Charcoal shape variations provide insight into past fuel types burned, with charcoal length:width (L:W) being the most popular means of distinguishing fuel types. This paper presents morphometric data (L:W) of charcoal produced from plant taxa (n = 21) native to the southeastern United States of America (USA). These taxa included monocots (n = 3), dicots (n = 12), and gymnosperms (n = 6), which represented a range of growth habits including graminoids, trees, shrubs, and subshrubs. We further divided these taxa into tissues (n = 36 total samples) which included leaves, wood, bark, needles, stems, and a seed pod. Our results show that charcoal produced from plants native to southeastern USA exhibits more variable L:W values than those tested in previous research, but that when aggregated, they broadly agree with published L:W value ranges. Within the dicot group, leaves produced charcoal lower L:W values (median = 1.92, interquartile range (IQR) = 1.33) than wood (median = 2.43, IQR = 3.00), whereas the opposite was true for gymnosperms whose needles produced greater L:W values (median = 2.60, IQR = 3.22) than wood (median = 1.93, IQR = 1.44). The monocot graminoid we tested produced greater L:W values (median = 3.47, IQR = 6.02) than dicot or gymnosperm fuels. Further, our results provide conflicting perspectives on the likelihood of evolutionary relationships as the cause of variations in charcoal L:W values. Last, our results underscore the importance of site-specific experimental charcoal approaches to enable robust paleofire applications of charcoal morphometry.
AlemanJCBlarquezOBentalebI, et al. (2013) Tracking Land-Cover Changes With Sedimentary Charcoal in the Afrotropics. The Holocene, vol. 23. London, England: Sage Publications Sage UK, pp.1853–1862.
2.
AndersonLPresnetsovaLWahlDB, et al. (2023) Assessing reproducibility in sedimentary macroscopic charcoal count data. Quaternary Research111: 177–196.
3.
BernaboJCWebbT (1977) Changing patterns in the Holocene pollen record of northeastern North America: A Mapped Summary. Quaternary Research8(1): 64–96.
4.
BlarquezOTalbotJPaillardJ, et al. (2018) Late Holocene influence of societies on the fire regime in southern Québec temperate forests. Quaternary Science Reviews180: 63–74.
5.
BondWJWoodwardFIMidgleyGF (2005) The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. New Phytologist165(2): 525–538.
6.
BowmanDMBalchJKArtaxoP, et al. (2009) Fire in the Earth System. Science324(5926): 481–484.
7.
BowmanDMJSKoldenCAAbatzoglouJT, et al. (2020) Vegetation fires in the anthropocene. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment1(10): 500–515.
8.
BrownKDietzeEWalshM, et al. (2023) Charred particles and other paleofire proxies. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier.
9.
BrownKJHebdaNJConderN, et al. (2017) Changing climate, vegetation, and fire disturbance in a sub-boreal pine-dominated forest, British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research47(5): 615–627.
10.
ClarkJSLynchJStocksBJ, et al. (1998) Relationships between charcoal particles in air and sediments in west-central Siberia. Holocene8(1): 19–29.
11.
ConederaMTinnerWNeffC, et al. (2009) Reconstructing past fire regimes: Methods, applications, and relevance to fire management and conservation. Quaternary Science Reviews28(5-6): 555–576.
12.
CrawfordAJBelcherCM (2014) Charcoal morphometry for paleoecological analysis: The effects of fuel type and transportation on morphological parameters. Applications in Plant Sciences2(8): 1400004.
13.
EnacheMDCummingBF (2006) Tracking recorded fires using charcoal morphology from the sedimentary sequence of Prosser Lake, British Columbia (Canada). Quaternary Research65(02): 282–292.
14.
FeurdeanA (2021) Experimental production of charcoal morphologies to discriminate fuel source and fire type: An example from Siberian taiga. Biogeosciences Discussions18: 3805–3821.
15.
FeurdeanAVachulaRSHanganuD, et al. (2023) Charcoal morphologies and morphometrics of a Eurasian grass-dominated system for robust interpretation of past fuel and fire type. Biogeosciences20(24): 5069–5085.
16.
FlanniganMDKrawchukMAde GrootWJ, et al. (2009) Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire18(5): 483.
17.
Frank-DePueLVachulaRSBalascioNL, et al. (2023) Trends in sedimentary charcoal shapes correspond with broad-scale land-use changes: Insights gained from a 300-year lake sediment record from eastern Virginia, USA. Journal of Paleolimnology69: 21–36.
18.
HarrisRMBRemenyiTAWilliamsonGJ, et al. (2016) Climate–vegetation–fire interactions and feedbacks: Trivial detail or major barrier to projecting the future of the Earth system?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change7(6): 910–931.
19.
HarveyAMosherSPowerM (2023) Analysis of charcoal morphometrics from known Utah plants may inform fire and vegetation history reconstructions. RANGE: Undergraduate Research Journal 24(1).
20.
HedgesJIMannDC (1979) The characterization of plant tissues by their lignin oxidation products. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta43(11): 1803–1807.
21.
HennebelleAAlemanJCAliAA, et al. (2020) The reconstruction of burned area and fire severity using charcoal from boreal lake sediments. Holocene30(10): 1400–1409.
22.
HigueraPPetersMBrubakerL, et al. (2007) Understanding the origin and analysis of sediment-charcoal records with a simulation model. Quaternary Science Reviews26: 1790–1809.
23.
JensenKLynchEACalcoteR, et al. (2007) Interpretation of charcoal morphotypes in sediments from Ferry Lake, Wisconsin, USA: Do different plant fuel sources produce distinctive charcoal morphotypes?Holocene17(7): 907–915.
24.
KrauseTRRussellJMZhangR, et al. (2019) Late quaternary vegetation, climate, and fire history of the Southeast Atlantic Coastal Plain based on a 30,000-yr multi-proxy record from White Pond, South Carolina, USA. Quaternary Research91(2): 861–880.
25.
LashleyMAChitwoodMCPrinceA, et al. (2014) Subtle effects of a managed fire regime: A case study in the longleaf pine ecosystem. Ecological Indicators38: 212–217.
26.
LeysBBrewerSCMcConaghyS, et al. (2015) Fire history reconstruction in grassland ecosystems: Amount of charcoal reflects local area burned. Environmental Research Letters10(11): 114009.
27.
LeysBACommerfordJLMcLauchlanKK (2017) Reconstructing grassland fire history using sedimentary charcoal: Considering count, size and shape. PLos One12(4): e0176445.
28.
LeysBAMarlonJRUmbanhowarC, et al. (2018) From dispersal to predation: A global synthesis of ant–seed interactions. Ecology andEvolution8(18): 9122–9138.
29.
LiCLiGLiRC, et al. (2019) Study on the ratio of microcharcoal particles to phytoliths derived from plant combustion. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica36(01): 83–90.
30.
LupienRSliwinskaKK (2024) Biomarker indicators of past ecosystems. In: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99931-1.00204-X
31.
MarlonJR (2020) What the past can say about the present and future of fire. Quaternary Research96: 66–87.
32.
MasielloCA (2004) New directions in black carbon organic geochemistry. Marine Chemistry 92(1-4): 201–213.
33.
McLauchlanKKHigueraPEMieselJ, et al. (2020) Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers. Journal of Ecology108(5): 2047–2069.
34.
McMichaelCNHHeijinkBMBushMB, et al. (2021) On the scaling and standardization of charcoal data in paleofire reconstructions. Frontiers of Biogeography13(1): e49431.
35.
MoritzMAParisienM-ABatlloriE, et al. (2012) Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. Ecosphere3(6): 1–22.
36.
MustaphiCJCPisaricMFJ (2014) A classification for macroscopic charcoal morphologies found in Holocene lacustrine sediments. Progress in Physical Geography38(6): 734–754.
37.
OguraJ (2007) A study on the identification of original plants of minute charcoal fragments. Japanese journal of historical botany. 日本植生史学会15(2): 85–95.
38.
OlsonDMDinersteinEWikramanayakeED, et al. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience51(11): 933–938.
39.
OswaldWWFosterDRShumanBN, et al. (2020) Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England. Nature Sustainability3(3): 241–246.
40.
OverpeckJTWebbRSWebb IiiT (1992) Mapping eastern North American vegetation change of the past 18 ka: No-analogs and the future. Geology20(12): 1071–1074.
41.
PattersonWAEdwardsKJMaguireDJ (1987) Microscopic charcoal as a fossil indicator of fire. Quaternary Science Reviews6(1): 3–23.
42.
PereboomEMVachulaRSHuangY, et al. (2020) The morphology of experimentally produced charcoal distinguishes fuel types in the Arctic tundra. Holocene30(7): 1091–1096.
43.
PetersMEHigueraPE (2007) Quantifying the source area of macroscopic charcoal with a particle dispersal model. Quaternary Research67(2): 304–310.
44.
PowerMJMarlonJRBartleinPJ, et al. (2010) Fire history and the Global charcoal Database: A new tool for hypothesis testing and data exploration. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology291(1-2): 52–59.
45.
RehnERoweCUlmS, et al. (2021) Multiproxy Holocene fire records from the tropical savannas of northern Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, Australia. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution9: 16.
46.
RoosCI (2020) Scale in the study of Indigenous burning. Nature Sustainability3(11): 898–899.
47.
ScoteseCRSongHMillsBJW, et al. (2021) Phanerozoic paleotemperatures: The earth’s changing climate during the last 540 million years. Earth-Science Reviews215: 103503.
48.
SnitkerG (2018) Identifying natural and anthropogenic drivers of prehistoric fire regimes through simulated charcoal records. Journal of Archaeological Science95: 1–15.
49.
SnitkerG (2020) The charcoal quantification tool (CharTool): A suite of open-source tools for quantifying charcoal fragments and sediment properties in archaeological and paleoecological analysis. Ethnobiology Letters11(1): 103–115.
50.
ThonickeKVenevskySSitchS, et al. (2001) The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: Coupling fire into a dynamic global vegetation model. Global Ecology and Biogeography10(6): 661–677.
51.
TsakiridouMCunninghamLHardimanM (2021) Toward a standardized procedure for charcoal analysis. Quaternary Research99: 329–340.
52.
UmbanhowarCEMcGrathMJ (1998) Experimental production and analysis of microscopic charcoal from wood, leaves and grasses. Holocene8(3): 341–346.
53.
VachulaRS (2019) A usage-based size classification scheme for sedimentary charcoal. Holocene29(3): 523–527.
54.
VachulaRS (2021) A meta-analytical approach to understanding the charcoal source area problem. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology562: 110111.
55.
VachulaRSRehnE (2023) Modeled dispersal patterns for wood and grass charcoal are different: Implications for paleofire reconstruction. Holocene33: 166.
56.
VachulaRSRichterN (2018) Informing sedimentary charcoal-based fire reconstructions with a kinematic transport model. Holocene28(1): 173–178.
57.
VachulaRSRussellJMHuangY, et al. (2018) Assessing the spatial fidelity of sedimentary charcoal size fractions as fire history proxies with a high-resolution sediment record and historical data. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology508: 166–175.
58.
VachulaRSSae-LimJLiR (2021) A critical appraisal of charcoal morphometry as a paleofire fuel type proxy. Quaternary Science Reviews262: 106979.
59.
VachulaRSSheppardRYCheungAH (2022) Preservation biases are pervasive in Holocene paleofire records. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology602: 111165.
60.
WenMLiRVachulaRS, et al. (2020) The ratio of microcharcoal to phytolith content in soils as a new proxy of fire activity. Holocene30: 1567–1578.
61.
WhitlockCMillspaughSH (1996) Testing the Assumptions of Fire-History Studies: An Examination of Modern Charcoal Accumulation in Yellowstone National Park, USA. The Holocene, vol. 6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA, pp.7–15.
62.
ZhangJLuH (2006) Preliminary study of charcoal morphology and its environmental significance. Quaternary Sciences26(5): 857–863.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
