Rozman KK, Doul J.Scientific foundations of hormesis. Part 2. Maturation, strengths, limitations, and possible applications in toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology. Crit Rev Toxicol2003; 33(3—4): 451—62.
2.
Bergkamp L., Hanekamp JCThe Draft REACH Regime: costs and benefits of precautionary chemical regulation . Environ Liability2003; 5: 167—80.
3.
Sunstein CRPrecautions against what? The availability heuristic and cross-cultural risk perceptions. John M. Olin Law and Economics, University of Chicago Law School, Working Paper No. 20, 2004: 13.
4.
The European perspective: Commission of the European Communities.Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Brussels, 2000.
5.
Burgess A.Flattering consumption. Creating a Europe of the consumer. J ConsumCult2001; 1(1): 93—117.
6.
Ulrich B.Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp, 1986.
7.
Stenmark M.Rationality in science, religion, and everyday life. A critical evaluation of four models of rationality. University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.
8.
Oreskes N., Schrader-Frechette K., Belitz K.Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science1994; 263: 641—6.
9.
Jones WEIs scientific theory-commitment doxastic or practical. Synthese2003; 137: 325—44.
10.
Newton-Smith WHThe rationality of science. Routledge, 1981, p. 75 (Calabrese and co-workers in fact have shown that full theory-commitment that side-steps proportionality and tentativity does pay off!).
11.
Axelrod D., Burns K., Davis D., Von Larebeke N. `Hormesis' — An inappropriate extrapolation from the specific to the universal. Int J Environ Health2004 ; 10: 335—9.
12.
Hanekamp JC , Verstegen SW, Vera—Navas G.The historical roots of precautionary thinking: the cultural ecological critique and `The Limits to Growth'. J Risk Res2005; 8(4): 295—310.
Barnard RCA new approach to risk assessment integrating scientific evaluation and economic assessment of costs and benefits. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol1996; 24: 121—5.
15.
Gori GBScience, imaginable risks, and public policy: anatomy of a mirage. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol1996; 23: 304—11.
