Trade unions have changed from being male dominated to majority-female organizations. We use linked employer–employee surveys for Norway and Britain to examine whether, in keeping with a median voter model, the gender shift in union membership has resulted in differential wage returns to unionization among men and women. In Britain, while only women receive a union wage premium, only men benefit from the increased bargaining power of their union as indicated by workplace union density. In Norway, however, both men and women receive a union wage premium in male-dominated workplaces; but where the union is female dominated, women benefit more than men. The findings suggest British unions continue to adopt a paternalistic attitude to representing their membership, in contrast to their more progressive counterparts in Norway.
ArnholzJMeardiGOldervollJ (2018) Collective wage bargaining under strain in northern European construction: Resisting institutional drift?European Journal of Industrial Relations24(4): 341–356.
2.
ArtzBGoodallAHOswaldAJ (2016) Do women ask? IZA discussion paper no. 10183. Bonn. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp10183.pdf
3.
BalsvikRSæthreM (2014) Rent sharing with footloose production. NHH discussion paper SAM 30/14. Bertgen: Foreign Ownership and Wages Revisited. Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/222551
4.
BarthENaylorRRaaumO (2000) Union wage effects: Does membership matter?Manchester School68(3): 259–275.
5.
BeirneMWilsonF (2015) Running with ‘wolves’ or waiting for a happy release? Evaluating routes to gender equality. Work, Employment and Society30(2): 220–236.
6.
BlanchflowerDBrysonA (2003) Changes over time in union relative wage effects in the UK and the US Revisited. In: AddisonJTSchnabelC (eds) International Handbook of Trade Unions.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 197–245.
7.
BlanchflowerDGBrysonA (2007) What effect do unions have on wages now and would ‘what do unions do?’ Be surprised’. In: BennettJTKaufmanB F (eds) What Do Unions Do? A Twenty-year Perspective.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 79–113.
8.
BlanchflowerDGBrysonA (2010) The wage impact of trade unions in the UK public and private sectors. Economica77(305): 92–109.
9.
BoothAL (1994) The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BorghansLGolsteynBHHHeckmanJJ, et al (2009) Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. NBER working paper no. 14713. Washington. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w14713
11.
BowlesHRBabcockLMcGinnKL (2005) Constraints and triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in Negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 951–965.
12.
BrownWBrysonAForthJ (2009) Competition and the retreat from collective bargaining. In: BrownWBrysonAForthJWhitfieldK (eds) The Evolution of the Modern Workplace.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–47.
BuddJMumfordK (2004) Trade unions and family-friendly policies in Britain. Industrial and Labor Relations Review53(2): 204–222.
15.
CharlwoodAForthJ (2009) Employee representation. In: BrownWBrysonAForthJWhitfieldK (eds) The Evolution of the Modern Workplace.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–96.
16.
DølvikJEMarginsonPAlsosKArnholtzJMeardiGMüllerTTrygstadS (2018) Collective wage regulations in northern Europe under strain: Multiple drivers of change and differing responses. European Journal of Industrial Relations24(4): 321–339.
DexSForthJ (2009) Equality and diversity at work. In BrownWBrysonAForthJWhitfieldK (eds) The Evolution of the Modern Workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–255.
19.
DonadoAWaldeK (2012) How trade unions increase welfare. The Economic Journal122: 990–1009.
20.
DunlopJ (1944) Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
European Commission (2009) Gender Segregation in the Labour Market: Root Causes, Implications and Policy Responses in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
22.
FlandersA (1970) Management and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations. London: Faber.
23.
HarknessS (1996) The gender earnings gap: Evidence from the UK. Fiscal Studies17(2): 1–36.
24.
HealyGKirtonG (2000) Women, power and trade union government. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(3): 343–360.
25.
HealyGKirtonG (2013) The early mobilization of women union leaders – a comparative perspective. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(4): 709–732.
26.
HicksJ (1932) The Theory of Wages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
JensenRSSchøneP (2007) Kvinneledede bedrifter – Gjør det noen forskjell for bedrifters familievennlighet?Sosiologisk tidsskrift 3/2007.
28.
KirtonG (2006) Alternative or parallel careers for women: The case of trade union participation. Work, Employment and Society20(1): 47–66.
29.
KirtonG (2015) Progress towards gender democracy in UK unions 1987 – 2012. British Journal of Industrial Relations53(3): 484–507.
30.
MetcalfDHansenKCharlwoodA (2001) Unions and the sword of justice: Unions and pay systems, pay inequality, pay discrimination and low pay. National Institute Economic Review176: 61–75.
31.
MillwardNWoodlandS (1995) Gender segregation and male/female wage differences. Gender, Work & Organization2(3): 125–139.
32.
MüllerTDølvikJEIbsenCSchultenT (2018) The manufacturing sector: Still and anchor for pattern bargaining within and across countries?European Journal of Industrial Relations24(4): 357–374.
33.
NergaardK (2014) Trade Unions in Norway: Coordinated Wage Bargaining and Workplace Level Co-determination. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
RosenfeldJ (2014) What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
42.
SchnabelC (2013) Union membership and density: Some (not so) stylized facts and challenges. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(3): 255–272.
43.
SchnabelCWagnerJ (2007) Union density and determinants of union membership in 18 EU countries: Evidence from micro data, 2002/03. Industrial Relations Journal38(1): 5–32.
44.
SlichterSHealyJLivernashR (1960) The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington: Brookings Institution.
45.
StokkeTA (2008) The anatomy of two-tier bargaining models. European Journal of Industrial Relations14(1): 7–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
