In 1990 Swedish employers ended peak-level bargaining, while in 2007 the Finnish employers’ confederation withdrew from the tripartite bargaining system. This article compares the two events, examining the underlying dynamics of class struggle and in particular the shift in structural power resulting from the transnational organization of production. We argue that the far lower degree of transnationalization in Finland explains why the attack on the established class compromise happened much later than in Sweden and has been less successful.
AhlénK (1989) Swedish collective bargaining under pressure: Inter-union rivalry and income policies. British Journal of Industrial Relations27(3): 330–346.
2.
AhtiainenL (2011) Palkansaajain järjestäytyminen vuonna 2009 ja työehtosopimusten kattavuus vuonna 2008 Suomessa, Työpoliittinen Aikakauskirja 3/2011.
3.
ArterD (2007) The end of the social democratic hegemony? The March 2007 Finnish General Election. West European Politics30(5): 1148–1157.
4.
BergholmT (2009) The making of the Finnish model: The qualitative change in Finnish corporatism in the early 1960s. Scandinavian Journal of History34(1): 29–48.
5.
BergholmT (2011) Tulopolitiikan pitkät jäähyväiset. In: NiemeläMSaariJ (eds) Politiikan polut ja hyvinvointivaltion muutos. Helsinki: Kela.
6.
Bergholm (2012) Finnish Trade Unions 2012: Strong Trade Union Movement in Gradual Decline. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Reports.
7.
BielerA (2000) Globalisation and Enlargement of the European Union: Austrian and Swedish Social Forces in the Struggle over Membership. London: Routledge.
8.
BielerA (2005) The ‘demise’ of the Swedish model: Globalisation, neoliberalism and class struggle. In: MossB (ed.) Monetary Union in Crisis: The European Union as a Neoliberal Construction. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 266–280.
9.
BielerA (2006) The Struggle for a Social Europe: Trade Unions and EMU in Times of Global Restructuring. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
10.
BraunerhjelmPEkholmKGrundbergLKarpatyP (1996) Swedish multinational corporations: Recent trends in foreign activities. Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research Working Paper 462, Stockholm.
11.
BruffI (2008) Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
12.
BruffI (2011) What about the elephant in the room? Varieties of capitalism, varieties in capitalism. New Political Economy16(4): 481–500.
13.
CrouchC (1993) Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
HallPASoskiceD (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
JohanssonALMagnussonL (1998) LO andra halvseklet. Fackföreningsrörelsen och samhället. Uddevalla: Atlas.
KjellbergA (1998) Sweden: Restoring the model? In: FernerAHymanR (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–117.
21.
KjellbergA (2009) The Swedish Ghent system and trade unions under pressure. Transfer15(3–4): 481–504.
22.
KöykkäV (1994) Changing strategies in Nordic employers organizations. In: KauppinenTKöykkäV (eds) The Changing Structures and Strategies of the Employers’ and Employees’ Organizations. Helsinki: IIRA 4th European Regional Congress, Helsinki, pp. 75–96.
23.
LiljaK (1998) Finland: continuity and modest moves towards company-level corporatism. In: FernerAHymanR (eds) Changing Industrial Relations in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 171–189.
24.
LillieNSippolaM (2011) National unions and transnational workers: The case of Olkiluoto 3, Finland. Work, Employment and Society25(2): 292–308.
25.
LuifP (1996) On The Road To Brussels: The Political Dimension of Austria’s, Finland’s and Sweden’s Accession to the European Union. Vienna: Braumüller.
26.
MansnerM (2005) Suomalaista yhteiskuntaa rakentamassa. Suomen Työnantajain Keskusliitto 1980–1992. Helsinki: Elinkeinoelämän Keskusliitto (EK).
27.
MosesJW (1995) Devalued priorities: The politics of Nordic exchange rate regimes compared. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California Los Angeles.
28.
NycanderS (2002) Makten över arbetsmarknaden. Ett perspektiv på Sveriges 1900-tal. Kristiansand: SNS Förlag.
29.
OlsenG (1991) Labour mobilization and the strength of capital: The rise and stall of economic democracy in Sweden. Studies in Political Economy34: 109–145.
30.
OrnstonD (2006) Reorganising adjustment: Finland’s emergence as a high technology leader. West European Politics29(4): 784–801.
31.
PizzornoA (1978) Political exchange and collective identity in industrial conflict. In: CrouchCPizzornoA (eds) The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe since 1968: Volume 2 Comparative Analyses. London: Macmillan, pp. 277–298.
32.
RaunioT (2010) The EU and the welfare state are compatible: Finnish social democrats and European integration. Government and Opposition45(2): 187–207.
33.
ReiterJ (2003) Changing the microfoundations of corporatism: The impact of financial globalisation on Swedish corporate ownership. New Political Economy8(1): 103–125.
34.
SippolaM (2012) Local bargaining and codetermination: Finnish experience in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations18(1): 53–69.
35.
SissonK (1987) The Management of Collective Bargaining. An International Comparison. Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
StråthB (1998) Mellan två fonder. LO och den svenska modellen. Uddevalla: Atlas.
37.
SwensonP (2002) Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
TollidaySZeitlinJ (eds) (1991) The Power to Manage? Employers and Industrial Relations in Comparative-Historical Perspective. London: Routledge.
39.
UNCTAD (1996) World Investment Report: Investment, Trade and International Policy Arrangements. New York: United Nations.
40.
UNCTAD (2010) World Investment Report: Investing in a Low-Carbon Economy. New York: United Nations.
41.
WilksS (1996) Class compromise and the international economy: The rise and fall of Swedish social democracy. Capital & Class58: 89–111.
