Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021
Rapoport’s Rule and the effect of the last glaciation upon elevational range size: An analysis using a dung beetle model (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Onthophagus ) in Mexican tropical mountains
Several studies have tested the Elevational Rapoport Rule (ERR) in arthropods, especially in the Neotropical mountains. Nonetheless, different approaches should be used for a more nuanced comprehension of ERR patterns and assemblage altitudinal distribution patterns, such as the biogeographical, ecological, and evolutionary contexts. This study aims to test the ERR for elevational gradients in Mexican mountains. For this study, dung beetle assemblages of the genus Onthophagus were used as a model organism, and their distribution was studied in several different mountain ranges of the Mexican tropics. Altitudinal distribution of Onthophagus species was analyzed, including ecological traits and biogeographical/phylogenetical contexts as covariables. The increase of altitude was positively correlated to the assemblage altitudinal range. Furthermore, altitudinal range, relative abundance, body size, and mountain’s topographic prominence were positively correlated to the mean altitudinal range of Onthophagus species. Nonetheless, different altitudinal relationships were observed, depending on the mountain. The results support the idea that species that inhabit higher altitudes appear to be more environmentally plastic and occur in wider altitudinal ranges than species from lower altitudes, thus supporting the ERR. The present findings stress that biogeographical, ecological, phylogenetical, and historical aspects, besides body size, are essential drivers of the altitudinal distribution of Onthophagus dung beetles.
AcostaRPratN (2010) Chironomid assemblages in high altitude streams of the Andean region of Peru. Fundamental and Applied Limnology: Official Journal of the International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology177: 57–79.
2.
Almeida-NetoMMachadoGPinto-da-RochaR, et al. (2006) Harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) species distribution along three Neotropical elevational gradients: An alternative rescue effect to explain Rapoport’s rule?Journal of Biogeography33: 361–375.
3.
Arriaga-JiménezAMoctezumaVRossiniM, et al. (2016) A new species of Onthophagus (Scarabaeoidea: Scarabaeinae) from the Mexican Transition Zone, with remarks on its relationships and distribution. Zootaxa4072: 135–143.
4.
Arriaga-JiménezARösMHalffterG (2018) High variability of dung beetle diversity patterns at four mountains of the Trans-Mexican volcanic belt. PeerJ6: e4468.
5.
AvolioMLForrestelEJChangCC, et al. (2019) Demystifying dominant species. New Phytologist223: 1106–1126.
6.
BreeschotenTDoorenweerdCTarasovS, et al. (2016) Phylogenetics and biogeography of the dung beetle genus Onthophagus inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution105: 86–95.
7.
BrehmGColwellRKKlugeJ (2007) The role of environment and mid-domain effect on moth species richness along a tropical elevational gradient. Global Ecology and Biogeography16(2): 205–219.
8.
BrownJH (1995) Macroecology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, p.270.
9.
BrownMDinsmoreJJ (1988) Habitat islands and the equilibrium theory of island biogeography: Testing some predictions. Oecologia75: 426–429.
10.
BrysonRWJrRiddleBR (2012) Tracing the origins of widespread highland species: A case of neogene diversification across the Mexican sierras in an endemic lizard. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society105: 382–394.
11.
BrysonRWJrGarcía-VázquezUORiddleBR (2012) Diversification in the Mexican horned lizard Phrynosoma orbiculare across a dynamic landscape. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution62: 87–96.
12.
CaballeroMLozano-GarcíaSVázquez-SelemL, et al. (2010) Evidencias de cambio climático y ambiental en registros glaciales y en cuencas lacustres del centro de México durante el último máximo glacial. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana62(3): 359–377.
13.
ColwellRKBrehmGCardelúsCL, et al. (2008) Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science322: 258–261.
14.
ColwellRKRangelTF (2010) A stochastic, evolutionary model for range shifts and richness on tropical elevational gradients under quaternary glacial cycles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences365: 3695–3707.
15.
da SilvaPGNunesCAFerreiraLF, et al. (2019) Patch and landscape effects on forest-dependent dung beetles are masked by matrix-tolerant dung beetles in a mountaintop rainforest archipelago. The Science of the Total Environment651: 1321–1331.
16.
DarwinCR (1845) Journal of researches into the natural history and geology of the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle round the world, under the Command of Capt. Fitz Roy, R.N., 2nd edn. London: John Murray.
17.
EdwardsCWBradleyRD (2002) Molecular systematics and historical phylobiogeography of the Neotoma Mexicana species group. Journal of Mammalogy83: 20–30.
18.
EmlenDJ (1997) Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology41: 335–341.
19.
EnquistMLeimarO (1987) Evolution of fighting behaviour: The effect of variation in resource value. Journal of Theoretical Biology127: 187–205.
20.
Escobar-HernándezFArenas-ParralAArriaga-JiménezA (2019) New distribution records and ecological notes for seven species of Onthophagus Latreille (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Oaxaca, Mexico, with description of the female of Onthophagus howdeni Zunino and Halffter and redescription of Onthophagus zapotecus Zunino and Halffter. The Coleopterists Bulletin73: 535–550.
21.
FengJHuXWangJ, et al. (2016) Support for the elevational Rapoport’s rule among seed plants in Nepal depends on biogeographical affinities and boundary effects. Ecology and Evolution6: 7246–7252.
22.
FreemanBGScholerMNRuiz-GutierrezV, et al. (2018) Climate change causes upslope shifts and mountaintop extirpations in a tropical bird community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115: 11982–11987.
23.
GastonKJChownSL (1999) Elevation and climatic tolerance. A test using dung beetles. Oikos86: 584–590.
24.
GilbertFS (1980) The equilibrium theory of island biogeography: Fact or fiction?Journal of Biogeography7: 209–235.
25.
Giménez GómezVCVerdúJRZuritaGA (2020) Thermal niche helps to explain the ability of dung beetles to exploit disturbed habitats. Scientific Reports10: 13364.
26.
GotelliNJEllisonM (2013) Framing and testing hypotheses. In: GotelliNJEllisonM (eds) A Primer of Ecological Statistics, 2nd edn.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp.79–105.
27.
HalffterGMorroneJJ (2017) An analytical review of Halffter’s Mexican transition zone and its relevance for evolutionary biogeography, ecology, and biogeographical regionalization. Zootaxa4226: 1–46.
28.
HalffterGZuninoMMoctezumaV, et al. (2019) The integration processes of the distributional patterns in the Mexican transition zone: Phyletic, paleogeographic and ecological factors of a case study. Zootaxa4586(1): 034.
29.
HeineK (1980) Quartäre Pluvialzeiten und klimamorphologischer Formenwandel in den Randtropen (Mexiko, Kalahari). In: JentschCLiedtkeH (eds) Höhengrenzen in Hochgebirgen, vol. 29. Arbeiten aus dem geographischen Instituts der Universität des Saarlandes, Universität des Saarlandes’, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp.135–155.
30.
HeineK (1988) Late quaternary glacial chronology of the Mexican volcanoes. Die Geowissenschaften7: 197–205.
31.
HeineK (1994) Present and past geocryogenic processes in Mexico. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes5: 1–12.
32.
HerzogSKHamel-LeigueACLarsenTH, et al. (2013) Elevational distribution and conservation biogeography of phanaeine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in Bolivia. PLoS One8(5): e64963.
33.
HortalJDiniz-FilhoJABiniLM, et al. (2011) Ice age climate, evolutionary constraints, and diversity patterns of European dung beetles. Ecology Letters14: 741–748.
34.
HowdenHFGillBD (1993) Mesoamerican Onthophagus latreille in the dicranius and mirabilis species groups (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Canadian Entomologist125: 1091–1114.
35.
KohlmannB (2021) Escarabajos estercoleros. Estudio de la Biodiversidad de Oaxaca. Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca y Comisión Nacional de la Biodiversidad (CoNaBio)III(7): 52–65.
36.
KnowlesLL (2000) Tests of Pleistocene speciation in mountain grasshoppers (genus Melanoplus) from the sky islands of western North America. Evolution54: 1337–1348.
37.
KohlmannBArriaga-JiménezARösM (2018) Dung beetle vicariant speciation in the mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico, with a description of a new species of Phanaeus (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae, Scarabaeidae). ZooKeys743: 67–93.
38.
KomposchCGruberJ (1999) Vertical distribution of harvestmen in the eastern Alps (Arachnida: Opiliones). Bulletin (British Arachnological Society)11: 131–135.
39.
KubotaULoyolaRDAlmeidaAM, et al. (2007) Body size and host range co-determine the altitudinal distribution of Neotropical tephritid flies. Global Ecology and Biogeography16: 632–639.
40.
LomolinoMV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: Historical and prospective views. Global Ecology and Biogeography10: 3–13.
41.
LomolinoMVRiddleBRWhittakerRJ (2017) Biogeography, 5th edn.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.
42.
MacArthurRHWilsonEO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
MarkBGHarrisonSPSpessaA, et al. (2005) Tropical snowline changes at the last glacial maximum: A global assessment. Quaternary International138–139: 168–201.
44.
Mastretta-YanesAXueATMoreno-LetelierA, et al. (2018) Long-term in situ persistence of biodiversity in tropical sky islands revealed by landscape genomics. Molecular Ecology27: 432–448.
45.
McCainCMBracy KnightK (2013) Elevational rapoport’s rule is not pervasive on mountains. Global Ecology and Biogeography22: 750–759.
46.
MittermeierRAGilPRHoffmanM, et al. (2005) Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Washington, DC: Conservation International.
47.
MoctezumaVRossiniMZuninoM, et al. (2016) A contribution to the knowledge of the mountain entomofauna of Mexico with a description of two new species of Onthophagus latreille, 1802 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). ZooKeys572: 23–50.
48.
Morueta-HolmeNEngemannKSandoval-AcuñaP, et al. (2015) Strong upslope shifts in Chimborazo’s vegetation over two centuries since Humboldt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112: 12741–12745.
49.
MumladzeLAsanidzeZWaltherF, et al. (2017) Beyond elevation: Testing the climatic variability hypothesis vs. Rapoport’s rule in vascular plant and snail species in the Caucasus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society121: 753–763.
50.
MurrayDLBastille-RousseauGBeatyLE, et al. (2020) From research hypothesis to model selection: A strategy for robust inference in population ecology. In: MurrayDSandercockBK (eds) Population Ecology in Practice. Pondicherry, India: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.17–46.
51.
MyersNMittermeierRAMittermeierCG, et al. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature403: 853–858.
52.
NicholsESpectorSLouzadaJ, et al. (2007) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation141: 1461–1474.
53.
Nogués-BravoDAraújoMBRomdalT, et al. (2008) Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species richness gradients. Nature453: 216–219.
54.
Pinilla-BuitragoGEEscalanteTGutiérrez-VelázquezA, et al. (2018) Areas of endemism persist through time: A palaeoclimatic analysis in the Mexican transition zone. Journal of Biogeography45: 952–961.
55.
PintorAFVSchwarzkopfLKrockenbergerAK (2015) Rapoport’s rule: Do climatic variability gradients shape range extent?Ecological Monographs85: 643–659.
56.
RapoportEH (1975) Areografía: Estrategias Geográficas de las Especies. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
57.
RapoportEH (1982) Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
58.
R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org (accessed 10 October 2020)
59.
RibasCRSchoerederJH (2006) Is the Rapoport effect widespread? Null models revisited. Global Ecology and Biogeography15: 614–624.
60.
RossiniMVaz-de-MelloFZZuninoM (2018) A taxonomic revision of the new world Onthophagus Latreille (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of the osculatii species-complex, with a description of two new species from South America. Journal of Natural History52(9–10): 541–586.
61.
SadakaNPongeJF (2003) Soil animal communities in holm oak forests: Influence of horizon, altitude, and year. European Journal of Soil Biology39: 197–207.
62.
SalomãoRPArriaga-JiménezAKohlmannB (2021) The relationship between altitudinal gradients, diversity, and body size in a dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Onthophagus) model system. Canadian Journal of Zoology99: 33–43.
63.
SchoolmeestersP (2016) Scarabs: World Scarabaeidae Database (version Jan 2016). In: RoskovYAbucayLOrrellT, et al. (eds) Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2016 Annual Checklist. Available at: www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2016 (accessed 11 November 2021).
64.
SouzaTBFrançaFMBarlowJ, et al. (2020) The relative influence of different landscape attributes on dung beetle communities in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Ecological Indicators117: 106534.
65.
SteinmannVWArredondo-AmezcuaLHernández-CárdenasRA, et al. (2021) Diversity and origin of the Central Mexican alpine flora. Diversity13: 31.
66.
StevensGC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist133: 240–256.
67.
StevensGC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: An extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. The American Naturalist140: 893–911.
68.
StevensGC (1996) Extending Rapoport’s rule to Pacific marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography23: 149–154.
69.
SvenningJCSkovF (2007) Ice age legacies in the geographical distribution of tree species richness in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography16: 234–245.
70.
Vázquez-SelemL (2011) Las glaciaciones en las montañas del centro de México. In: CaballeroMOrtega GuerreroB. (eds) Escenarios de cambio climático: Registros del Cuaternario de América Latina I. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp.218–238.
71.
Vázquez-SelemL (2020) Glaciaciones en montañas de México, climas del pasado y cambio climático actual. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slza3BX3boU (accessed 23 February 2020).
72.
Vázquez-SelemLHeineK (2011) Late Quaternary Glaciation in Mexico. In: EhlersJGibbardPLHughesPD (eds) Quaternary Glaciations – Extent and Chronology. Developments in Quaternary Science, vol. 15. Elsevier, pp.849–861.
73.
Vázquez-SelemLLachnietMS (2017) The deglaciation of the mountains of Mexico and Central America. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica/Geographical Research Letters43: 553–570.
74.
VerdúJRAlba-TercedorJJiménez-ManriqueM (2012) Evidence of different thermoregulatory mechanisms between two sympatric Scarabaeus species using infrared thermography and microcomputer tomography. PLoS One7: e33914.
75.
VeterNMDeSantisLRGYannLT, et al. (2013) Is Rapoport’s rule a recent phenomenon? A deep time perspective on potential causal mechanisms. Biology Letters9: 1–5.
ZuurAFIenoENElphickCS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution1: 3–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
