Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The color of the teeth is an important topic for many people and can be influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic stains. There is an increasing demand for whitening of the teeth year by year. The most popular way of whitening is “bleaching,” which is the result of the breakdown of pigments located in the enamel and/or the dentin, caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) released from bleaching agents. These bleaching agents could increase matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-mediated collagen degradation in dentin. The aim of this study was to compare biochemical changes and oxidative stress levels of the human premolar dentin–pulp complex after three different bleaching methods containing hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) bleaching agents. Individuals, whose first four premolars were extracted for orthodontic purposes, included into the study. Group 1—Laser: bleaching gel containing 46% H₂O₂ (LaserWhite20 whitening gel, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA) and a diode laser activation (Ezlase 940 nm system). Group 2: 35% H₂O₂ containing whitening gel (Whiteness HP Maxx, FGM) and halogen light source activation (Optilux 501, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). Group 3: 35% H₂O₂ containing whitening gel (Whiteness HP Maxx, FGM). Group 4—Control: No whitening treatment. According to the test results, there were no significant differences among groups in the values of cathepsin B and MMP proteolytic activities (p > 0.05). The total ROS values released from the dentin tissue were higher than those obtained from the pulp tissue (p < 0.05). There were significant differences among the bleaching groups in the ROS values released from the dentin tissue.

Keywords

Dental bleaching hydrogen peroxide diode laser cathepsin B MMP ROS

Introduction

Tooth color is influenced by a combination of their intrinsic color and the presence of any extrinsic stains on the tooth surface.¹ Extrinsic tooth stains usually result from the colored components of various foods and beverages, including coffee, tea, red wine, and tobacco products.² Also, intrinsic tooth stains such as aging, tetracycline, intrapulpal hemorrhage, calcific metamorphosis, pulp necrosis, and certain diseases or tooth defects can cause to teeth discoloration.² Color producing stains within tooth structures are often organic compounds that contain conjugated double bonds. It is known from dye chemistry that decoloration can occur due to the breakup of a chromophore, and that destruction of one or more of the double bonds within the conjugated system is probably involved.³

There are various methods and techniques in the literature have been used to remove tooth-surface stains to achieve a whitening effect. In general, peroxide-based bleaching products and abrasive materials are used to remove extrinsic and intrinsic tooth stains.² Vital tooth bleaching therapies involve home- or office-type treatments. In-office bleaching, the bleaching gel is applied by the dentist during a clinical session and may be activated by a light source. However, in home bleaching, the patients use the trays and gels according to the dentist’s descriptions.⁴ The use of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) solution to remove tooth stains can be traced back more than a century.⁵ H₂O₂ can penetrate dentin, where it releases oxygen and thereby breaks the double bonds of the organic and inorganic compounds inside the dentinal tubules.⁶ Dental bleaching depends on the penetration of H₂O₂-free radicals through the enamel and into the dentin,⁷ breaking the dentin’s chromogenic molecules down into smaller structures.^8,9 Tooth bleaching is the result of the breakdown of pigments located in the enamel and/or the dentin, which caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) released from bleaching agents such as hydroxyl radicals (OH⁻) and singlet oxygen (¹O₂).¹⁰ The reaction of free oxygen radicals with the colored organic materials found within tooth structures can lead to a reduction in colour.¹¹

For many years, heat or light has been used to speed up the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide for a faster whitening result. Various devices, including halogen curing lights, light emitting diodes (LEDs), diode lasers, argon lasers, and plasma arc lamps, have been used.¹² To provide a faster and more effective treatment, office bleaching agents have been used in association with an energy source. Absorbance of the energy in the bleaching gel produces heat that accelerates the oxidation reaction in the office bleaching agent. In terms of the effect of heat on office bleaching, it has been reported that a 10°C increase can double the chemical reaction rate.¹³

The release of free radicals from the bleaching agents can be facilitated by laser radiation, which leads to a faster whitening process. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the laser irradiation could minimize hypersensitivity of the teeth during the bleaching process.^14,15 Laser is therefore a promising coadjutant treatment that can be used in the photodynamic therapy,¹⁶ stimulating cell differentiation, and reduction of inflammation and tissue repair.¹⁷ The biostimulatory effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on pulp cells such as odontoblasts are important, because these cells are responsible for dentin matrix deposition and its mineralization. In addition, odontoblasts are the first pulp cells to be reached by products released from dental materials capable of diffusing through enamel/dentin.¹⁸

When bleaching gels with high concentrations of H₂O₂, such as those proposed for the in-office bleaching technique, are applied to the tooth surface, a large quantity of H₂O₂ diffuses rapidly through the enamel and the dentin, causing intense pulpal damage and tooth sensitivity.¹⁹ Although H₂O₂ is effective in whitening darkened/colored teeth, it has been claimed that its oxidative effect is responsible for histochemical²⁰ and morphological alterations in the structure of dental tissues.²¹ This may explain why the mechanical properties of these tissues are significantly reduced after bleaching treatment.²² Moreover, in certain circumstances, H₂O₂ can reach the pulp chamber through dentinal tubules, causing reduction of cell proliferation, metabolism, and viability,²³ as well as the reduction of pulp-reparative capacity²⁴ and tissue necrosis.¹⁹

It has been reported that bleaching agents could increase matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-mediated collagen degradation in dentin.⁹ Several in vitro studies have established the adverse effects of bleaching agents, such as cytotoxicity and DNA modification.^25,26 According to these studies, the human dentin–pulp complex contains, in addition to MMPs, cysteine proteases, which, in conjunction with MMPs, may play a part in the remodeling/degradation process of the dentin matrix in both sound and caries affected teeth.^27,28

Although several in vitro studies have evaluated the cytotoxicity of bleaching agents to the culture of cells, there is little available data concerning the effects of bleaching agents on the human dentin–pulp complex.^7,29,30 Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the potential effects of the three different bleaching methods on proteolytic activities (cathepsin B, MMPs) and ROS designation responses of the human premolar dentin–pulp complex.

The null hypotheses to be investigated in this study were as follows:

There would be no differences between the proteolytic activities induced by different bleaching methods (the bleaching methods would not be effective on proteolytic activities—cathepsin B, MMPs, and ROS).

There would be no differences between the proteolytic activities of the dentin and pulp tissues.

Materials and methods

Study design

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey; the protocol number is 14-KAEK-259 and is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on experimentation involving human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants. Individuals between the ages of 15 and 25, whose first four premolars were to be extracted for orthodontic reasons, were included. The criteria included a plaque index score of ≤20%, first or second premolars with no gingival recession, caries or restorations, and no history of previous whitening treatment or tobacco use. Also, color shade of premolar teeth to be extracted was A2 or darker. It was aimed to decrease color of teeth one color shade for all experimental groups. A total of 40 premolar teeth were whitened in the study, 20 each from the upper and lower premolars of 10 individuals (n = 10 teeth). A split-mouth method was utilized for the study. The initial color of the premolar teeth was determined using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The first bleaching cycles of groups were applied according to the manufacturer’ recommendations. The tooth surface was cleaned from the bleaching gel using a saliva ejector with high-power suction. The second bleaching cycle was immediately repeated in the same session if necessary, until one shade color change was achieved in all groups except the control group. After bleaching, color values were measured again.

Group preparation

The premolar teeth to be extracted received the following tooth whitening treatments:

Group 1—laser: The premolar tooth surface was covered with LaserWhite20 whitening gel (Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA) containing 46% H₂O₂. Activation of bleaching gel was performed with a diode laser (940 nm; Epic 10, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA). The diode laser was applied according to the manufacturer’s recommendations: continuous mode, 200j, 7 W with 30 s of power. Next, the bleaching gel was removed from the enamel surface using a saliva ejector with high-power suction.

Group 2—whitening gel and halogen light (W + HL): The tooth surface was covered with Whiteness HP Maxx (FGM, Joinville, SC, Brazil) containing 35% H₂O₂. The bleaching gel was activated with the bleaching mode of the halogen light curing unit (Optilux 501, Kerr, Orange, CA, USA). The bleaching procedure was performed with activations of 30 s each (4 × 30 s, interval 3 min between activations) for a total of 15 min according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The bleaching gel was removed from the enamel surface using a saliva ejector with high-power suction.

Group 3—whitening gel (W): The tooth surface was covered with Whiteness HP Maxx (FGM) containing 35% H₂O₂ for 15 min according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The bleaching gel was then removed, with care taken to avoid overflowing.

Group 4—control: The teeth were extracted without any whitening procedures.

Teeth extraction and sample preparation

The patients were directed to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic 24 h after the bleaching procedures. The teeth were extracted by same surgical dentist with the local anesthesia. After extraction, the teeth were separated from the enamel-cement junction, and the pulp tissue was removed from the pulp chamber. For storage, pulp and dentin tissues were placed in transport nutritive medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM); Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) containing penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA). The specimens were then frozen at 80°C and were dispatched immediately to the laboratory.

Proteolytic activities in dentin and pulp

The hard tissues of the teeth of the experimental and control groups were frozen at 80°C. Then, dentin tissues were powdered, and pulp tissues were thawed and homogenized. Cathepsin B activation in the dentin powder and pulpal tissues, as well as collagenolytic/gelatinolytic MMP activities, was evaluated spectrofluorometrically as in the Scaffa et al.’s study.³¹

Detection of ROS in dentin and pulp

The hard tissues of the teeth of the experimental and control groups were frozen at 80°C. Then, dentin tissues were powdered, and pulp tissues were thawed and homogenized. Total ROS in the dentin and pulp tissues of all groups were determined by spectrofluorometry. The tissues were incubated with 4 mM 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA;Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, USA) fluorogenic probe for 30 min. After incubation, ROS values were quantitated from the supernatant by spectrofluorometry.²⁹

Statistical analysis

Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparison between groups. A Bonferroni correction was made for multiple comparisons. p-Value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS 19 (IBM SPSS Statistics 19, SPSS Inc., an IBM Co., Somers, New York, USA).

Results

The three-way ANOVA results revealed significant differences between the different test methods that were evaluated (cathepsin B, MMPs, and ROS activities (DCFDA); p = 0.000) and the bleaching methods (p = 0.003). There were also significant differences in the response of the dentin–pulp complex to bleaching methods (p = 0.000; Table 1). The test results investigated for the bleaching methods and teeth tissues are shown in Figures 1 to 3 and Tables 2 and 3.

Table 1.

Three-way ANOVA.

	Type III sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	Sig.
Test	47,176,507	2	23,588,254	52,443	0.000
Bleaching methods	6,416,472	3	2,138,824	4755	0.003
Region	17,337,416	1	17,337,416	38,545	0.000

ANOVA: analysis of variance.

Figure 1.

The bar chart represents the amount of cathepsin B in dentin powders and pulp tissues according to bleaching methods and control group-N (number of samples): 10 teeth, (p < 0.05).

Figure 2.

The bar chart represents the MMP activates (degradation unit per microgram of sample; mean with SD) dentin powders and pulp tissues according to bleaching methods-N (number of samples): 10 teeth (p < 0.05). MMP: matrix metalloproteinase.

Figure 3.

The bar chart represents the amount of ROS (DCFDA) in dentin powders and pulp tissues according to bleaching methods-N (number of samples): 10 teeth, (p < 0.05). DCFDA: 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; ROS: reactive oxygen species.

Table 2.

Comparison of bleaching methods in dentin and pulp tissues according to test methods.

Test	Region	Method	Mean ± SD (AUF/µg)
Cathepsin B	Dentin	Laser	4.66 ± 0.39^a
		W + HL	4.93 ± 1.03^a
		W	4.66 ± 0.84^a
		Control	4.38 ± 0.28^a
	Pulp	Laser	6.66 ± 1.08^a
		W + HL	6.06 ± 0.95^a
		W	5.92 ± 1.09^a
		Control	5.8 ± 0.83^a
MMPs	Dentin	Laser	10.27 ± 3.27^a
		W + HL	10.31 ± 2.72^a
		W	10.8 ± 3.17^a
		Control	9.71 ± 2.9^a
	Pulp	Laser	10.26 ± 3.02^a
		W + HL	9.31 ± 1.77^a
		W	10.43 ± 2.04^a
		Control	9.01 ± 1.68^a
DCFDA-total ROS	Dentin	Laser	83.13 ± 56.72^a
		W + HL	103.36 ± 78.63^a
		W	34.54 ± 25.11^b
		Control	31.5 ± 24.29^b
	Pulp	Laser	10.73 ± 3.62^a
		W + HL	10.79 ± 4.07^a
		W	13.41 ± 8.18^a
		Control	9.89 ± 4.08^a

ROS: reactive oxygen species; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; DCFDA: 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; W + HL: whitening gel and halogen light.

^a,bSame letters indicate an insignificant difference among groups. In dentin tissue, for total ROS, there were significant differences between Laser versus W; Laser versus Control; W + HL versus W; W + HL versus Control group (p < 0.05).

Table 3.

Comparison of dentin and pulp tissues according to bleaching methods.

Test	Region	Method	Mean ± SD (AUF/µg)
Cathepsin B	Laser	Dentin	4.66 ± 0.39^a
	Laser	Pulp	6.66 ± 1.08^a
	W + HL	Dentin	4.93 ± 1.03^a
	W + HL	Pulp	6.06 ± 0.95^a
	W	Dentin	4.66 ± 0.84^a
	W	Pulp	5.92 ± 1.09^a
	Control	Dentin	4.38 ± 0.28^a
	Control	Pulp	5.8 ± 0.83^a
MMPs	Laser	Dentin	10.27 ± 3.27^a
	Laser	Pulp	10.26 ± 3.02^a
	W + HL	Dentin	10.31 ± 2.72^a
	W + HL	Pulp	9.31 ± 1.77^a
	W	Dentin	10.8 ± 3.17^a
	W	Pulp	10.43 ± 2.04^a
	Control	Dentin	9.71 ± 2.9^a
	Control	Pulp	9.01 ± 1.68^a
DCFDA-total ROS	Laser	Dentin	83.13 ± 56.72^a
	Laser	Pulp	10.73 ± 3.62^b
	W + HL	Dentin	103.36 ± 78.63^a
	W + HL	Pulp	10.79 ± 4.07^b
	W	Dentin	34.54 ± 25.11^a
	W	Pulp	13.41 ± 8.18^b
	Control	Dentin	31.5 ± 24.29^a
	Control	Pulp	9.89 ± 4.08^b

ROS: reactive oxygen species; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; DCFDA: 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; w + HL: whitening gel and halogen light.

^a,bSame letters indicate an insignificant difference among groups. For total ROS, there were significant differences between dentin and pulp tissues in all groups (p < 0.05).

Cathepsin B test results

According to the test results, there were no significant differences among bleaching groups in the values of cathepsin B released from dentin tissues (p > 0.05). Again similarly, there were no significant differences among bleaching groups in the values of cathepsin B released from pulp tissues (p > 0.05; Table 2 and Figure 1).

In all study groups, including the control group, there were no significant differences between the values of cathepsin B released from dentin and pulp tissues (p > 0.05; Table 3 and Figure 1).

MMP test results

There were no significant differences among bleaching groups in the values of MMP proteolytic activities released from dentin tissues (p > 0.05). As in the results of cathepsin B, there were no significant differences among groups in the amount of MMP released from pulp tissues (p > 0.05; Table 2 and Figure 2).

When all groups were evaluated including the control group, there were no significant differences between the amount of MMP released from dentin and pulp tissues (p > 0.05; Table 3 and Figure 2).

DCFDA (total ROS) test results

There were no significant differences among bleaching groups in the amount of total ROS released from pulp tissues (p > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences among study groups in the amount of total ROS released from dentin tissues (p < 0.05; Table 2 and Figure 3). The highest ROS value was obtained in the whitening gel with halogen light (W + HL) group (p < 0.05). Although there was no difference between the control and the W group, the lowest DCFDA value was seen in the control group (Table 2).

The total ROS amount obtained from dentin powder was significantly higher than pulp tissue (p < 0.05; Table 3 and Figure 3).

Discussion

H₂O₂ is a ROS that is applied widely in dental bleaching, because it has the capacity to dissociate into other ROS with high levels of oxidative activity.³² However, H₂O₂, together with its degradation products, can result in damage to the pulp cells, in particular the odontoblasts underlying the dentin.²⁴ It has been reported that increased ROS levels have deleterious effects on various cell components, including lipid peroxidation, oxidative changes of proteins, and DNA cell damage.³³ In this in vivo study, we compared the potential effects of three different bleaching methods on proteolytic activities (cathepsin B, MMPs) and ROS designation responses of the human premolar dentin–pulp complex. The results of this study did not support the null hypothesis that there would be no differences in the proteolytic activities induced by different bleaching methods, because significant differences were found between the effects of bleaching methods on proteolytic activities (cathepsin B, MMPs) and ROS designation responses of human teeth (p = 0.003). Also, the second null hypothesis that there would be no differences between the proteolytic activities of the dentin and pulp tissues was not supported: significant differences were observed in the response of the dentin–pulp complex to bleaching methods (p = 0.000).

The efficiency of the bleaching agent depends on the release of free radicals such as oxygen (¹O₂) and hydroxyl (OH⁻).¹³ It is reported that the bleaching agent did not affect cysteine cathepsin or MMP activities in gingival crevicular fluid, suggesting that the procedure does not induce gingival damage.²⁹ H₂O₂ can diffuse through the enamel and the dentin, reaching the dental pulp.³⁴ Vital teeth present dentinal fluid flow produced by intrapulpal pressure and cytoplasmatic prolongations of odontoblasts, as well as other intratubular components, which may impede the diffusion of the bleaching gel components through the dentinal tubules.¹⁹ In the presence of oxidative stress after bleaching, the defense system of the pulp cells is activated, releasing several endogenous antioxidant agents, such as peroxidases and catalases, which promote an enzymatic degradation of H₂O₂ to avoid excessive tissue damage.³⁵ Thus, in this in vivo study, we investigated the proteolytic activities (cathepsin B, MMPs) and ROS designation responses in the human premolar dentin–pulp complex after vital bleaching.

The available techniques for vital tooth bleaching differ in terms of the type and concentration of the bleaching agent, the time of application, product presentation, mode of application, and light activation.^19,36 Bleaching reaction is also affected by heat.¹² It has been reported that heat application enhances the penetration of hydrogen peroxide into the tooth pulp.³⁷ For in-office procedures, the use of curing lights (including halogen curing lights, plasma arches, LED, and lasers) has been recommended to accelerate the action of the bleaching gel.³⁸ It is assumed that irradiation from a diode laser light source heats the H₂O₂, thereby accelerating the decomposition of H₂O₂ and the formation of hydroxyl and oxygen free radicals³⁹; it thus reduces the treatment time and possibly enhances the results. Kashima-Tanaka et al.⁴⁰ have shown that the amounts of OH- generated from H₂O₂ are higher when the peroxide is activated by light sources (plasma arc lamp and halogen lamp) than when it is activated by laser irradiation (He–Ne laser and yellow He–Ne laser). Robertson and Melfi⁴¹ reported that disastrous pulp response in bleached premolars was observed only when the bleaching agent was heated. No pulp damage was reported in the unheated bleaching group. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the proteolytic activities and ROS designation responses in the human dentin and pulp tissues after the bleaching material was activated by a diode laser and a halogen light curing unit.

After exposure to bleaching agents, it is reported that the loss of collagen contributes to a reduction in the mechanical properties of the dentin.²² Sato et al.²⁹ reported that a bleaching agent containing 35% H₂O₂ induced a significant in vivo alteration in the enamel and the dentin, which could potentially trigger biological and/or mechanical responses of dental structures. Sato et al. also investigated the potential effect of 35% H₂O₂ on the in vivo activity of dentin cysteine proteases and MMPs after vital bleaching. In their study, the effect of the H₂O₂ on human pulp tissue was evaluated by measurement of the amount of ROS and by the level of the lysosomal cathepsin B proteolytic enzyme in pulp induced by bleaching. They reported that statistically significant increases in both cathepsin B and ROS were observed in the pulp, and that a statistically significant increase in both cathepsin B and MMP proteolytic activities was observed in the dentin.²⁹ The acidity of the bleaching agents may trigger the autocatalytic activation of MMPs in the dentin–pulp complex and the stabilization of the cysteine proteases.²⁷ Vaz et al.⁴² evaluated the macrophages migration, mast cell density, inflammation intensity, and pulp damage after the use of two bleaching techniques. Teeth were extracted 7 days after bleaching in their study. They reported that variability in the severity of inflammation factors may be due to the differences in time between bleaching procedures and tooth extraction.⁴² Robertson and Melfi⁴¹ reported that 4-day intervals between treatment and extraction are the optimal period to evaluate pulpal reaction. For this in vivo study, all teeth were extracted 24 h after bleaching, except those in the control group. According to our findings, although the values of cathepsin B and MMPs obtained from the pulp and dentin tissues of teeth subjected to bleaching methods were higher than those obtained from the control group, there were no statistically significant differences between the different bleaching methods. These results for cathepsin B and MMPs are valid for both the pulp and the dentin tissue. In this study, unlike our cathepsin B and MMP findings, we obtained total ROS (DCFDA) values in the dentin and pulp tissues. The ROS values obtained from the dentin tissue were statistically significantly higher than those obtained from the pulp tissue. Moreover, there were statistically significant differences among the bleaching groups. The highest ROS value was obtained in W + HL group. The lower ROS value in the pulp tissue may be ascribed to the dentin preventing diffusion of the bleaching agent components.

Although the effects of LLLT on the viability of cells exposed to bleaching agents have been evaluated in several studies, the outcomes are controversial. Dantas et al.⁴³ indicated that irradiation from a low power 780-nm laser at energy density of 10 J/cm² was capable of compensating for the cytotoxic effects of 35% H₂O₂ on human pulp fibroblasts. It was reported that LLLT may be capable of attenuating the damage and inflammation induced by in-office bleaching products in pulp tissue and can thus possibly reduce the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity arising from bleaching.⁴⁴ Furthermore, it was also reported that laser irradiation can modulate cell responses by acting on the mitochondria, increasing the levels of ATP and intracellular calcium.⁴⁵ The results of the current in vivo study suggest that the values of cathepsin B, MMPs, and ROS were not reduced as much in the diode laser group as in the other experimental groups. In the present study, the bleaching gel containing 46% H₂O₂ was activated by the diode laser according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (continuous mode, 200j, 7 W with 30 s of power). There were no significant differences among the experimental bleaching groups. The inadequacy of diode laser in reducing proteolytic activities may be due to the use of 46% H₂O₂ or to the variable parameters of the laser protocols tested (wavelength, potency, energy density). In Lima et al.’s⁴⁶ study, different parameters of low-level laser irradiation (4, 10, and 15 J/cm²) were applied to bio-stimulate ROS-damaged pulp cells. They reported that the laser protocols tested were not capable of influencing the metabolism of previously damaged odontoblast-like cells.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were obtained:

– When cathepsin B and MMPs were evaluated in the dentin and pulp separately, no differences were observed between the bleaching groups in either tissue.

– The Total ROS values released from the dentin tissue were higher than those obtained from the pulp tissue. Moreover, there were significant differences among the bleaching groups for the dentin tissue.

– Dentin tissue showed more biochemical changes than pulp tissue.

– There is a need for further studies to evaluate different extraction times of the teeth, as well as different laser parameters and H₂O₂ concentration.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Gaziosmanpasa University Scientific Research Projects Commission (project no: 2015/37).

ORCID iD

ES Karaarslan

References

Mortazavi

Baharvand

Khodadoustan

. Colors in tooth discoloration: a new classification and literature review. Int J Clin Dent 2014; 7: 17–28.

. Stain removal and whitening by baking soda dentifrice: a review of literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2017; 148: 20–26.

Kwon

Wertz

. Review of the mechanism of tooth whitening. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015; 275: 240–257.

Al-Salehi

Hatton

P V

McLeod

. The effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on metal ion release from dental amalgam. J Dent 2007; 35: 172–176.

. Biological properties of peroxide-containing tooth whiteners. Food Chem Toxicol 1996; 34: 887–904.

Seghi

Denry

. Effects of external bleaching on indentation and abrasion characteristics of human enamel in vitro. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1340–1344.

Kina

Huck

Riehl

. Response of human pulps after professionally applied vital tooth bleaching. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 572–580.

Plotino

Buono

Grande

. Nonvital tooth bleaching: a review of the literature and clinical procedures. J Endod 2008; 34: 394–407.

Toledano

Yamauti

Osorio

. Bleaching agents increase metalloproteinases-mediated collagen degradation in Dentin. J Endod 2011; 37: 1668–1672.

10.

Kawamoto

Tsujimoto

. Effects of the hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide on tooth bleaching. J Endod 2004; 30: 45–50.

11.

Joiner

. The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature. J Dent 2006; 34: 412–419.

12.

Buchalla

Attin

. External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser-a systematic review. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 586–596.

13.

Goldstein

Garber

. Complete dental bleaching. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995, pp. 25–33.

14.

Wetter

Barroso

MCS

Pelino

JEP

. Dental bleaching efficacy with diode laser and LED irradiation: an in vitro study. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35: 254–258.

15.

Ghanbarzade

Ahrari

Akbari

. Microhardness of demineralized enamel following home bleaching and laser-assisted in office bleaching. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: e405–e409.

16.

Campos

Pimentel

Ribeiro

. The adjunctive effect of photodynamic therapy for residual pockets in single-rooted teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 2013; 28: 317–324.

17.

Oliveira

Basso

Lins

. In vitro effect of low-level laser on odontoblast-like cells. Laser Phys Lett 2011; 8: 155–163.

18.

De Lima

Lessa

FCR

Mancini

MNG

. Cytotoxic effects of different concentrations of a carbamide peroxide bleaching gel on odontoblast-like cells MDPC-23. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 2009; 90B: 907–912.

19.

Costa

CAS

Riehl

Kina

. Human pulp responses to in-office tooth bleaching. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 59–64.

20.

Bistey

Nagy

Simó

. In vitro FT-IR study of the effects of hydrogen peroxide on superficial tooth enamel. J Dent 2007; 35: 325–330.

21.

Hegedus

Bistey

Flora-Nagy

. An atomic force microscopy study on the effect of bleaching agents on enamel surface. J Dent 1999; 27: 509–515.

22.

Forner

Salmerón-Sánchez

Palomares

. The use of atomic force microscopy in determining the stiffness and adhesion force of human dentin after exposure to bleaching agents. J Endod 2009; 35: 1384–1386.

23.

Min

Lee

Kim

. Hydrogen peroxide induces heme oxygenase-1 and dentin sialophosphoprotein mRNA in human pulp cells. J Endod 2008; 34: 983–989.

24.

Goldberg

Smith

. Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: a biological basis for repair and tissue engineering. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004; 15: 13–27.

25.

Kanno

Ishikawa

Takayanagi

. Exposure to hydrogen peroxide induces cell death via apoptosis in primary cultured mouse hepatocytes. Biol Pharm Bull 1999; 22: 1296–1300.

26.

Kanno

Shouji

Asou

. Effects of naringin on hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosisin P388 cells. J Pharmacol Sci 2003; 92: 166–170.

27.

Tersariol

Geraldeli

Minciotti

. Cysteine cathepsins in human dentin-pulp complex. J Endod 2010; 36: 475–481.

28.

Nascimento

Minciotti

Geraldeli

. Cysteine cathepsins in human carious dentin. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 506–511.

29.

Sato

Rodrigues

Garcia

. Tooth bleaching increases dentinal protease activity. J Dent Res 2013; 92: 187–192.

30.

Caviedes-Bucheli

Ariza-Garcia

Camelo

. The effect of glass ionomer and adhesive cements on substance P expression in human dental pulp. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: e896–e901.

31.

Scaffa

Vidal

Barros

. Chlorhexidine inhibits the activity of dental cysteine cathepsins. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 420–425.

32.

Cecarini

Gee

Fioretti

. Protein oxidation and cellular homeostasis: emphasis on metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Cell Res 2007; 1773: 93–104.

33.

Shackelford

Kaufmann

Paules

. Oxidative stress and cell cycle checkpoint function. Free Radic Biol Med 2000; 28: 1387–1404.

34.

Gökay

Müjdeci

Algin

. In vitro peroxide penetration into the pulp chamber from newer bleaching products. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 516–520.

35.

Esposito

Varvara

Murmura

. Ability of healthy and inflamed human dental pulp to reduce hydrogen peroxide. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 454–456.

36.

Dias Ribeiro

Sacono

Lessa

FCR

. Cytotoxic effect of a 35% hydrogen peroxide bleaching gel on odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology 2009; 108: 458–464.

37.

Bowles

Ugwuneri

. Pulp chamber penetration by hydrogen peroxide following vital bleaching procedures. J Endod 1987; 13: 375–377.

38.

Marson

Sensi

Vieira

LCC

. Clinical evaluation of in-office dental bleaching treatments with and without the use of light-activation sources. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 15–22.

39.

Poosti

Ahrari

Moosavi

. The effect of fractional CO₂ laser irradiation on remineralization of enamel white spot lesions. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 1349–1355.

40.

Kashima-Tanaka

Tsujimoto

Kawamoto

. Generation of free radicals and/or active oxygen by light or laser irradiation of hydrogen peroxide or sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2003; 29: 141–143.

41.

Robertson

Melfi

. Pulpal response to vital bleaching procedures. J Endod 1980; 6: 645–649.

42.

Vaz

Lopes

Cardoso

. Inflammatory response of human dental pulp to at-home and in-office tooth bleaching. J Appl Oral Sci 2016; 24: 509–517.

43.

Dantas

CMG

Vivan

Ferreira

. In vitro effect of low intensity laser on the cytotoxicity produced by substances released by bleaching gel. Braz Oral Res 2010; 24: 460–466.

44.

Moosavi

Arjmand

Ahrari

. Effect of low-level laser therapy on tooth sensitivity induced by in-office bleaching. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31: 713–719.

45.

Karu

Pyatibrat

Afanasyeva

. A novel mitochondrial signaling pathway activated by visible-to-near infrared radiation. Photochem Photobiol 2004; 80: 366–372.

46.

Lima

Ribeiro

APD

Basso

. Effect of low-level laser therapy on odontoblast-like cells exposed to bleaching agent. Lasers Med Sci 2014; 29: 1533–1538.

Evaluation of biochemical changes in dental tissues after different office bleaching methods

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study design

Group preparation

Teeth extraction and sample preparation

Proteolytic activities in dentin and pulp

Detection of ROS in dentin and pulp

Statistical analysis

Results

Cathepsin B test results

MMP test results

DCFDA (total ROS) test results

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References