We offer a defence of, and framework for, comparative research in industrial and employment relations, based on a long-term engagement with the social contexts under study. We locate ‘slow’ research strategies in relation to predominant approaches and establish a number of basic precepts of slow comparativism as a practical methodological approach. We aim to provoke a discussion among those conducting comparative research on work and employment about how truth claims are generated. We also seek a basis by which those conducting slower forms of comparativism, through what we term ‘implicit ethnographies’, can find better ways of developing and defending their modes of research within an often hostile academic political economy.
AlmondPGonzalezMC (2013) Cross-national comparative human resource management and the ideational sphere: A critical review. International Journal of Human Resource Management25(18): 2591–2607.
3.
AndersonB (2016) Frameworks of comparison. London Review of Books38(2): 15–18.
4.
BeckU (2007) Beyond class and nation: Reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world. British Journal of Sociology58(4): 679–705.
5.
BélangerJTrudeauG (2009) Institutional specificity of Quebec in the context of globalization. Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal15(1): 49–76.
6.
BergMSeeberBK (2016) The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
7.
BrennerNPeckJTheodoreN (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks10(2): 182–222.
8.
BrookPDarlingtonR (2013) Partisan, scholarly and active: Arguments for an organic public sociology of work. Work, Employment and Society27(3): 526–536.
9.
BrysonC (2004) What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal35(1): 38–57.
10.
BurawoyM (1998) The extended case method. Sociological Theory16(1): 4–33.
11.
BurawoyM (2009) The Extended Case Method. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
12.
ButlerNDelaneyHSliwaM (2017) The labour of academia. Ephemera17(3): 467–480.
13.
ColliniS (2012) What Are Universities For?London: Penguin Books.
14.
ConnollyH (2010) Renewal in the French Trade Union Movement: A Grassroots Perspective. Oxford: Peter Lang.
15.
ConnollyHMarinoSMartínez LucioM (2017) Justice for Janitors goes Dutch: The possibilities and limitations of organising in the Netherlands. Work, Employment and Society31(2): 319–335.
16.
DaltonKBinghamC (2016) A social institutionalist perspective on HR diffusion: Historical and cultural receptivity to HRM in a post-communist context. International Journal of Human Resource Management28(6): 825–851.
17.
DjelicMLQuackS (2003) Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
18.
DufourCHegeA (2002) L’Europe syndicale au quotidien. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.
19.
ErneR (2013) National unionism and union democracy in crisis. Labor History54(4): 471–476.
20.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2012) A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
FregeC (2005) Varieties of industrial relations research: Take-over, convergence or divergence?British Journal of Industrial Relations3(2): 179–207.
22.
GonzalezMAlmondPMurrayG (2018) Regional business systems and the governance of foreign direct investment in Canada, Spain and the UK. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas163: 3–20.
23.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2018 [2013]) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HallPGingerichD (2009) Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science39(3): 449–482.
25.
HallPSoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HantraisL (1999) Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology2(2): 93–108.
27.
HantraisLMangenS (1996) Method and management of cross-national social research. In: HantraisLMangenS (eds) Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences. London: Cassell, pp. 1–12.
28.
HicksonDJMcMillanCJAzamiKHorvathD (1979) Grounds for comparative organisation theory: Quicksands or hard core? In: LammersCHicksonD (eds) Organisations Alike and Unlike. London: Routledge, pp. 25–41.
29.
HuzzardTBjorkmanH (2012) Trade unions and action research. Work, Employment and Society26(1): 161–171.
30.
HymanR (2001) Trade union research and cross-national comparison. European Journal of Industrial Relations7(2): 203–232.
31.
HymanR (2004) Is industrial relations theory always ethnocentric? In: KaufmanB (ed.) Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship. Champaign: IRRA, pp. 265–292.
32.
JacksonGDeegR (2008) Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies39(4): 540–561.
33.
JacobyS (2005) Business and society in Japan and the United States. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(4): 617–634.
34.
JessopB (2013) Revisiting the regulation approach: Critical reflections on the contradictions, dilemmas, fixes and crisis dynamics of growth regimes. Capital & Class37(1): 5–24.
35.
KatzJ (2015) A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytical fieldwork. Méthod(e)s1(1): 131–146.
36.
KerrCHarbisonFDunlopJTMyersCA (1960) Industrialism and industrial man. International Labour Review82(3): 236–250.
37.
LockeRThelenK (1995) Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics & Society23(3): 337–367.
38.
LockeRM (1992) The demise of the national union in Italy: Lessons for comparative industrial relations theory. ILR Review45(2): 229–249.
39.
LoganJ (2002) Consultants, lawyers, and the ‘union free’ movement in the USA since the 1970s. Industrial Relations Journal33(3): 197–214.
40.
MarsdenD (1986) The End of Economic Man?London: Wheatsheaf.
41.
MarsdenD (1999) A Theory of Employment Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
MauriceM (1979) For a study of the societal effect: Universality and specificity in organisational research. In: LammersCHicksonD (eds) Organisations Alike and Unlike. London: Routledge, pp. 42–60.
43.
MauriceMSellierFSylvestreJ-J (1986) The Social Foundations of Industrial Power. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
44.
MeardiG (2000) Trade Union Activists, East and West: Comparisons in Multinational Companies. Aldershot: Gower.
45.
MeardiG (2003) From trade union models to trade union styles: Towards a revised taxonomy of European Labour Movements. In: Proceeding of the 6th ESA conference, Murcia, 26–28 September.
46.
MeardiG (2011) Understanding trade union cultures. Industrielle Beziehungen18(4): 336–345.
47.
MeardiG (2013) Trade unions in Western Europe: Hard times, hard choices. Labor History54(4): 466–470.
48.
MehanH (1979) Learning Lessons: Social Organisation in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
MurrayGDufourCHegeALévesqueC (2010) Referential unionisms and globalization: A comparative study of workplace. European Journal of Industrial Relations16(4): 311–332.
50.
PeckJ (2013) For Polanyian economic geographies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space45: 1545–1568.
51.
PeckJTheodoreN (2007) Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography31(6): 731–772.
52.
PudelkoM (2006) A comparison of HRM systems in the USA, Japan and Germany in their socio-economic context. Human Resource Management Journal16(2): 123–153.
53.
RutherfordTDMurrayGAlmondPPelardM (2017) State accumulation projects and inward investment regimes strategies. Regional Studies52(4): 572–584.
54.
StewartPMartínez LucioM (2017) Research participation and neoliberal context: The challenges of emergent participatory and emancipatory research approaches. Ephemera17(3): 533–556.
55.
WhitleyR (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
