Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals

Abstract

Industrial chemicals are needed for chemical synthesis or technical purposes. These beneficial effects are counterbalanced by the potential health risks for all who come into contact with them. The new chemical legislation of the EU, Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) will force the responsibility of manufacturers and importers of chemical substances to gather the right information needed to decide on the right circumstances of use and control of chemical substances and products.

In order to understand the roots of REACH, experiences gained with regard to existing chemicals legislation, particularly in Germany, will be reviewed. Since Council Directive 67/548/EEC all chemicals placed on the market need a set of standard information and provisions for safe transportation. This directive and its amendments (Council Directive(s) 79/831/EEC and 92/32/EEC) have established for new substances a sound information data basis for classification of dangerous properties. Under Council Regulation 793/93/EEC, regulations and administrative provisions have established the requirement to assess the risk to man and the environment of existing substances. So far, only 119 substances have been evaluated under the forces of this regulation. This separation has led to a substantial imbalance between existing substances and new substances with respect to available data needed to recognize hazards for health. The register of produced and imported chemical substances under REACH should eliminate some of this separation and will also be the key for selection of substances of very high concern by the authorization process to restrict the use and distribution accordingly.

Keywords

EU chemical legislation existing chemical substances initiatives to evaluate new notified substances reasons for REACH work load

References

1 EU. 2006: Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and the European Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Regulation 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 93/793 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/677/EEC, 93/105/EEC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal. No L 2006 ; 369: p 0001–0849.

2 Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal 196, 16/08/1967, p 0001–0098.

5 Council Directive 92/32/EEC of 30 April 1992 amending for the seventh time Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal L 154, 05/06/1992: p. 0001–0029.

8 Hansen BG van Haelst AG van Leeuwen K van der Zandt P . Priority setting for existing chemical: european union risk ranking method . Environ Toxicol Chem 1999; 18: 772 – 779 .

10.

10 GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance . (BUA) (Ed.) 009 BUA-Report: o-Nitroanisole. CAS-No. 91-23-6; ISBN 978-3-7776-0533-3; S. Hirzel Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart , 1987.

11.

11 GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance . (BUA) (Ed.) 114 BUA-Report: Supplementary Reports I. ISBN 978-3-7776-0717-7; S. Hirzel Wissenschafliche Verlagsgesellschaft Stuttgart , 1993.

12.

13.

13 Greim H . Peer Review von ICCA-Stoffen im BUA . Mitteilungen der Fachgruppe Umweltchemie und Ökotoxikologie 2003; 9: 9 – 11 .

14.

14 Greim H Ahlers J Bias R Broecker B Gamer AO Gelbke HP . Priority setting for the evaluation of existing chemicals. The approach of the German advisory committee on existing chemicals of environmental relevance (BUA) . Chemosphere 1993; 26: 1653 – 1666 .

15.

15 GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance . (BUA) (Ed.) 180 BUA report (Short reports) : C10-C21-Alkane sulfonic acid phenyl esters CAS No-No. 91082-17-6; ISBN 3-7776-0832-7 S. Hirzel Wissenschafliche Verlagsgesellschaft , 1998.

16.

16 GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance . (BUA) (Ed.) 237 BUA-Report: Supplementary Reports VIII. ISBN 978-3-7776-1298-0; S. Hirzel Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft , 2004.

17.

17 GDCh-Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance . (BUA) (Ed. ) 103 BUA-Report: Acrylamide CAS-No. 79-06-1; ISBN 978-3-7776-0649-1; S. Hirzel Wissenschafliche Verlagsgesellschaft , 1995.

18.

18 Greim H Ahlers J Bias R Broecker B Hollander H Gelbke HJ . Toxicity and ecotoxicity of sulfonic acids: Structure-activity relationship . Chemosphere 1994; 28: 2203 – 2236 .

19.

19 Greim H Ahlers J Bias R Broecker B Hollander H Gelbke HP . Assessment of structurally related chemicals: Toxicity and ecotoxicity of acrylic acid and acrylic acid alkylesters (acrylates), methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid alkyl esters (methacrylates) . Chemosphere 1995; 31: 2637 – 2659 .

20.

20 Greim H Bury D Klimisch HJ Oeben-Negele M Ziegler-Skylakakis K . Toxicity of aliphatic amines: Structure-activity relationship . Chemosphere 1998; 36: 271 – 295 .

21.

21 Bickers DR Calow P Greim HA Hanifin JM Rogers AE Saurat JH . The safety assessment of fragrance materials . Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2003; 37: 218 – 273 .

22.

22 DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) . MAK und BAT-Werte-Liste. 2005; Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. Mitteilung der Senatskommission zur Prüfung Gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe 41.

23.

24.

24 Richtlinie 1999/45/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 31. Mai 1999 zur Angleichung der Rechts- und Verwaltungsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten für die Einstufung, Verpackung und Kennzeichnung gefährlicher Zubereitungen (ersetzt 88/379/EWG): Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Nr. L 200 vom 30.7. 1999; 1–96.

25.

25 Simon-Hettich B Rothfuss A Steger-Hartmann T . Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances . Toxicology 2006; 224: 156 – 162 .

26.

26 Héritier A . New modes of governance in Europe: Increasing political efficiency and policy effectiveness. In: T Börzel R Cichowski , (eds), Law, politics, and society. The state of the European Union, vol. 6. Oxford : Oxford University Press ; 2003. p. 107–126

27.

27 Neyer J . Discource and Order in the EU . Journal of Common Market Studies 2003; 41: 687 – 706 .

28.

28 Risse T . Global governance and communicative action . Government and Opposition 2004; 39: 288 – 313 .

29.

29 Foth H; Hayes W; . Concept of REACH and impact on evaluation of chemicals. Hum Exp Toxicol 2008; 27: 5–21.

30.

31.

31 Hengstler JG Foth H Kramer PJ Kahl R Lilienblum W Schulz T . The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences . Toxicology 2006; 220: 232 – 239 .