4.3 In-vitro genotoxicity tests to detect carcinogenicity: a systematic review

1 Tennant RW  Margolin BH  Shelby MD  Zeiger E  Haseman JK  Spalding J  . Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays. Science 1987; 236: 933–941.

2 Haseman JK  Zeiger E  Shelby M  Margolin B  Tennant R  . Predicting rodent carcinogenicity from four in vitro genetic toxicity assays: an evaluation of 114 chemicals studied by the National Toxicology Program. J Am Stat Assoc 1990; 85: 964–971.

3 Kirkland DJ  Müller L  . Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results: the importance of thresholds. Mutat Res 2000; 464: 137–147.

4 Kirkland D  Pfuhler S  Tweats D  Aardema M  Corvi R  Daroudi F  . How to reduce false positive results with in vitro genotoxicity testing and avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: report of an ECVAM workshop. Mutat Res 2007; 628: 31–55.

5 Müller L  Kasper P  . Human biological relevance and the use of threshold-arguments in regulatory genotoxicity assessment: experience with pharmaceuticals. Mutat Res 2000; 464: 19–34.

6 Zeiger E  . Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises and performance. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1998; 28: 85–95.

7 Zeiger E  Haseman JK  Shelby MD  Margolin BH  Tennant RW  . Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 1990; 16(Suppl. 18): 1–14.

8 Kirkland D  Aardema M  Henderson L  Müller L  . Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens. I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Mutat Res 2005; 584: 1–256.

9 Matthews EJ  Kruhlak NL  Cimino MC  Benz RD  Contrera JF  . An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity and caricnogenicity data, II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants and carcinogens using in silico methods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006; 44: 97–110.

10 Kirkland D  Aardema M  Müller L  Hayashi M  . Evaluation of the ability of a battery of 3 in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens. II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. Mutat Res 2006; 608: 29–42.

12 JG Hardman  LE Limbird  AG Gilman  . Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.