Chronological studies applying Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating (SHD) were performed on six glacier forelands in the western part of the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Although lithological heterogeneity prevented a regional age-calibration curve to be established, local age-calibration curves for La Perouse Glacier and Strauchon Glacier could be derived. They show similar linear equations and trends/slopes and enabled a preliminary assessment of the representativeness of individual 10Be terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating (TCND)-ages obtained from the other forelands. No mid- and early-Holocene advance periods were detected. Clusters of moraine ages date around 2800, 1850–1450, and 1100–900 years ago, followed by the ‘Little Ice Age’ commencing c. 500 years ago. There is no good agreement with earlier radiocarbon-based studies and recently published TCND-chronologies. As it will be outlined, this partly could be the result of different approaches to the palaeoclimatic interpretation of the dated samples. The results obtained from this recent study do not support an elsewhere proposed general asynchronous glacier behaviour between the mid-latitudinal Northern and Southern hemispheres.
AaARSjåstadJA (2000) Schmidt hammer age evaluation of the moraine sequence in front of Bøyabreen, western Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift80: 27–32.
2.
AaARSjåstadJSønstegaardE. (2007) Chronology of Holocene rock-avalanche deposits based on Schmidt-hammer relative dating and dust stratigraphy in nearby bog deposits, Vora, inner Nordfjord, Norway. The Holocene17: 955–964.
3.
AdnanA (2009) ISRM suggested method for determination of the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness revised version. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences46: 627–634.
4.
AkcarNIvy-OchsSKubikPW. (2011) Post-depositional impacts on ‘Findlinge’ (erratic boulders) and their implications for surface-exposure dating. Swiss Journal of Geosciences104: 445–453.
5.
AndersonBMackintoshA (2006) Temperature change is the major driver of late-glacial and Holocene glacier fluctuations in New Zealand. Geology34: 121–124.
6.
AndersonBMackintoshA (2012) Controls on mass balance sensitivity of maritime glaciers in the Southern Alps, New Zealand: The role of debris cover. Journal of Geophysical Research117: F01003.
7.
AndersonBLawsonWOwensI (2008) Response of Franz Josef Glacier Ka Roimata o Hine Hukatere to climate change. Global and Planetary Change63: 23–30.
8.
ApplegatePJUrbanNMKellerK. (2010) Modeling the statistical distributions of cosmogenic exposure dates from moraines. Geoscientific Model Development3: 293–307.
9.
ApplegatePJUrbanNMKellerK. (2012) Improved moraine age interpretations through explicit matching of geomorphologic process models to cosmogenic nuclide measurements from single landforms. Quaternary Research77: 293–304.
10.
AugustinusPC (1992) The influence of rock mass strength on glacial valley cross-profile morphometry: A case study from the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms17: 39–51.
11.
AydinABasuA (2005) The Schmidt hammer in rock characterization. Engineering Geology81: 1–14.
12.
BakkeJLieØDahlSO. (2008) Strength and spatial patterns of the Holocene wintertime westerlies in the NE Atlantic region. Global and Planetary Change60: 28–41.
13.
BalcoGStoneJOLiftonNA. (2008) A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements. Quaternary Geochronology3: 174–195.
14.
BarrellDJAAndersenBGDentonGH (2011) Glacial Geomorphology of the Central South Island (GNS Science Monographs 27). Lower Hutt: GMS Science, 81 pp.
15.
BennDIEvansDJA (2010) Glaciers and Glaciation. 2nd Edition.London: Hodder, 802 pp.
16.
BettsMWLattaMA (2000) Rock surface hardness as an indicator of exposure age an archaeological application of the Schmidt hammer. Archaeometry42: 209–223.
17.
BöhlertREgliMMaischM. (2011) Application of a combination of dating techniques to reconstruct the Lateglacial and early Holocene landscape history of the Albula region (eastern Switzerland). Geomorphology127: 1–13.
18.
BrookMSLukasS (2012) A revised approach to discriminating sediment transport histories in glacigenic sediments in a temperate alpine environment: A case study from Fox Glacier, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms37: 895–900.
19.
BurrowsCJ (1973) Studies on some glacial moraines in New Zealand – 2. Ages of moraines of the Mueller, Hooker and Tasman Glaciers. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics16: 831–855.
20.
BurrowsCJ (1980) Radiocarbon dates for post-Otiran glacial activity in the Mount Cook region, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics23: 239–248.
21.
BurrowsCJ (1989) Aranuian radiocarbon dates from moraines in the Mount Cook region, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics32: 205–216.
22.
BurrowsCJGellatlyAF (1982) Holocene glacier activity in New Zealand. Striae18: 41–47.
23.
BurrowsCJBellDGrantH (2002) Two new radiocarbon ages for mid- and late-Aranuian age valley-train deposits of the Franz Josef Glacier, Westland, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand32: 415–425.
24.
ChildDElliottGMifsudC. (2000) Sample processing for earth science studies at ANTARES. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms172: 856–860.
25.
ChinnTFitzharrisBBWillsmanA. (2012) Annual ice volume changes 1976–2008 for the New Zealand Southern Alps. Global and Planetary Change92–93: 105–118.
26.
ChinnTJH (1996) New Zealand glacier responses to climate change of the past century. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics39: 415–428.
27.
ChinnTJH (2001) Distribution of the glacial water resources of New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand)40: 139–187.
28.
ChinnTJHWhitehouseIE (1980) Glacier snow line variations in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the Riederalp Workshop, September1978, pp. 219–228, IAHS Publication No. 126. Oxfordshire: IASH.
29.
ChinnTJHSalingerJFitzharrisBB. (2008) Glaciers and climate. Bulletin of the Federal Mountain Clubs of New Zealand, vol. 171, pp. 1–15.
30.
ChinnTJHWinklerSSalingerMJ. (2005) Recent glacier advances in Norway and New Zealand – A comparison for their glaciological and meteorological causes. Geografiska Annaler – Series A: Physical Geography87: 141–157.
31.
ChristarasB (1996) Non destructive methods for investigation of some mechanical properties of natural stones in the protection of monuments. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology54: 59–63.
32.
CockburnHAPSummerfieldMA (2004) Geomorphological applications of cosmogenic isotope analysis. Progress in Physical Geography28: 1–42.
33.
CoxSCBarrellDJA (2007) Geology of the Aoraki Area – Geological Map 1:250 000 (Qmap series 15). Lower Hutt: GNS Science, 71 pp.
34.
DavisPTMenounosBOsbornG (2009) Holocene and latest Pleistocene alpine glacier fluctuations: A global perspective. Quaternary Science Reviews28: 2021–2033.
35.
DayMJGoudieAS (1977) Field assessment of rock hardness using the Schmidt test hammer. Technical Bulletin: British Geomorphological Research Group18: 19–29.
36.
DesiletsDZredaM (2003) Spatial and temporal distribution of secondary cosmic-ray nuclear intensities and applications to in situ cosmogenic dating. Earth and Planetary Science Letters206: 21–42.
37.
DesiletsDZredaMPrabuT (2006) Extended scaling factors for in situ cosmogenic nuclides: New measurements at low latitude. Earth and Planetary Science Letters246: 265–276.
38.
DunaiTJ (2000) Scaling factors for production rates of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides: A critical reevaluation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters176: 157–169.
39.
DunaiTJ (2001) Influence of secular variation of the geomagnetic field on production rates of in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides. Earth and Planetary Science Letters193: 197–212.
40.
DunaiTJ (2010) Cosmogenic Nuclides: Principles, Concepts and Applications in Earth Surface Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187 pp.
41.
EngelZ (2007) Measurement and age assignment of intact rock strength in the Krkonoše Mountains, Czech Republic. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie NF, Supplement 51: 69–80.
42.
EvansDJAArcherSWilsonDJH (1999) A comparison of the lichenometric and Schmidt hammer dating techniques based on data from the proglacial areas of some Icelandic glaciers. Quaternary Science Reviews18: 13–41.
43.
FabelDHarborJ (1999) The use of in-situ produced cosmogenic radionuclides in glaciology and glacial geomorphology. Annals of Glaciology28: 103–110.
44.
FitzharrisBBHayJEJonesPD (1992a) Behaviour of New Zealand glaciers and atmospheric circulation changes over the past 130 years. The Holocene2: 97–106.
45.
FitzharrisBBOwensIFChinnTJH (1992b) Snow, ice and glacier hydrology.In: MosleyMP (ed.) Waters of New Zealand. Wellington: The New Zealand Hydrological Society, pp. 75–93.
46.
GellatlyAF (1982) Lichenometry as a relative-age dating method in Mount Cook National Park, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany20: 343–353.
47.
GellatlyAF (1984) The use of rock weathering-rind thickness to redate moraines in Mount Cook National Park, New Zealand. Arctic and Alpine Research16: 225–232.
48.
GellatlyAF (1985a) Glacial fluctuations in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand: Documentation and implications for environmental change during the last 1000 years. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde und Glazialgeologie21: 259–264.
49.
GellatlyAF (1985b) Historical records of glacier fluctuations in Mt Cook National Park, New Zealand: A century of change. The Geographical Journal151: 86–99.
50.
GellatlyAFChinnTJHRöthlisbergerF (1988) Holocene glacier variations in New Zealand: A review. Quaternary Science Reviews7: 227–242.
51.
GosseJCPhillipsFM (2001) Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: Theory and application. Quaternary Science Reviews20: 1475–1560.
52.
GoudieAS (2006) The Schmidt hammer in geomorphological research. Progress in Physical Geography30: 703–718.
53.
GroveJM (2004) Little Ice Ages, vol. 2. London: Routledge, 718 pp.
54.
HauptF (2012) Anwendungsorientierte Bewertung zweier Methoden zur relativen Altersdatierung holozäner Moränen an Hochgebirgsgletschern. Unpublished Diploma Thesis, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, 126 pp.
55.
HeymanJStroevenAPHarborJM. (2011) Too young or too old: Evaluating cosmogenic exposure dating based on an analysis of compiled boulder exposure ages. Earth and Planetary Science Letters302: 71–80.
56.
HolzhauserHZumbühlHJ (1999) Nacheiszeitliche Gletscherschwankungen (Blatt 3.8, Hydrologischer Atlas der Schweiz). Bern: Bundesamt für Landestopographie (Map).
57.
HookerBLFitzharrisBB (1999) The correlation between climatic parameters and the retreat and advance of Franz Josef Glacier, New Zealand. Global and Planetary Change22: 39–48.
58.
HormesABeerJSchlüchterC (2006) A geochronological approach to understanding the role of solar activity on Holocene glacier length variability in the Swiss Alps. Geografiska Annaler – Series A: Physical Geography88: 281–294.
59.
HormesAMüllerBJSchlüchterC (2001) The Alps with little ice evidence for eight Holocene phases of reduced glacier extent in the Central Swiss Alps. The Holocene11: 255–265.
60.
IPCC (ed.) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the 4th Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.
61.
Ivy-OchsSKerschnerHMaischM. (2009) Latest Pleistocene and Holocene glacier variations in the European Alps. Quaternary Science Reviews28: 2137–2149.
62.
JoerinUEStockerTFSchlüchterC (2006) Multicentury glacier fluctuations in the Swiss Alps during the Holocene. The Holocene16: 697–704.
63.
JomelliVKhodriMFavierV. (2011) Irregular tropical glacier retreat over the Holocene epoch driven by progressive warming. Nature474: 196–199.
64.
KaplanMRSchaeferJMDentonGH. (2010) Glacier retreat in New Zealand during the Younger Dryas stadial. Nature467: 194–197.
65.
KirkbrideMP (2000) Ice marginal geomorphology and Holocene expansion of debris-covered Tasman Glacier, New Zealand. In: NakawoMRaymondCFFountainA (eds) Debris-Covered Glaciers (IAHS Publication No. 264). Paris: IAHS, pp. 211–217.
66.
KirkbrideMPWinklerS (2012) Correlation of late Quaternary moraines: Impact of climate variability, glacier response, and chronological resolution. Quaternary Science Reviews46: 1–29.
67.
LalD (1991) Cosmic ray labeling of erosion surfaces: In situ nuclide production rates and erosion models. Earth and Planetary Science Letters104: 424–439.
68.
LarsenSHDaviesTRHMcSaveneyMJ (2005) A possible coseismic landslide origin of late Holocene moraines of the Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics48: 311–314.
69.
LehmannG (2002) Statistik. Heidelberg: Spektrum, 385 pp.
70.
LiftonNABieberJWClemJA. (2005) Addressing solar modulation and long-term uncertainties in scaling secondary cosmic rays for in situ cosmogenic nuclide applications. Earth and Planetary Science Letters239: 140–161.
71.
McCarrollD (1987) The Schmidt hammer in geomorphology five sources of instrument error. Technical Bulletin: British Geomorphological Research Group36: 16–27.
72.
McCarrollD (1989a) Potential and limitations of the Schmidt hammer for relative-age dating field tests on Neoglacial moraines, Jotunheimen, southern Norway. Arctic and Alpine Research21: 268–275.
73.
McCarrollD (1989b) Schmidt hammer relative-age evaluation of a possible pre-‘Little Ice Age’ Neoglacial moraine, Leirbreen, southern Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift69: 125–130.
74.
McCarrollD (1991) The age and origin of Neoglacial moraines in Jotunheimen, southern Norway: New evidence from weathering-based data. Boreas20: 283–295.
75.
McCarrollD (1994) The Schmidt hammer as a measure of degree of rock surface weathering and terrain age. In: BeckC (ed.) Dating in Exposed and Surface Contexts. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 29–45.
McKinzeyKMLawsonWKellyD. (2004) A revised Little Ice Age chronology of the Franz Josef Glacier, Westland, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand34: 381–394.
78.
MatthewsJABriffaK (2005) The ‘Little Ice Age’: Re-evaluation of an evolving concept. Geografiska Annaler – Series A: Physical Geography87: 17–36.
79.
MatthewsJADresserP-Q (2008) Holocene glacier variation chronology of the Smørstabbtindan massif, Jotunheimen, southern Norway, and the recognition of century- to millennial-scale European Neoglacial events. The Holocene18: 181–201.
80.
MatthewsJAMcEwenLJ (2013) High-precision Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating of flood berms, Vetlestølsdalen, alpine southern Norway: First application and some methodological issues. Geografiska Annaler – Series A: Physical Geography95: 185–195.
81.
MatthewsJAOwenG (2010) Schmidt hammer exposure-age dating: Developing linear age-calibration curves using Holocene bedrock surfaces from the Jotunheimen–Jostedalsbreen region of southern Norway. Boreas39: 105–115.
82.
MatthewsJAShakesbyRA (1984) The status of the ‘Little Ice Age’ in southern Norway: Relative-age dating of Neoglacial moraines with Schmidt hammer and lichenometry. Boreas13: 333–346.
83.
MatthewsJAWinklerS (2011) Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating (SHD): Application to early Holocene moraines and a reappraisal of the reliability of terrestrial cosmogenic-nuclide dating (TCND) at Austanbotnbreen, Jotunheimen, Norway. Boreas40: 256–270.
84.
MenounosBOsbornGClagueJJ. (2009) Latest Pleistocene and Holocene glacier fluctuations in western Canada. Quaternary Science Reviews28: 2049–2074.
85.
MifsudCFujiokaTFinkD (2012) Extraction and purification of quartz in rocks using hot phosphoric acid for in situ cosmogenic exposure dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms294: 203–207.
86.
NesjeA (2009) Late Pleistocene and Holocene alpine glacier fluctuation in Scandinavia. Quaternary Science Reviews28: 2119–2136.
87.
NesjeABlikraLHAndaE (1994) Dating rockfall-avalanche deposits from the degree of rock-surface weathering by Schmidt hammer tests a study from Norangsdalen, Sunnmøre, Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift74: 108–113.
88.
NiedzielskiTMigonPPlacekA (2009) A minimum sample size required from Schmidt hammer measurements. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms34: 1713–1725.
89.
NussbaumerSUSteinhilberFTrachselM. (2011) Alpine climate during the Holocene: A comparison between records of glaciers, lake sediments and solar activity. Journal of Quaternary Science26: 703–713.
90.
OrombelliG (2011) Holocene mountain glacier fluctuations: A global review. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria34: 17–24.
91.
OwenGMatthewsJAAlbertPG (2007) Rates of Holocene chemical weathering, ‘Little Ice Age’ glacial erosion and implications for Schmidt-hammer dating at a glacier–foreland boundary, Fåbergstølsbreen, southern Norway. The Holocene17: 829–834.
92.
PorterSC (2000) Onset of Neoglaciation in the southern hemisphere. Journal of Quaternary Science15: 395–408.
93.
Proceq (2004) Operating Instructions (Betonprüfhammer N/NR–L/LR). Zürich: Proceq SA, 17 pp.
94.
PutnamAEDentonGHSchaeferJM. (2010a) Glacier advance in south middle-latitudes during the Antarctic Cold Reversal. Nature Geoscience3: 700–704.
95.
PutnamAESchaeferJMBarrellDJA. (2010b) In situ 10Be production-rate calibration from the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Quaternary Geochronology5: 392–409.
96.
PutnamAESchaeferJMDentonGH. (2012) Regional climate control of glaciers in New Zealand and Europe during the pre-industrial Holocene. Nature Geoscience5: 627–630.
97.
PutnamAESchaeferJMDentonGH. (2013) The last glacial maximum at 44°S documented by a 10Be moraine chronology at Lake Ohau, Southern Alps of New Zealand. Quaternary Science Reviews62: 114–141.
98.
ReutherAU (2007) Surface Exposure Dating of Glacial Deposits from the Last Glacial Cycle (Relief Boden Paläoklima 21). Berlin/Stuttgart: Bornträger, 213 pp.
99.
ReznichenkoNVDaviesTRAlexanderDJ (2011) Effects of rock avalanches on glacier behaviour and moraine formation. Geomorphology132: 327–338.
100.
ReznichenkoNVDaviesTRShulmeisterJP. (2012) Influence of rock avalanches upon the formation of moraines and their subsequent palaeoclimatic interpretation: A critical appraisal. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie NF, Supplement56(4): 37–54.
101.
RöthlisbergerF (1986) 10.000 Jahre Gletschergeschichte der Erde. Aargau: Sauerlander, 416 pp.
102.
RöthlisbergerFSchneebeliW (1979) Genesis of lateral moraine complexes, demonstrated by fossil soils and trunks indicators of postglacial climatic fluctuations. In: SchlüchterC (ed.) Moraines and Varves. Rotterdam: AugustAimé Balkema, pp. 387–419.
103.
SachsL (1999) Angewandte Statistik. 9th Edition.Berlin: Springer, 881 pp.
104.
SchaeferJMDentonGHKaplanM. (2009) High-frequency Holocene glacier fluctuations in New Zealand differ from the northern signature. Science324: 622–625.
105.
SchildgenTFPhillipsWMPurvesRS (2005) Simulation of snow shielding corrections for cosmogenic nuclide surface exposure dating. Geomorphology64: 67–85.
106.
SchönwieseC-D (1992) Praktische Statistik für Meteorologen und Geowissenschaftler. Berlin/Stuttgart: Bornträger, 231 pp.
107.
ShakesbyRAMatthewsJAOwenG (2006) The Schmidt hammer as a relative-age dating tool and its potential for calibrated-age dating in Holocene glaciated environments. Quaternary Science Reviews25: 2846–2867.
108.
ShakesbyRAMatthewsJASchnabelC (2008) Cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al ages of Holocene moraines in southern Norway II: Evidence for individualistic responses of high-altitude glaciers to millennial-scale climatic fluctuations. The Holocene18: 1165–1177.
109.
ShakesbyRAMatthewsJAKarlénW. (2011) The Schmidt hammer as a Holocene calibrated-age dating technique: Testing the form of the R-value-age relationship and defining the predicted-age errors. The Holocene21: 615–628.
110.
ShulmeisterJDaviesTREvansDJA. (2009) Catastrophic landslides, glacier behaviour and moraine formation – A view from an active plate margin. Quaternary Science Reviews28: 1085–1096.
111.
SolominaOHaeberliWKullC. (2008) Historical and Holocene glacier-climate variations general concept and overview. Global and Planetary Change60: 1–9.
112.
StahlTWinklerSQuigleyM. (2013) Schmidt hammer exposure-age dating (SHD) of late Quaternary fluvial terraces in New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. Epub ahead of print 5 May. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3427.
113.
StoneJO (2000) Air pressure and cosmogenic isotope production. Journal of Geophysical Research105(B10): 23753–23759.
114.
StroevenAPFabelDHarborJM. (2011) Importance of sampling across an assemblage of glacial landforms for interpreting cosmogenic ages of deglaciation. Quaternary Research76: 148–156.
115.
VaccoDAAlleyRBPollardD (2010) Glacier advance and stagnation caused by rock avalanches. Earth and Planetary Science Letters294: 123–130.
116.
VilesHGoudieAGrabS. (2011) The use of the Schmidt hammer and Equotip for rock hardness assessment in geomorphology and heritage science: A comparative analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms36: 320–333.
117.
WannerHBeerJBütikoferJ. (2008) Mid- to late Holocene climate change: An overview. Quaternary Science Reviews27: 1791–1828.
118.
WannerHSolominaOGrosjeanM. (2011) Structure and origin of Holocene cold events. Quaternary Science Reviews30: 3109–3123.
119.
WardleP (1973) Variations of the glaciers of Westland National Park and the Hooker Range, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany11: 349–388.
120.
WardleP (1978) Further radiocarbon dates from Westland National Park and the Omoeroa River mouth, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany16: 147–152.
121.
WatchmanALTwidaleCR (2002) Relative and ‘absolute’ dating of land surfaces. Earth-Science Reviews58: 1–49.
122.
WGMS (2008) Global Glacier Changes: Facts and Figures. Zürich: UNEP/World Glacier Monitoring Service, 88 pp.
123.
WinklerS (2000) The ‘Little Ice Age’ maximum in the Southern Alps, New Zealand – Preliminary results at Mueller Glacier. The Holocene10: 643–647.
124.
WinklerS (2004) Lichenometric dating of the ‘Little Ice Age’ maximum in Mt Cook National Park, Southern Alps, New Zealand. The Holocene14: 911–920.
125.
WinklerS (2005) The ‘Schmidt hammer’ as a relative-age dating technique potential and limitations of its application on Holocene moraines in Mt Cook National Park, Southern Alps, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics48: 105–116.
126.
WinklerS (2009a) First attempt to combine terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (10Be) and Schmidt hammer relative-age dating: Strauchon Glacier, Southern Alps, New Zealand. Central European Journal of Geosciences1: 274–290.
127.
WinklerS (2009b) Gletscher und ihre Landschaften. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft Darmstadt, 183 pp.
128.
WinklerS (2012) Addressing geomorphological uncertainties with terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating (TCND) – Examples from Holocene moraines in the Southern Alps of New Zealand. Geophysical Research Abstracts14: EGU2012-1331.
129.
WinklerSHagedornH (1999) Lateralmoränen – Morphologie, Genese und Beziehung zu Gletscherstandsschwankungen (Beispiele aus Ostalpen und West-/Zentralnorwegen). Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie NF, Supplement Band113: 69–84.
130.
WinklerSMatthewsJA (2010) Holocene glacier chronologies: Are ‘high-resolution’ global and inter-hemispheric chronologies possible?The Holocene20: 1137–1147.
131.
WinklerSShakesbyRA (1995) Anwendung von Lichenometrie und Schmidt-Hammer zur relativen Altersdatierung prä-frührezenter Moränen, am Beispiel der Vorfelder von Guslar-, Mitterkar-, Rofenkar- und Vernagtferner, Ötztaler Alpen, Österreich. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen139: 283–304.
132.
WinklerSChinnTGärtner-RoerI. (2010) An introduction to mountain glaciers as climate indicators with spatial and temporal diversity. Erdkunde64: 97–118.
133.
WooMFitzharrisBB (1992) Reconstruction of mass balance variations for Franz Josef Glacier, New Zealand, 1913 to 1989. Arctic and Alpine Research24: 281–290.
134.
ZempMHoelzleMHaeberliW (2009) Six decades of glacier mass-balance observations: A review of the worldwide monitoring network. Annals of Glaciology50: 101–111.
