figures 1(d–f)). The ECM levels were detected in femoral growth plates chondrocytes by Safranin O-fast staining. Compared with the VEH group, the growth plates in DEX group exhibited a deceased level in cartilage ECM proteoglycan (Figure 1(g)). These results indicated that antenatal DEX exposure increased the IUGR rates, and delayed fetal skeletal growth in fetuses. Fetal body weight, IUGR rate, fetal length and femur growth at GD21. (A) Fetal body weight. (B) IUGR rate. (C) Fetal length. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of fetal femur; FL, femur lengths, CL, calcifying zone lengths. (E, F) Femur length and CL/FL ratio. (G) Safranin O-fast staining was performed on the femur sections to measure proteoglycan levels; proteoglycan levels in fetal growth plates as determined by measuring mean optical density. DEX, dexamethasone group; VEH, vehicle group; IUGR, intrauterine growth retardation; GD, gestational day; Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, N = 20, N, number of litters; *p < .05; **p < .01.
Inhibiting extracellular matrix levels in the fetal femoral growth plates
Immunohistochemical staining showed that the expressions of Aggrecan, Col2A1, and Col1A1 in the DEX group were lower than those in the VEH group (Figures 2(a)–(d)). qRT-PCR and Western blot assays showed that both mRNA and protein levels of these ECM genes were lower in the DEX group (Figures 2(e) and (f)). These data suggested that antenatal DEX exposure markedly inhibited the synthesis of proteoglycan in the femoral growth plates. Secretion of cartilage ECM in the fetal growth plate. (A–D) Levels of Aggrecan, Col2A1 and Col1A1 detected by Immunohistochemical analysis. (E and F) Expressions of Aggrecan, Col2A1 and Col1A1 in fetal growth plate determined by qRT-PCR and Western blot. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, N = 6; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
Insulin-like growth factor1 signaling in the fetal femoral growth plates
The expressions of IGF1, IGF2, IGF1R, IRS1/2, and AKT/2 in growth plates were determined. As shown in Figures 3(a)–(d), levels of IGF1 and IGF1R were decreased in the DEX group, whereas no significant differences were observed in IGF2 levels between the two groups. Consistently, significant decreases in mRNA and protein levels of IGF1 and IGF1R were observed in the DEX group (Figures 3(e) and (f)). We also determined the levels of IRS1, IRS2, AKT1, and AKT2 in growth plates. As shown in Figure 4, the expressions of IRS1 and AKT1/2 was also significantly decreased in the DEX group. Expressions of IGF1, IGF1 and IGF1R in fetal growth plates. (A–D) Expressions of IGF1, IGF2, and IGF1R determined by Immunohistochemical analysis. (E and F) mRNA and protein levels of IGF1, IGF2, and IGF1R in the fetal growth plate. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, N = 20; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001. Expressions of AKT1/2 and IRS1 in fetal growth plates. (A–C) Immunohistochemical analysis detecting AKT1/2, and IRS1 expressions. (D) mRNA levels of AKT1, AKT2, IRS1, and IRS2. (F) Protein levels of AKT1/2, and IRS1. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, N = 20; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

The effect of DEX on proteoglycan and IGF1 signaling genes in fetal growth plate chondrocytes in vitro
As already observed in fetal femurs, proteoglycan and IGF1 signaling were also decreased in the isolated DEX-exposed fetal growth plate chondrocytes (Figures 5(a)–(c)). To study the direct effects of DEX on growth plates chondrocytes in vitro, we cultured chondrocytes in DEX-exposed environment for 48 h, and then determined the expressions of ECM and IGF1 signaling genes. DEX exposure caused a significant decrease in expressions of all three ECM-specific genes (Figures 5(d) and (e)). Additionally, DEX exposure also markedly reduced the expressions of IGF1, IGF2, IRS1, and AKT2 in growth plate chondrocytes (Figures 5(f) and (g)). These data indicated that DEX exposure could directly decrease the expressions of ECM and IGF1 signaling genes in growth plate chondrocytes. Summarily, our study indicated antenatal DEX-retarded fetal bone growth was associated with the reduced ECM levels via down-regulating IGF1 signaling in fetal growth plates. Figure 6 summarized the working model for the fetal skeletal growth dysfunction following antenatal DEX treatment. The effect of DEX on ECM and IGF1 signaling genes in growth plate chondrocytes in vitro. (A–C) qRT-PCR to detect the expressions of ECM and IGF1 signaling genes in the isolated fetal growth plate chondrocytes in vitro. (D) Cultured growth plate chondrocytes in vitro. (E–G) Expressions of ECM and IGF1 signaling genes under DEX condition. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM, Results from 3–6 independent experiments; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001. A model for a mechanistic explanation of the effect of antenatal DEX treatment on fetal skeletal growth. Antenatal DEX treatment-retarded fetal long bone growth was associated with the reduced ECM levels via the down-regulating IGF1 signaling in fetal growth plates. Summarized the working model for the fetal skeletal growth dysfunction following antenatal DEX treatment.

Discussion
Dexamethasone is increasingly used during the perinatal and neonatal periods. We know relatively little about how antenatal DEX exposure affects signaling molecules during bone development. As the use of antenatal DEX has been extensive, it is very important to understand any potentially harmful side effects on fetal bone development. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide information on the effects of antenatal DEX usage on fetal bone growth and clarify the mechanisms. The dose of DEX used in human pregnancy is 0.1–0.5 mg/kg body weight every course for indicated preterm labor (e.g., single or repeated dose, usually one to four courses of DEX treatment). Considering the dose conversion between rat and human (conversion factor is 0.16), 22 antenatal DEX treatment in rats at 200 µg/kg in this study is comparable with that prescribed for pregnant women (0.15 mg/kg). 23 In addition, time of DEX administration was once every 2 days from GD14 to 20, basically mimic clinical application four courses for preterm labor.
As in previous studies, antenatal DEX treatment could increase IUGR rate, decrease body length and weight.21,24 This study found that antenatal DEX treatment exhibited an adverse effect on long bone with shortened and less mineralized femur in fetuses. Antenatal DEX treatment could remarkably reduce the expression levels of ECM genes in fetal growth plates, suggesting that antenatal DEX exposure delayed skeletal growth via inhibiting ECM synthesis. Secretion of ECM are controlled by complex endocrine factors, such as IGF1.25,26 IGF1-deficient mouse exhibits skeletal malformations, indicating that IGF1 signaling was participated in regulating intrauterine fetal skeletal growth. 13 In addition, when the fetus suffered adverse factors or stress, IGF1 was reported to regulate ECM synthesis of growth plate chondrocytes in fetal bone development process.14–16 The present study found that the expressions of several components of IGF1 signaling pathway were significantly decreased in the fetal growth plates following antenatal DEX exposure, suggesting that antenatal DEX exposure inhibited ECM synthesis mainly through down-regulating IGF1 signaling. Meanwhile, DEX-exposed growth plate chondrocytes exhibited a significant decrease in expressions of ECM genes and several genes of the IGF1 signaling pathway. These data demonstrated that DEX could decrease ECM synthesis and IGF1 signaling gene expressions in vivo and in vitro, and indicated that antenatal DEX exposure-retarded fetal bone growth was associated with the down-regulation of IGF1 signaling in growth plate chondrocytes.
The behavior of growth plate chondrocytes is tightly regulated by circulating growth hormone, locally produced growth factors (including Indian hedgehog (IHH), Wnt, IGF1, and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP)) and the components of ECM.10,27 Like IGF1, the BMP, IHH, and Wnt signaling pathways are also key regulators in the long bone development.10,27 In this study, we also tested the effects of antenatal DEX exposure on these signaling pathways, and did not observe the abnormal expression of these signaling pathways in fetal femoral growth plate (data not show), indicating that there were unique effects of antenatal DEX exposure on IGF1 signaling with four courses of DEX treatment in late gestational stages. Thus, it is of great significance to take a further step in the research of the precise molecular mechanism of antenatal DEX reprogrammed IGF1 signaling in fetal femoral growth plate, which would be targeted in our future works.
Clinical follow-up studies have shown that the adverse effects of DEX treatment on fetal bone development are substantial in the last trimester of pregnancy.5–6,28 Infants who had received multiple courses of DEX in intrauterine, had a reduced head circumference at birth.29–30 A 2-year follow-up study showed similar findings for children exposed to only a single course of DEX during pregnancy. 31 Numerous animal-based and in vitro studies have also shown that DEX exerts different effects on bone growth at different developmental stages.32–34 For example, in early gestational stages, antenatal DEX exposure can cause minor cranial-skeletal abnormalities in rhesus macaques. 32 In middle and late gestational stages, antenatal DEX exposure shortened long bones in rats. 33 In the late gestational stage, maternal treatment with DEX during the last 24 days resulted in a dramatic reduction in bone mineral density and content finally increasing the risk of fractures of limb bones in piglets. 34 In addition, numerous animal data indicated that antenatal GCs exposure have adverse bone effects in the adult offspring, with alterations in parameters of long bones, being a common finding in animal models across several species.35–38 Over the past several years, several studies have revealed the underline mechanisms of antenatal DEX exposure-induced long bone development retardation.33,39 For example, Zhang et al. 33 reported prenatal DEX exposure delays endochondral ossification by suppressing chondrocyte maturation, which may be partly mediated by mitogen-inducible gene-6 activation in bone. 33 Here, this study indicated that antenatal DEX exposure impaired fetal long bones growth via decreasing IGF1 signaling gene expression and ECM synthesis. The possible reasons for these different conclusions might be the course and dose, and the gestational week of DEX exposure.
In summary, the present study, established animal model that basically mimic DEX clinical application, revealed that fetal bone growth changes following antenatal DEX treatment and clarified the related mechanisms, providing important information about the impact of antenatal DEX application four courses on premature infant. From a clinical point of view, a fuller understanding of the negative effects of DEX on bone development would have important implications for the routine use of DEX in clinical practice. Of course, further clinical observation of the infants who had received antenatal DEX treatment in pregnancy are necessary to verify our study results.
Footnotes
Author contributions
GQ and ZZ conceived and designed experiments and wrote the article.
GQ, JQ, XF, HD, TX, and MZ performed most of the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared figures.
All authors reviewed and gave approval of the final draft.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Supported partly by Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0802600), National Nature and Science Foundation of China (81873841, 81741024, and 814012442), Suzhou “Wei Sheng Ren Cai (GSWS2019029)” program, Suzhou Medical and Industrial Integration Collaborative Innovation Research Project (SL J202012, SKY2021035) and Clinical Trial Institution Capacity Enhancement Project (SLT202003), and General Programs of Jiangsu Commission of Health (M2021087).
