Calabrese EJThe road to linearity: why linearity at low doses became the basis for carcinogen risk assessment. Arch Toxicol2009; 83: 203-225.
2.
Calabrese EJGetting the dose-response wrong: Why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted. Arch Toxicol2009; 83: 227-247.
3.
Calabrese EJHormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ Toxicol Chem2008 ; 27: 1451-1474.
4.
Calabrese EJHistorical blunders: how toxicology got the dose-response relationship half right. Cell Mol Biol2005; 51: 643-654.
5.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LAToxicology rethinks its central belief-hormesis demands a reappraisal of the way risks are assessed. Nature2003; 421: 691-692.
6.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LAApplications of hormesis in toxicology, risk assessment and chemotherapeutics. Trends Pharmacol Sci2002; 23: 331-337.
7.
Calabrese EJ , Baldwin LAHormesis: U-shaped dose responses and their centrality in toxicology. Trends Pharmacol Sci2001; 22:285-291.