Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Quaternary small mammals are important proxies for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. The Brazilian record, although famous and continuously growing, is hampered by poor chronological control due to the nature of most of the published assemblages. Here, we present a taphonomic analysis and paleoenvironmental reconstruction based on marsupials, bats, and rodents (480 remains) from the Gruta do Presépio archeological site (GPR, hereafter), Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. The site is a rock shelter located in an Atlantic Forest biome, an important biodiversity hotspot. The GPR sedimentary sequence spans the Early Holocene (8330 ± 30 years ¹⁴C BP) to recent Historical time (after the arrival of Europeans). Most of the small mammal remains were deposited by strigiforms, although for the oldest units some strongly digested remains could indicate the activity of diurnal birds or carnivorous mammals. The GPR small mammal assemblages include 28 taxa (five marsupials, nine chiropterans, and 14 rodents). Most of them indicate the occurrence and persistence of forested environments during the Holocene around the site, which is in overall agreement with regional palynological data. A major community change, implying the increment of rodents allied to disturbed ecosystems (e.g. Akodon, Oligoryzomys, Mus), is very recent and reflects human forest clearance as a signature of the Anthropocene.

Keywords

Atlantic Forest marsupials Muridae paleoenvironments Sigmodontinae taphonomy

Introduction

Small mammals are suitable proxies for paleoenvironmental and, to a minor extent, paleoclimatic reconstructions, particularly during the Quaternary (e.g. Andrews, 1990; Avery, 1982; Guillermo et al., 2021; Hadly, 1996; Pardiñas et al., 2022; Thackeray, 1987; Wood and Barnosky, 1994). Taphonomic studies of micromammal remains are important for inferring the main sources of the faunal accumulation, embracing a variety of agents and processes, in order to perform supported reconstructions of the past (e.g. Andrews, 1990; Avery, 1982; Dodson and Wexlar, 1979; Fernández et al., 2019; Guillermo et al., 2021; Montalvo and Fernández, 2019; Pardiñas, 1999b; Stahl, 1996).

For Brazilian cave deposits, foundational studies on the Neotropical Quaternary small mammals and taphonomy have been undertaken. In fact, it was Peter Lund working in the extensive karst system of Lagoa Santa (Minas Gerais) who carried out the first experiments regarding the time implied in the formation of a bony deposit produced by owls and, more precisely, to connect the latter with cave ossuaries (Lund, 1846). During the last two decades, descriptions of numerous Quaternary small mammal assemblages have been published for the country (e.g. de Oliviera et al., 2013; Hadler et al., 2018; Motta et al., 2019; Neves et al., 2017, 2020). However, many of them are limited to taxonomic aspects because they lack, due to the nature of the deposits (e.g. karst systems), a precise chronological framework (e.g. Boroni et al., 2021; Pires et al., 2018). Fortunately, in southern Brazil, several Holocene assemblages from Rio Grande do Sul State have been retrieved from archeological sites with firmly established stratigraphy and absolute dates (Fernández et al., 2019; Hadler et al., 2008, 2009, 2010, 2016; Stutz et al., 2017, 2020a). These findings indicate that both owls and humans were the main accumulating agents of small mammals (Fernández et al., 2019). In addition, the studied sites revealed a clear tendency toward the replacement and regional extinction of grassland species by forest species toward the Late-Holocene (Hadler et al., 2016; Stutz et al., 2017, 2020a).

Recently, a small mammal assemblage from the Holocene of Santa Catarina State, in southern Brazil, was recovered. This state is situated in the Atlantic Forest biome, an important biodiversity hotspot (Marques et al., 2021; Myers et al., 2000). Understanding how this biome will respond to changing conditions in the future is a research priority (Wilson et al., 2021). One way to answer this question is to look at the past, via fossil proxies, to identify the impact of past climate change on the organisms (Fordham et al., 2020; Wilson et al., 2021).

The goal of this paper is to describe this sequence of archeological small mammal assemblages collected from a cave named Gruta do Presépio. Beyond the rich taxonomic sample represented by the studied assemblages, special attention is given to taphonomic analysis and paleoenvironmental reconstruction to assess the effect of past climate change on these micromammal communities.

Archeological context

Gruta do Presépio (GPR, hereafter) is part of an archeological complex comprising three other sites, named Gruta do Tigre, Fenda do Tigre, and Oficina do Tigre, in the municipality of Rio do Oeste, State of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil (27°13′10.50″S, 49°46′ 38.97″W, 442 m asl, Figure 1). GPR is a rock shelter 35 m wide at its mouth and 17 m long that was eroded into a shale outcrop of the Rio do Sul Formation overlain by sandstone of the Rio Bonito Formation (Ballejo et al., 2022; Machado et al., 2019). Eleven archeological units measuring 1 × 1 m and one measuring 1 m × 50 cm were excavated at GPR. The stratigraphy recorded is composed of nine layers differentiated by sedimentological and cultural features (Ballejo et al., 2022; Machado et al., 2019). Layer I was sterile. From layers II to IX a variety of remains were collected, with clear concentrations in layers II and III and VII to IX. The main archeological remains that were detected in all these layers were lithic tools and debris made of sandstone, silicified sandstone, chert, quartzite, and basalt, totaling 238 artifacts (Pereira, 2021). Layers II and III presented an extensive amount of charcoal, ash and burnt sediment, and are rich in fluvial shells, but with a low density of lithic artifacts and other faunal remains (Pereira, 2021).

Figure 1.

(a) Location of the state of Santa Catarina in South America. (b) Location of Gruta do Presépio in Vale do Itajaí, scale 1:10,000,000. (c) Surrounding topography, scale 1:40,000. (d) Map of the cave and excavation areas, adapted from Machado et al. (2019). (e) Stratigraphic profile of north view of the excavation unit N10 L 50 and N10 L51. Data: ALOS PALSAR, IBGE, ANA, CPRM, Machado et al. (2019) and Pereira (2021).

In the archeological complex, dates were obtained only for GPR (Table 1), and point to an extensive, but not continuous, interval of occupation. We defined three main periods of occupation of the site based on stratigraphic and cultural characteristics. The first period, the Early Holocene, presents dates between 8330 and 7750 years BP and covers layers II and III. The second, related to the Mid/Late-Holocene, involves layers IV, V, and VI and has a hiatus between 4150 and 1450 years BP. The third period encompasses layers VII to IX, dating to after the 16th century and being defined based on the occurrence of the exotic rodent Mus musculus starting from layer VII. This chronology, although lacking refinement, inserts GPR into a broader context of occupation in southern Brazil (Dias, 2012; Hadler et al., 2013), adding to the discussion surrounding other areas of the upper Itajaí valley (Reis et al., 2018). These chronological intervals refer to occupations by hunter-gatherer groups from the Early and Mid-Holocene and to the context of occupations linked to southern Jê groups, which began to occupy hillside and plateau areas in southern Brazil at around 3000 years BP (Noelli and Souza, 2017).

Table 1.

Units of analysis, stratigraphy and chronology of Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil); calibration was made using the CALIB 8.2 program.

Units of analysis	Temporal units	Layers	Sedimentary composition	Main dates ¹⁴C BP	Cal BP (2-sigma)	Cal BP (X probability)	Context	Reference
GPR3	Historical times	IX	Sand-silty				Mus musculus	This work
		VIII	Sand-silty
		VII	Sand-silty
GPR2	Middle-Late-Holocene	VI	Sand-silty	1450 ± 30	1277–1360	1309	Hearth	Ballejo et al. (2022)
		V	Sand-silty	4150 ± 30	4521–4731	4644	Hearth	Machado et al. (2019)
		IV	Sand-clayey
GPR1	Early Holocene	III	Sand-clayey	7900 ± 30	8545–8778	8649	Hearth	Machado et al. (2019)
		II	Sand-clayey	8330 ± 30	9194–9429	9308	Hearth	Machado et al. (2019)
		I	Sand-clayey

The low density of archeological remains associated with the configuration of the fire structures points to an ephemeral use of GPR, with short occupations interspersed with long periods of abandonment. In the Early Holocene, there is more ash, charcoal, and burnt sediment than in other periods, indicating a more intense occupation of the shelter at this time. New excavations are planned to advance the identification of possible areas of activity that could contribute to a better definition of the dynamics of use and formation of the internal space of this site.

Mammal bones were retrieved from layers II to IX. Ballejo et al. (2022) found evidence of scavenger action by New World vultures (Cathartidae) on mammal bone assemblages (NISP = 144 belonging to Dasypus sp., Felidae, Cervidae, and Tayassuidae indet.) recovered from some of the grids located at the entrance of GPR (see Ballejo et al., 2022: fig. 1d and fig. 3). In the same and other grids, medium and large-sized mammals (Cervidae, Tapirus terrestris, Dasypus sp., Puma concolor, and Eira barbara) were also found with evidence of human exploitation (Fernández, personal observation). The mammal assemblage contained in the pellets regurgitated by Cathartidae were found together with other mammal remains discarded by humans that lived in GPR from the Early to Late-Holocene (see Ballejo et al., 2022: fig. 6).

The GPR stratigraphy and chronology are summarized in Table 1. Understanding the gap between the Late-Holocene ages (4150 and 1450 years BP) depends on further dating and excavating more areas.

GPR is located in the Atlantic Forest biome (IBGE, 2019), and the local surrounding vegetation is tropical rainforest of the Alto Vale do Itajaí. This forest is poor in tropical trees, showing great homogeneity in dominant species, such Ocotea spp., Aspidosperma olivaceum, and Copaifera trapezifolia, which present a greater abundance and frequency (Klein, 1978). Currently, only small remnants of this forest type exist in the area, because it has been progressively converted to agricultural land during the last five centuries (Galindo-Leal and Camara, 2003; Vibrans et al., 2012). The climate is mild mesothermal, with average temperatures between 10°C and 15°C, super humid, and without periods of drought (IBGE, 2002).

Material and methods

The sediments extracted from GPR were sieved on site through 2 and 4 mm-sized mesh, and the micromammal remains were separated by manual picking and cleaned with brushes and histology needles. For all layers, constant volume samples were taken, and, in the case of fire structures, full sediment collection was carried out. These samples were floated at the laboratory, and the heavy and light fraction samples were sorted to identify archeological and faunal remains. The studied material, grouped in three chronologically ordered major samples (Table 1), includes 128 fragments of skulls (GPR 1 = 12, GPR 2 = 68, GPR 3 = 48), 77 isolated teeth (GPR 1 = 20, GPR 2 = 41, GPR 3 = 16), and 275 postcranial elements (GPR 1 = 52, GPR 2 = 174, GPR 3 = 49). These remains are housed at the Coleção Arqueológica of the Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia (MArquE) of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.

Only crania and dentaries were used for taxonomy. Identifications were made by comparison with voucher specimens from the Coleção de Mamíferos of the Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia of the UFSC and of the Seção de Mastozoologia of the Museu de Ciências Naturais da Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente e Infraestrutura, as well as the literature (e.g. Barquez et al., 1999; Cherem et al., 2018; Emmons and Vucetich, 1998; Gardner, 2008; Medellin, 1989; Patton et al., 2015; Stutz et al., 2020a; Voss and Jansa, 2009). The studied material is listed in Supplemental Appendix 1, available online and the specimens used for comparison in Supplemental Appendix 2, available online. The taxonomic framework employed here follows Gardner (2008) for marsupials and bats, and Patton et al. (2015) for rodents. The number of identified specimens (NISP) and the minimum number of individuals (MNI) per taxon were calculated according to Grayson (1984). The NISP was used to access taxonomic abundance (Lyman, 2018). The photographs were taken with the Scanning Electron Microscope in the Laboratório Central de Microscopia Eletrônica of the UFSC.

Paleoenvironmental inferences were supported by comparisons (i.e. presence/absence, relative abundance variation through time) between fossil and recent small mammal assemblages, taking into account the ecological requirements of recorded taxa (e.g. Avery, 1982; Hadly, 1996; Pardiñas, 1999a). The composition of the contemporary community was based on a pellet sample (MNI = 261) produced by the owl Tyto furcata recovered from a nest in the opening of GPR. These materials are housed at the Coleção de Fragmentos Ósseos of the Laboratório de Paleontologia of the UFSC.

Taphonomic analysis was focused on digestive corrosion, breakage, and the relative abundance of elements. The digestive corrosion was considered according to the four categories of damage (light, moderate, heavy, and extreme) described by Andrews (1990), Fernández et al. (2017a), and Montalvo and Fernández (2019) for teeth (isolated and in situ incisors and molars) and postcranial elements (proximal epiphysis of humerus and distal epiphysis of femur). The breakage pattern was identified following the scheme formulated by Andrews (1990). Finally, the relative abundance of each skeletal element was calculated using the formula proposed by Dodson and Wexlar (1979): %Ri = [MNEi/(MNI × Ei)] × 100, where Ri is the relative abundance of the element i; MNE is the minimum number of element i observed in the sample; MNI is the minimum number of individuals; and Ei is the number of the element i in a complete skeleton. Post-depositional features, including weathering, root-marks, and cement crusts, were also analyzed. Weathering was evaluated on a scale from 0 (not weathered) to 3 (extremely weathered) following the stages proposed by Andrews (1990). Root-marks on the bone surface along with cement crusts were classified considering their presence/absence on studied remains. For the cement crust, the petrographic analysis of aggregate sediments (mounted on stubs and coated with gold) was conducted on a JOEL Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope at the Laboratório Central de Microscopia Eletrônica of the UFSC. An accelerating voltage of 5 kV was used to obtain high-magnification images, and 10 kV was used while carrying out Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analyses.

Results

Taphonomy

Tables 2 to 4 summarize the main taphonomic attributes recorded in the studied samples. Of the analyzed remains (femora, humeri, incisors, and molars = 427; Table 3), 9.1% showed signs of digestive corrosion, with some variations per unit (GPR 1 = 9.4%; GPR 2 = 12.7%; GPR 3 = 3.9%). In all units, most elements were included in the light category, displaying sparse pitting on bone surfaces and enamel reduction or loss of shine (Figure 2a and b). However, some bones and teeth were more damaged (Figure 2c and d), and even a few teeth from GPR 2 and GPR 3 were strongly affected by digestion (Figure 2e –h).

Table 2.

Minimum Number of Elements (MNE) and relative abundance (%Ri) of each skeletal element for each archeological sample of Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

	GPR 1		GPR 2		GPR 3
	MNE	%Ri	MNE	%Ri	MNE	%Ri
Dentary	8	36.4	51	70.8	39	69.6
Maxilla	4	18.2	17	23.6	9	16.1
Scapula	0	0	4	5.6	0	0
Humerus	4	18.2	9	12.5	2	3.6
Radius	1	4.5	5	6.9	2	3.6
Ulna	5	22.7	7	9.7	1	1.8
Pelvis	2	9.1	9	12.5	4	7.1
Femur	12	54.5	17	23.6	8	14.3
Tibia	20	90.9	30	43.1	12	21.4
Vertebra	4	18.2	72	100.0	11	19.6
Incisor	17	77.3	40	55.6	16	28.6
Molar	3	13.6	1	1.4	0	0
Metapodial	2	9.1	2	2.8	1	1.8
Phalange	0	0.0	12	16.7	8	14.3
Calcaneus	1	4.5	6	8.3	1	1.8
Astragalus	0	0.0	0	0	0	0
Rib	1	4.5	0	0	0	0
Total	84		282		114

Table 3.

Digestion in teeth (incisors and molars) and postcranial bones (femur and humerus) for each archeological sample of Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

	GPR1			GPR2				GPR3
	WD	L	M	WD	L	M	H	WD	L	M	H
Incisor digested in situ	4	0	0	10	0	1	1	31	0	0	1
Incisor digested isolated	17	0	0	31	7	0	2	16	0	0	0
Molar digested in situ	13	0	0	130	3	2	6	94	0	1	1
Molar digested isolated	3	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Femur (proximal)	7	3	2	13	4	0	0	5	1	2	0
Humerus (distal)	4	0	0	7	2	0	0	2	0	0	0
Total	48	3	2	192	16	3	9	148	1	3	2

WD: without digestion; L: light; M: moderate; H: heavy.

Table 4.

Category of breakage (sensu Andrews, 1990) for each archeological sample of Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

	GPR 1		GPR 2		GPR 3
	N	%	N	%	N	%
Breakage of skull
Complete	0	0	0	0	0	0
Maxillary with zygomatic	0	0	0	0	0	0
Maxillary without zygomatic	3	100	19	100	8	100
Breakage of dentary
Complete dentary	0	0	1	2.09	0	0
Ascendant ramus broken	0	0	3	6.25	0	0
Without ascendant ramus	3	42.86	16	33.33	20	51.28
Inferior edge broken	4	57.14	28	58.33	19	48.72
Long bones breakage categories
Femur
Complete	1	8.33	9	52.94	4	50
Proximal	9	75	8	47.06	3	37.5
Shaft	1	8.33	0	0	1	12.5
Distal	1	8.33	0	0	0	0
Tibia
Complete	5	25	6	19.35	2	16.67
Proximal	4	20	7	22.58	1	8.33
Shaft	4	20	3	9.68	2	16.67
Distal	7	35	15	48.39	7	58.33
Humerus
Complete	4	100	5	55.56	2	100
Proximal	0	0	0	0	0	0
Shaft	0	0	0	0	0	0
Distal	0	0	4	44.44	0	0
Ulna
Complete	2	40	2	28.57	1	100
Proximal	3	60	5	71.43	0	0
Shaft	0	0	0	0	0	0
Distal	0	0	0	0	0	0
Radius
Complete	1	100	4	80	2	100
Proximal	0	0	1	20	0	0
Shaft	0	0	0	0	0	0
Distal	0	0	0	0	0	0

Figure 2.

Taphonomic features of the material from Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil). (a) Incisive of Sigmodontinae (GPR 2). (b) Detail of the light digestion. (c) Femur of Sigmodontinae (GPR 1). (d) Detail of the moderate digestion. (e) Left dentary of Sooretamys angouya (GPR 2). (f) Detail of the heavy digestion on m1. (g) Right dentary of Monodelphis scalops (GPR 3). (h) Detail of the heavy digestion. (i) Right dentary of Gracilinanus microtarsus (GPR 3) with roots marks. (j) Rostral part of the cranium of Juliomys sp. (GPR 2) with cement deposition. (k) Right dentary of G. microtarsus (GPR 2) with cement deposition.

Most of the bones (80.4%) were broken, showing sharp edges and rough surfaces, in all units (Table 4). All crania were heavily fractured (only the maxillae were preserved) and just one dentary was complete, while most lacked the ascending rami. In addition, 63.2% of the analyzed postcranial bones were broken (Table 4).

The relative abundance of skeletal elements reveals a high frequency of dentaries, maxillae, tibiae, and femora (Figure 3). The average of the relative abundance was very low in all units (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Relative frequency of each skeletal element for each archeological sample of Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

Considering the post-depositional processes, neither weathering nor abrasion produced by water/wind transport were registered in the samples analyzed. Conversely, bones with root etching were found (Figure 2i), mainly in GPR 2 (GPR 1 = 3.1%; GPR 2 = 9.8%; GPR 3 = 0.4%). In addition, bones and teeth with cement crusts were recorded in all units (Figure 2j and k), mostly in the upper one (GPR 1 = 6.9%; GPR 2 = 7.3%; GPR 3 = 12.3%). The analysis by EDX revealed the main constituent minerals of the sediments adhered to the surface of the bones to be gypsum (CaSO₄·2H₂O), fluorapatite (Ca₅(PO₄)₃F), illite (K, H₃O)(Al, Mg, Fe)₂ (Si, Al)₄O₁₀[(OH)₂·(H₂O)], feldspars, detrital, and diagenetic quartz (SiO₂), and Ti-oxide (TiO₂).

Taxonomic diversity and paleoenvironment

The studied GPR small mammal assemblages comprised 28 taxa, including five marsupials, nine bats, and 14 rodents (Table 5, Figure 4). Due to several reasons, including the fragmentary nature of the analyzed material or lack of representation of diagnostic characters, several taxa were determined only to generic level (e.g. Anoura sp., Histiotus sp., Delomys sp., Juliomys sp.).

Table 5.

Taxonomic composition of the small mammal assemblages studied from Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

Taxa	GPR 1			GPR 2			GPR 3			Recent^a
Taxa	NISP	NISP%	MNI	NISP	NISP%	MNI	NISP	NISP%	MNI	NISP	NISP%	MNI
Didelphimorphia	1^b	-	-	0^b	-	-	1^b	-	-	-	-	-
Didelphini	0	0.00	0	2	2.86	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Didelphis sp.	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	0.13	1
Philander quica	0	0.00	0	2	2.86	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Gracilinanus microtarsus	1	6.67	1	8	11.43	5	2	4.17	1	1	0.13	1
Monodelphis scalops	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	2.08	1	0	0.00	0
Marmosa paraguayana	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	3	6.25	2	0	0.00	0
Chiroptera	0^b	-	-	2^b	-	-	6^b	-	-	-	-	-
Phyllostomidae
Anoura sp.	0	0.00	0	1	1.43	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Chrotopterus auritus	0	0.00	0	1	1.43	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Artibeus cinereus	1	6.67	1	2	2.86	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Molossidae
Molossus molossus	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	0.13	1
Nyctinomops laticaudatus	0	0.00	0	4	5.71	2	3	6.25	1	2	0.25	1
Vespertilionidae	0	0.00	0	5	7.14	3	1	2.08	1	0	0.00	0
Eptesicus furinalis	0	0.00	0	1	1.43	1	2	4.17	1	0	0.00	0
Histiotus sp.	0	0.00	0	1	1.43	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Lasiurus sp.	0	0.00	0	1	1.43	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Myotis sp.	1	6.67	1	3	4.29	1	1	2.08	1	0	0.00	0
Rodentia	68^b	-	-	210^b	-	-	59^b	-	-	-	-	-
Cricetidae
Sigmodontinae	5	33.33	3	8	11.43	5	8	16.67	4	0	0.00	0
Delomys sp.	0	0.00	0	3	4.29	1	2	4.17	1	3	0.38	2
Juliomys sp.	3	20.00	2	12	17.14	4	10	20.83	5	32	4.06	14
Akodon sp.	1	6.67	1	6	8.57	2	5	10.42	2	0	0.00	0
Akodon montensis	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	83	10.53	29
Oxymycterus nasutus	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	2.08	1	0	0.00	0
Oxymycterus quaestor	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	3	0.38	2
Thaptomys nigrita	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	2	0.25	1
Euryoryzomys russatus	2	13.33	1	4	5.71	2	1	2.08	1	0	0.00	0
Nectomys squamipes	1	6.67	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Oligoryzomys sp.	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	5	10.42	4	528	67.01	162
Sooretamys angouya	0	0.00	0	3	4.29	1	2	4.17	1	3	0.38	2
Muridae
Mus musculus	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	2.08	1	110	13.96	36
Rattus sp.	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	18	2.28	8
Echimyidae
Phyllomys sp.	0	0.00	0	3	4.29	1	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0
Euryzygomatomys spinosus	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	0	0.00	0	1	0.13	1
Total	84	100	11	282	100	35	114	100	28	788	100	261

NISP: number of identified specimens; NISP%: number of identified specimens (maxillaries, dentaries, and isolated molars) expressed as percentage; MNI: minimum number of individuals.

Recent unit represents the data from owl pellets.

Isolated incisors and postcranial elements, possibly corresponding to the identified species, not considered in the calculation of the NISP% and MNI.

Figure 4.

Specimens from Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil). (a) Philander quica (GPR 2), left maxilla com M1. (b) Gracilinanus microtarsus (GPR 2), right dentary with m1–m4. (c) Marmosa paraguayana (GPR 3), left dentary with m3–m4. (d) Myotis sp. (GPR 2), right maxilla with P3–M3. (e) Nyctinomops laticaudatus (GPR 2), left dentary with p2–m3. (f) Akodon sp. (GPR 3), right maxilla with M1–M3. (g) Delomys sp. (GPR 2), right dentary with m1. (h) Euryoryzomys russatus (GPR 2), right maxilla with M1–M3. (i) Juliomys sp. (GPR 3), left dentary with m1–m3. (j) Oligoryzomys sp. (GPR 3), left dentary with m1–m3. (k) Oxymycterus nasutus (GPR 3), right dentary with m1–m3. (l) Sooretamys angouya (GPR 3), right maxilla with M1–M2. (m) Mus musculus (GPR 3), right dentary with m1. (n) Phyllomys sp. (GPR 2), right maxilla with P4. Scales bars (a–e, g, h, k, l, and n) = 1mm; (f, i, j, and m) = 500 µm.

Rodents are the most frequent taxon in the studied samples, surpassing 90% of NISP in the recent assemblage. Marsupials and chiropterans are more abundant in GPR 2 (representing 17% and 27%, respectively) than in the other units. Marsupials are equally diverse in GPR 3 and GPR 2, while Chiroptera is more diverse in GPR 2. Gracilinanus microtarsus, Akodon, and Juliomys sp. are the only taxa recorded in all units, including the recent sample. Echimyidae is recorded in GPR 2 (Phyllomys sp.) and in the recent assemblage (Euryzygomatomys spinosus) by one individual in each (Table 5). Five genera (Didelphis, Molossus, Thaptomys, Rattus, and Euryzygomatomys) are recorded only in the recent assemblage.

Only seven taxa are registered in GPR 1. It is characterized by a high frequency of forest taxa, such as Juliomys sp. (20% of NISP) and Euryoryzomys russatus (13.3% of NISP). GPR 2 encompasses 18 taxa, and the most frequent are Gracilinanus microtarsus (11.4%) and Juliomys sp. (17.1%). GPR 3 encompasses 15 taxa, and Juliomys sp. (20.8% of NISP) is the most frequent taxon, followed by Oligoryzomys sp. and Akodon sp. (10.4% each). Only one specimen of Mus musculus (2.08%), an exotic species, was recorded in GPR 3. In the recent assemblage, 14 taxa are recorded with Oligoryzomys sp. the most frequent (67.0%), followed by Mus musculus (13.96%) and Akodon montensis (10.5%) (Table 5).

The occurrence of species associated with forest environments, such as Gracilinanus microtarsus, Monodelphis scalops, Marmosa paraguayana, Philander quica, Delomys sp., Juliomys sp., Sooretamys angouya, Euryoryzomys russatus, and Phyllomys sp., is observed thorough the GPR sequence (Table 5). Two sigmodontine rodents that became dominant in human-modified ecosystems, Akodon sp. and Oligoryzomys sp., showed a dramatic increase in very recent times (Figure 5b). Although the studied samples are small, in particular GPR 1, forest dwellers are consistently present (Figure 5a); on the contrary, micromammals indicating grasslands or open environments, such as Thylamys, Bibimys, Calomys, Necromys, etc., lack a record.

Figure 5.

Temporal changes in the relative abundance (NISP%) based on a total NISP = 892 of four forest dwellers rodents (a) and two generalist rodents (b) from Gruta do Presépio (Santa Catarina, Brazil).

Discussion

Taphonomy

The absence of cut-marks and burnt remains suggests non-human accumulation for the analyzed samples in GPR (Fernández et al., 2017a, and references therein). Conversely, the practice of human consumption of small mammals has been recorded in Holocene archeological sites from Rio Grande do Sul State in the extreme south of Brazil (Fernández et al., 2019).

The finding of mostly light digestive corrosion on a low percentage of teeth and postcranial bones is in agreement with an accumulation produced by the nocturnal birds of prey – Strigiformes (e.g. Andrews, 1990; Fernández et al., 2017b; Montalvo and Fernández, 2019). Among the various species of owls that inhabit the study area, the barn owl, Tyto furcata, is the raptor that produces lower levels of digestion and preys on a variety of vertebrates similar to that recorded in GPR (e.g. Cherem et al., 2018; Stutz et al., 2020b). However, the fact that some strongly digested remains have been found in GPR 2 and GPR 3 could also indicate the participation of a different type of predator. Much greater modifications on bones and teeth are exerted by diurnal birds of prey – Accipitriformes – and carnivorous mammals (Montalvo and Fernández, 2019, and references therein). In fact, New World vultures have been documented as accumulators of medium and large mammal remains retrieved from GPR (Ballejo et al., 2022). It is largely known that archeological records are palimpsests on which different taphonomic agents intervene (e.g. Bailey, 2007; Ballejo et al., 2022; Guillermo et al., 2021; Lucas, 2005).

The studied remains from GPR are characterized by the absence of weathering and wind and/or hydraulic transport, suggesting a rapid introduction into the sedimentary deposit. Herbaceous cover, mainly during the deposition of the Mid–Late-Holocene sediments, is suggested by the greater root etching on bones registered in GPR 2 (Andrews, 1990). However, the broken elements with sharp angles and rough edges suggest a trampling action instead of digestion (smooth edges and obtuse fracture angles), a common taphonomic process in caves because they are restricted circulation spaces (Andrews, 1990; Pardiñas, 1999b).

Regarding diagenesis, the cementation of gypsum, a common mineral in extensive evaporitic sedimentary rock beds rarely found in the form of sand, recorded on bones and teeth in GPR, indicates oxidizing conditions. Fluorapatite is a common phosphate mineral that occurs widely as an accessory mineral in calcium-rich igneous or metamorphic rocks (Mange and Maurer, 1992). It can also occur as a detrital or diagenetic mineral, or as a residual product in lateritic soils (Weissbrod and Nachmias, 1986). Illite is a group of non-expandable clay minerals produced from the alteration of muscovite or feldspars in arid or hydrothermal environments. Feldspars are igneous rock-forming minerals that contain cations such as Na²⁺, Ca²⁺, and K⁺, and are very common as detrital or diagenetic phases in deposits or sedimentary rocks (Tucker, 2001).

Community change during the Holocene

All the species recorded in GPR occur, or potentially occur (Cherem et al., 2004), at present in the studied area. GPR 1, GPR 2, and GPR 3 are predominantly composed of forest taxa, such as Gracilinanus microtarsus, Monodelphis scalops, Marmosa paraguayana, Philander quica, Delomys sp., Juliomys sp., Sooretamys angouya, Euryoryzomys russatus, and Phyllomys sp. (Gardner, 2008; Patton et al., 2015; Pavan and Voss, 2016). The frequency of Gracilinanus microtarsus and the diversity of bats in GPR 2 are remarkable. Currently, for southern Brazil there are no cases like this in recent pellet samples (e.g. Cherem et al., 2018; da Silveira et al., 2021; Stutz et al., 2020b). The predominance of Akodon and Oligoryzomys in the contemporary community is clear, plus the exotic murid Mus musculus. These latter taxa first appear in GPR 3, at very low frequencies, especially Mus. Thus, we can observe a change in taxonomic composition from the Early Holocene toward recent Historic time and the present assemblage. The latter is very similar taxonomically to other assemblages produced by barn owls in Santa Catarina State (e.g. Cherem et al., 2018; da Silveira et al., 2021), with Oligoryzomys and Mus being the most frequent mammals preyed upon. This reveals a homogenization of micromammal assemblages, characterized regionally by the dominance of a few opportunistic taxa, a general impoverishment, and the extirpation of specialist species. It is largely known that such kinds of features typify worldwide human-influenced communities characterizing the Anthropocene (e.g. Fusco et al., 2016; Geri et al., 2010; Pardiñas, 1999c; Pardiñas et al., 2000, 2012; Rowe and Terry, 2014; Teta et al., 2014).

For the Holocene of Brazil there are few studied small mammal communities with precise chronological control (Hadler et al., 2013). Against this backdrop, three well-known assemblages from the northwestern Rio Grande do Sul State (i.e. the Garivaldino, Sangão, and Pilger archeological sites) are important. These deposits cover the Holocene from 9430 years BP to 3000 years BP, overlapping with almost the entire sequence of GPR (Fernández et al., 2019; Hadler et al., 2013). A rich pool of species is verified from these deposits, including those from open areas (e.g. Dicolpomys fossor, Proclinodontomys mordax, Ctenomys, Cavia, Calomys), with others common in forests (e.g. Delomys, Sooretamys, Phyllomys; Hadler et al., 2008, 2009, 2013, 2016; Stutz et al., 2017, 2020a). This taxonomic composition and the differential chronological distribution of the taxa recorded suggest an important environmental heterogeneity characterizing the entire Holocene (Hadler et al., 2013). The extinctions in the Rio Grande do Sul assemblages are noteworthy and include regional extirpations (e.g. Kunsia tomentosus and Gyldenstolpia) and biological losses (e.g. Dicolpomys fossor, Proclinodontomys mordax and Clyomys riograndensis; Fernández et al., 2019; Hadler et al., 2016; Stutz et al., 2017, 2020a). On the contrary, the assemblage and environmental evolution reflected by the assemblages recorded in GPR suggest community stability through time. For example, there is no evidence of extinctions or pseudoextinctions at this site. Although the potential taphonomic biases must be considered in interpreting these results (several of the extinguished forms in Rio Grande do Sul are clearly associated with human exploitation; Fernández et al., 2019), the GPR samples point to environmental continuity during the Holocene.

Paleoenvironments in southern Brazil: Combining evidence

Palynological data from Santa Catarina State are concentrated in coastal plains (e.g. Behling and Negrelle, 2001; Cancelli et al., 2012a, 2012b; Kuhn et al., 2023; Val-Peón et al., 2019). For the highlands, there are studies from Northern Santa Catarina State Plateau (Oliveira et al., 2006), Serra Geral (Behling, 1995) and Serra do Tabuleiro State Park (de Oliveira et al., 2012; Jeske-Pieruschka et al., 2013), all of the sites having altitudes over 850 m. Jeske-Pieruschka et al. (2013) pointed out that the dense ombrophilous forest moved from the lowlands over the slopes in the Early Holocene due to warmer and wetter conditions. Herbaceous plants decreased from the Mid–Late-Holocene onward, and arboreal taxa increased due to the wetter conditions, showing the expansion of the forest (de Oliveira et al., 2012). This wetter condition in the Late-Holocene was corroborated by trace-element analysis of a speleothem from Botuverá cave, which showed that the total amount of rainfall was higher when compared to the Early and Mid-Holocene (Bernal et al., 2016). Despite that, grassland was present during the Late-Holocene, indicating a mosaic environment. The dense ombrophilous forest reached its maximum expansion after 1500 cal. years BP. The Araucaria Forest began to develop more recently after 2000 years BP and expanded twice during the Late-Holocene (Jeske-Pieruschka et al., 2013). Thus, the dense ombrophilous forest expanded three times in Santa Catarina State (in the Early Holocene, during the Mid/Late-Holocene, and in the Late-Holocene). It differs from the highlands of Rio Grande do Sul, where the initial development started in the Mid-Holocene, indicating that the dense ombrophilous forest expanded from the north to more southerly regions (Jeske-Pieruschka et al., 2013).

In southern Brazil, the expansion of Araucaria Forest seems to be related to indigenous southern Jê populations (e.g. Bitencourt and Krauspenhar, 2006; Reis et al., 2014; Robinson et al., 2018). On one hand, the general wetter conditions favored the expansion of forests in the Late-Holocene on the south-facing slopes in a mosaic with grasslands (Jeske-Pieruschka et al., 2013). On the other hand, human activities were important in expanding forests beyond their natural habitat distribution boundaries (north-facing slopes) (Robinson et al., 2018). Unfortunately, the role of human populations in the dense ombrophilous forest expansion, if any, is not yet understood.

The palynological data are, overall, in accordance with data furnished by the small mammal assemblages recorded in Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina. In the Garivaldino, Pilger, and Sangão sites, grassland taxa are common throughout the entire sequences, and the forest taxa begin to appear from about 6000 years BP (Fernández et al., 2019; Hadler et al., 2013, 2016; Stutz et al., 2017, 2020a). In GPR, forest small mammal taxa were present in the last 8400 years BP and they dominate the samples until recently. Medium to large-sized mammals recorded in GPR also corroborate this finding, since the tapirid Tapirus terrestris, the mustelid Eira barbara, and the procyonid Nasua nasua occur predominantly in forests, occasionally feeding in or crossing open environments, including agricultural fields and grasslands (Ballejo et al., 2022).

Holocene climate variations, although with lower amplitudes of temperature than during glacial times, were larger and more frequent than is commonly recognized (Mayewski et al., 2004; Urrego et al., 2009; Wanner et al., 2015). The Holocene can roughly be subdivided into four periods: a progressively warming Early Holocene (between about 11.7 and 7–8 ka BP), above all in the Northern Hemisphere; a warm Mid-Holocene (between 7–8 and 4–5 ka BP); a cooler Late-Holocene (between 4 and 5 ka BP and the 19th century AD); and the modern, warm Industrial Era since about AD 1860 (Wanner et al., 2015). For eastern South America the records summarized by Gorenstein et al. (2022) suggest an overall drier Mid-Holocene climate compared to the Late-Holocene. Our data suggest that Holocene climate changes had different effects on the environments of the Atlantic Forest biome. While in Rio Grande do Sul, the meridional limit of the biome, the forests expanded later, in Santa Catarina expansion started earlier, maintaining an environmental stability over the Holocene.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 – Supplemental material for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio by Patrícia Hadler, Fernando J Fernández, Jorge José Cherem, Juliana Machado, Lucas Bueno, Thiago Umberto Pereira, Marivaldo Nascimento and Ulyses Francisco José Pardiñas in The Holocene

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-2-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 – Supplemental material for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio by Patrícia Hadler, Fernando J Fernández, Jorge José Cherem, Juliana Machado, Lucas Bueno, Thiago Umberto Pereira, Marivaldo Nascimento and Ulyses Francisco José Pardiñas in The Holocene

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

To P. C. Simões Lopes and M. E. Graipel for access to the material of the Coleção de Mamíferos of the Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia of the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. To the Laboratório Central de Microscopia Eletrônica of the UFSC for the SEM photographs. To the anonymous reviewers and Francis Mayle for their contributions to improving the manuscript. To Katarzyna Piper for English revision.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Fundação de Cultura Catarinense – Edital Elisabete Anderle 2017; CNPq – Edital Universal 28/2018 (grant number 40953/2018-7); and Escala Docente Program from Asociación de Universidades Grupo Montevideo.

ORCID iDs

Patricia Hadler

Fernando J Fernández

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Andrews

(1990) Owls, Caves and Fossils: Predation, Preservation and Accumulation of Small Mammal Bones in Caves, With an Analysis of the Pleistocene Cave Faunas From Westbury-Sub-Mendip, Somerset, UK. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Avery

(1982) Micromammals as palaeoenvironmental indicators and an interpretation of the Late Quaternary in the southern Cape province, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 85(2): 183–374.

Bailey

(2007) Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology 26: 198–223.

Ballejo

Hadler

Cherem

, et al. (2022) The first fossil record of a bone assemblage accumulated by new world vultures (Gruta do Presépio, Holocene, southern Brazil). Boreas 51: 684–697.

Barquez

Mares

Braun

(1999) The Bats of Argentina. Lubbock, TX: Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University, pp.1–275.

Behling

(1995) Investigations into the Late Pleistocene and Holocene history of vegetation and climate in Santa Catarina (S Brazil). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 4(3): 127–152.

Behling

Negrelle

RRB

(2001) Tropical rain forest and climate dynamics of the Atlantic lowland, Southern Brazil, during the Late Quaternary. The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu) 56(3): 383–389.

Bernal

Cruz

Stríkis

, et al. (2016) High-resolution Holocene South American monsoon history recorded by a speleothem from Botuverá Cave, Brazil. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 450: 186–196.

Bitencourt

ALV

Krauspenhar

(2006) Possible prehistoric anthropogenic effect on Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Kuntze expansion during the Late Holocene. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 9: 109–116.

10.

Boroni

Perini

Boggiani

, et al. (2021) Quaternary sigmodontines (Mammalia, Rodentia) from Serra da Bodoquena, mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Historical Biology 33(9): 1598–1623.

11.

Cancelli

Souza

PAD

Neves

PCPD

(2012a) Fungos, criptógamas e outros palinomorfos holocênicos (7908±30 anos AP-atual) da Planície Costeira sul-catarinense, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 20–37.

12.

Cancelli

Souza

PAD

Neves

PCPD

(2012b) Grãos de pólen de angiospermas do Holoceno (7908±30 anos AP-atual) da Planície Costeira sul-catarinense, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 26: 866–885.

13.

Cherem

Hadler

Stutz

, et al. (2018) Pequenos mamíferos (Didelphimorphia, Chiroptera e Rodentia) em egagropilos de Tyto furcata (coruja-das-igrejas) (Aves, Tytonidae) do sul do Brasil. Biotemas 31(3): 43–58.

14.

Cherem

Simões-Lopes

Althoff

, et al. (2004) Lista dos mamíferos do estado de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Mastozoología Neotropical 11(2): 151–184.

15.

da Silveira

Cherem

Hadler

(2021) Pequenos mamíferos em egagropilos de Tyto furcata em uma área de floresta Ombrófila Mista no sul do Brasil. Mastozoología Neotropical 28(1): 1–11.

16.

de Oliveira

MAT

Porsani

de Lima

, et al. (2012) Upper Pleistocene to Holocene peatland evolution in Southern Brazilian highlands as depicted by radar stratigraphy, sedimentology and palynology. The Quaternary Research 77(3): 397–407.

17.

de Oliviera

Ribeiro

Kerber

, et al. (2013) Late Quaternary caviomorph rodents (Rodentia: Hystricognathi) from Ceará State, Northern Brazil. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 75(1): 81–91.

18.

Dias

(2012) Hunter-gatherer occupation of South Brazilian Atlantic Forest: Paleoenvironment and archaeology. Quaternary International 256: 12–18.

19.

Dodson

Wexlar

(1979) Taphonomic investigations of owl pellets. Paleobiology 5: 275–284.

20.

Emmons

Vucetich

(1998) The identity of Winge’s Lasiuromys villosus and the description of a new genus of echimyid rodent (Rodentia, Echimyidae). American Museum Novitates 3223: 1–12.

21.

Fernández

Teta

Pardiñas

UFJ

(2017b) Evidencias arqueológicas de explotación antrópica de micromamíferos en el extremo austral de América del Sur. Anales de Arqueología y Etnología 72: 9–32.

22.

Fernández

Montalvo

Fernández-Jalvo

, et al. (2017a) A re-evaluation of the taphonomic methodology for the study of small mammal fossil assemblages of South America. Quaternary Science Reviews 155: 37–49.

23.

Fernández

Hadler

Cherem

, et al. (2019) Holocene small mammals hunted by owls and humans in southern Brazil: Taphonomic evidence and biological significance. Boreas 48(4): 953–965.

24.

Fordham

Jackson

Brown

, et al. (2020) Using paleo-archives to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. Science 369(6507): eabc5654.

25.

Fusco

McDowell

Prideaux

(2016) Late-Holocene mammal fauna from southern Australia reveals rapid species declines post-European settlement: Implications for conservation biology. The Holocene 26(5): 699–708.

26.

Galindo-Leal

Camara

IDG

(2003) The Atlantic Forest of South America. Biodiversity Status, Threats, and Outlook. Washington, DC: Island Press.

27.

Gardner

(ed.). (2008) Mammals of South America. In: Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats, vol. 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Geri

Amici

Rocchini

(2010) Human activity impact on the heterogeneity of a Mediterranean landscape. Applied Geography 30(3): 370–379.

29.

Gorenstein

Prado

Bianchini

, et al. (2022) A fully calibrated and updated Mid-Holocene climate reconstruction for Eastern South America. Quaternary Science Reviews 292: 107646.

30.

Grayson

(1984) Quantitative Zooarchaeology: Topics in the Analysis of Archaeological Faunas. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

31.

Guillermo

Montalvo

Fernández

(2021) Palimpsest of micromammal deposits in an archaeological rock shelter (Álvarez 4, Late Holocene) from northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 13(10): 1–18.

32.

Hadler

Cherem

Turbay

, et al. (2016) Diversidade de pequenos mamíferos (Didelphimorphia e Rodentia) do Holoceno do nordeste do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: Implicações taxonômicas e paleoambientais. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 19(1): 126–144.

33.

Hadler

Dias

Bauermann

(2013) Multidisciplinary studies of southern Brazil Holocene: Archaeological, palynological and paleontological data. Quaternary International 305: 119–126.

34.

Hadler

Ferigolo

Ribeiro

(2010) Chiroptera (Mammalia) from the Holocene of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Acta Chiropterologica 12(1): 19–27.

35.

Hadler

Goin

Ferigolo

, et al. (2009) Environmental change and marsupial assemblages in Holocene successions of Southern Brazil. Mammalian Biology 74(2): 87–99.

36.

Hadler

Mayer

Motta

, et al. (2018) Fossil bats from the Quaternary of Serra da Capivara, northeast Brazil. Quaternary International 464: 411–416.

37.

Hadler

Verzi

Vucetich

, et al. (2008) Caviomorphs (Mammalia, Rodentia) from the Holocene of Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil: systematics and paleoenvironmental context. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 11(2): 97–116.

38.

Hadly

(1996) Influence of Late-Holocene climate on Northern Rocky Mountain mammals. The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu) 46: 298–310.

39.

IBGE (2002) Mapa de clima do Brasil. Available at: https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/climatologia/mapas/brasil/Map_BR_clima_2002.pdf (accessed 27 October 2021).

40.

IBGE (2019) Mapa de biomas e sistema costeiro-marinho do Brasil. Available at: https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/estudos_ambientais/biomas/mapas/biomas_e_sistema_costeiro_marinho_250mil.pdf (accessed 27 October 2021).

41.

Jeske-Pieruschka

Pillar

De Oliveira

MAT

, et al. (2013) New insights into vegetation, climate and fire history of southern Brazil revealed by a 40,000 year environmental record from the State Park Serra do Tabuleiro. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 22(4): 299–314.

42.

Klein

(1978) Mapa Fitogeográfico Do Estado de Santa Catarina. Itajaí: Herbário “Barbosa Rodrigues.

43.

Kuhn

Zonneveld

KAF

Souza

, et al. (2023) Late Quaternary palaeoenvironmental evolution and sea level oscillation of Santa Catarina Island (southern Brazil). Biogeosciences 20: 1843–1861.

44.

Lucas

(2005) The Archaeology of Time. London: Routledge.

45.

Lund

(1846) Meddelelse af det Udbytte de i 1844 undersögte Knoglehuler have afgivet til Kundskaben om Brasiliens Dyreverden för sidste jordomvæltning. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Naturvidenskabelige og Matematiske Afhandlinger 12: 1–94.

46.

Lyman

(2018) Observations on the history of zooarchaeological quantitative units: Why NISP, then MNI, then NISP again? Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 18: 43–50.

47.

Machado

Bueno

Peroni

, et al. (2019) Territorialidades Ameríndias no Alto Vale do Itajaí. Um olhar a partir da Arqueologia, da Ecologia e da Paleontologia. Research Report, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Brazil.

48.

Mange

Maurer

HFW

(1992) Heavy Minerals in Colour. Oxford: Springer.

49.

Marques

MCM

Trindade

Bohn

, et al. (2021) The Atlantic Forest: An introduction to the megadiverse forest of South America. In: Marques

MCM

Grelle

CEV

(eds) The Atlantic Forest. Cham: Springer, pp.3–24.

50.

Mayewski

Rohling

Curt Stager

, et al. (2004) Holocene climate variability. The Quaternary Research 62(3): 243–255.

51.

Medellin

(1989) Chrotopterus auritus. Mammalian Species 343(343): 1–5.

52.

Montalvo

Fernández

(2019) Review of the actualistic taphonomy of small mammals ingested by South American predators: Its importance in the interpretation of the fossil record. Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina 19(1): 18–46.

53.

Motta

Hadler

Cherem

, et al. (2019) A marsupial assemblage (Mammalia, Didelphimorphia) from the Quaternary of the Serra da Capivara, state of Piauí, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 22(3): 225–239.

54.

Myers

Mittermeier

, et al. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

55.

Neves

SBD

Mayer

Hadler

, et al. (2017) Sigmodontine rodents (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from Quaternary cave deposits of Serra da Capivara, northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 20: 163–178.

56.

Neves

SBD

Pardiñas

UFJ

Hadler

, et al. (2020) A new fossil cricetid (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from northeastern Brazil with remarks on small mammal extinctions in the tropical quaternary. Journal of Mammalogy 101(4): 1133–1147.

57.

Noelli

Souza

JGD

(2017) Novas perspectivas para a cartografia arqueológica Jê no Brasil meridional. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas 12: 57–84.

58.

Oliveira

MATD

Pessenda

LCR

Behling

, et al. (2006) Registro de mudanças ambientais pleistocênicas e holocênicas em depósitos de cabeceira de vale: Campo Alegre, Planalto Norte catarinense (SC). Brazilian Journal of Geology 36(3): 474–487.

59.

Pardiñas

UFJ

(1999a) Los roedores muroideos del Pleistoceno tardío-Holoceno en la región pampeana (sector este) y Patagonia (República Argentina): aspectos taxonómicos, importancia bioestratigráfica y significación paleoambiental. PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

60.

Pardiñas

UFJ

(1999b) Tafonomía de microvertebrados en yacimientos arqueológicos de Patagonia. Arqueología 9: 265e340.

61.

Pardiñas

UFJ

(1999c) Fossil murids: Taxonomy, paleoecology, and paleoenvironments. Quaternary of South America and Antarctic Peninsula 12: 225–254.

62.

Pardiñas

UFJ

Borrero

Martin

, et al. (2022) Fossil rodents in Mylodon cave as indicators of Late Pleistocene–Holocene environmental evolution in southern Chile. The Quaternary Research 105: 218–234.

63.

Pardiñas

UFJ

Moreira

Garcia-esponda

, et al. (2000) Deterioro ambiental y micromamíferos durante el Holoceno en el nordeste de la estepa patagónica (Argentina). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 73: 541–556.

64.

Pardiñas

UFJ

Udrizar Sauthier

Teta

(2012) Micromammal diversity loss in central-eastern Patagonia over the last 400 years. Journal of Arid Environments 85: 71–75.

65.

Patton

Pardinãs

UFJ

D’Elía

(eds). (2015) Mammals of South America. Rodents, vol. 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

66.

Pavan

Voss

(2016) A revised subgeneric classification of short-tailed opossums (Didelphidae: Monodelphis). American Museum Novitates 3868: 1–44.

67.

Pereira

(2021) Análise tecnológica de coleções líticas no Alto Vale do Itajaí, Santa Catarina. Masters Dissertation, Universidade Federal de, Pelotas, Brazil.

68.

Pires

Avilla

Weksler

(2018) Fossil cricetid rodents from the Quaternary of Northern Brazil and their paleoenvironmental significance. Ameghiniana 55(2): 162–178.

69.

Reis

Almeida

Bueno

(2018) Entre estruturas e pontas: o contexto arqueológico do Alto vale do Itajai do Sul e o povoamento do Brasil meridional. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências Humanas 13: 597–623.

70.

Reis

MSD

Ladio

Peroni

(2014) Landscapes with Araucaria in South America: Evidence for a cultural dimension. Ecology and Society 19(2): 43.

71.

Robinson

De Souza

Maezumi

, et al. (2018) Uncoupling human and climate drivers of Late Holocene vegetation change in southern Brazil. Scientific Reports 8(1): 7800.

72.

Rowe

Terry

(2014) Small mammal responses to environmental change: integrating past and present dynamics. Journal of Mammalogy 95(6): 1157–1174.

73.

Stahl

(1996) The recovery and interpretation of microvertebrate bone assemblages from archaeological contexts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3(1): 31–75.

74.

Stutz

Hadler

Cherem

, et al. (2020a) Noteworthy sigmodontine (Rodentia: Cricetidae) diversity in southern Brazil as an indication of environmental change during the Holocene. Historical Biology 32(5): 649–670.

75.

Stutz

Hadler

Cherem

, et al. (2020b) Erratum: Small mammal diversity in semi-deciduous seasonal forest of the southernmost Brazilian Pampa: The importance of owl pellets for rapid inventories in human-changing ecosystems. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 60: e20206038.

76.

Stutz

Cherem

Pardiñas

UFJ

, et al. (2017) Roedores sigmodontíneos (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) Holocênicos do Rio Grande do Sul, brasil – o Sítio RS-TQ-58: Afonso Garivaldino Rodrigues. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 20(1): 133–148.

77.

Teta

Formoso

Tammone

, et al. (2014) Micromamíferos, cambio climático e impacto antrópico: ¿Cuánto han cambiado las comunidades del sur de América del Sur en los últimos 500 años? Therya 5: 7–38.

78.

Thackeray

(1987) Late Quaternary environmental changes inferred from small mammalian fauna, Southern Africa. Climatic Change 10: 285–305.

79.

Tucker

(2001) Sedimentary Petrology: An Introduction to the Origin of Sedimentary Rocks, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.

80.

Urrego

Bush

Silman

, et al. (2009) Millennial-scale ecological changes in tropical south America since the last glacial maximum. In: Vimeux

Sylvestre

Khodri

(eds) Past Climate Variability in South America and Surrounding Regions: From the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.283–300.

81.

Val-Peón

Cancelli

Santos

, et al. (2019) Prehistoric occupation and palaeoenvironmental changes along Santa Catarina's Coastal Plain, Brazil: An integrated approach based on palynological data. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 23: 983–992.

82.

Vibrans

Sevegnani

Gasper

, et al. (2012) Inventário Florístico Florestal de Santa Catarina. Diversidade e Conservação dos Remanescentes Florestais, vol. I. Blumenau: Edifurb.

83.

Voss

Jansa

(2009) Phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials, an extant radiation of New World metatherian mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 322: 1–177.

84.

Wanner

Mercolli

Grosjean

, et al. (2015) Holocene climate variability and change; a data-based review. Journal of the Geological Society 172(2): 254–263.

85.

Weissbrod

Nachmias

(1986) Stratigraphic significance of heavy minerals in the late Precambrian-Mesozoic clastic sequence ('Nubian Sandstone') in the near East. Sedimentary Geology 47: 263–291.

86.

Wilson

Mayle

Walters

, et al. (2021) Floristic change in Brazil’s southern Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot: From the Last glacial Maximum to the late 21st Century. Quaternary Science Reviews 264: 107005.

87.

Wood

Barnosky

(1994) Middle Pleistocene climate change in the Colorado Rocky Mountains indicated by fossil mammals from Porcupine Cave. Quaternary Research 41: 366–375.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina,southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Archeological context

Material and methods

Results

Taphonomy

Taxonomic diversity and paleoenvironment

Discussion

Taphonomy

Community change during the Holocene

Paleoenvironments in southern Brazil: Combining evidence

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 – Supplemental material for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-2-hol-10.1177_09596836231200440 – Supplemental material for Forest stability during the Holocene in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil revealed by small mammals from Gruta do Presépio

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Funding

ORCID iDs

Supplemental material

References

Supplementary Material