Trade union responses to labour market activation policies are central to any assessment of their attitudes and strategies in the face of contemporary welfare state restructuring. Yet this issue has to date been the object of only limited theorization and minimal empirical investigation. We attempt to remedy this. Drawing on existing literatures in different disciplines, we first outline the theoretical grounds for predicting union opposition to or support for labour market activation measures. We then explore these competing arguments through a reconstruction and comparison of the development of union positions on labour market activation over time in two countries, France and the Netherlands. The case studies suggest that union stances on these policies are not straightforwardly determined by the structure of labour market institutions; considerations regarding the impact of activation initiatives on the role of unions in the institutions of the welfare state play a major role in mobilizing their consent or dissent.
AndersonKLynchJ (2007) Reconsidering seniority bias: Ageing, internal institutions and union support for pension reform. Comparative Politics39(2): 189–208.
2.
AndewegRIrwinG (2009) Governance and Politics of the Netherlands, 2nd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BaccaroLLimS (2007) Social pacts as coalitions of the weak and moderate: Ireland, Italy and South Korea in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations13(1): 27–46.
4.
BaccaroLSimoniM (2008) Policy concertation in Europe: Understanding government choice. Comparative Political Studies41(10): 1323–1348.
5.
BaccaroLHamannKTurnerL (2003) The politics of labour movement revitalization: The need for a revitalized perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 119–133.
6.
BodeI (1991) Les syndicats professionnels et le RMI. Revue Française des Affaires Sociales45(1): 127–140.
7.
BodeI (1997) Le difficile altruisme des groupes d’intérêt: le cas du syndicalisme CFDT et de la mutualité ouvrière. Revue Française de Sociologie38(2): 269–300.
8.
BonoliG (2010) The Political Economy of Active Labour Market Policy. RECWOWEWorking Paper 01/2010, Edinburgh.
9.
BruttelOSolE (2006) Work first as a European model? Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands. Policy & Politics34(1): 69–89.
10.
CFDT (2000) Assurance chômage: le programme CFDT. Syndicalisme Hebdo2788, 13April.
11.
ClasenJViebrockE (2008) Voluntary unemployment insurance and trade union membership: Investigating the connections in Denmark and Sweden. Journal of Social Policy37(3): 433–451.
12.
CleggD (2002) The political status of social assistance benefits in European welfare states: Lessons from reforms to provision for the unemployed in France and Great Britain. European Journal of Social Security4(3): 201–226.
13.
CleggD (2005) Activating the multi-tiered welfare state. PhD thesis, European University Institute.
14.
CleggD (2008) From liberal statism to statist liberalism: The transformation of unemployment policies in Europe. In: Seeleib-KaiserM (ed.) Welfare State Transformations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 147–163.
15.
CleggD (2011) France: Integration versus dualisation. In: ClasenJCleggD (eds) Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34–54.
16.
Conseil Economique et Social (CES) (1987) Grande pauvreté et précarité économique et sociale (rap. Wresinski), Journal Officiel, Avis et rapports du Conseil Economique et Social no. 1987/6, Direction des Journaux Officiels, Paris.
17.
Conseil Economique et Social (CES) (2001) Familles et insertion économique et sociale des adultes de 18 à 25 ans (rap. Brin), Journal Officiel, Avis et rapports du Conseil Economique et Social 2001/5, Direction des Journaux Officiels, Paris.
18.
Cour des Comptes (2006) L’évolution de l’assurance chômage: de l’indemnisation a l’aide au retour à l’emploi. Paris: La Documentation Française.
19.
CrouchC (1999) Employment, industrial relations and social policy: new life in an old connection. Social Policy & Administration33(4): 437–457.
20.
CrouchC (2000) The snakes and ladders of 21st century trade unionism. Oxford Review of Economic Policy16(1): 70–83.
21.
CulpepperP (2002) Powering, puzzling and pacting: The informational logic of negotiated reforms. Journal of European Public Policy9(5): 774–790.
22.
DamonJ (2004) Le RMA: Genèse, contenu et enjeux. Revue de Droit Sanitaire et Social 1/2004: 30–47.
23.
DanielC (1997) La naissance du régime conventionnel d’assurance chômage, ou les ambiguïtés du paritarisme à la française. La Revue de l’IRES24: 131–152.
24.
De KoningJ (2009) Reforms in Dutch active labour policy during the last 20 years: An evaluation. SEORWorking Paper No. 2009/2.
25.
EbbinghausB (2006) Trade union movements in post-industrial welfare states: Opening up to new social interests? In: ArmingeonKBonoliG (eds) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States. London: Routledge, 123–142.
26.
EbbinghausB (2010) Reforming Bismarckian corporatism: The changing role of social partnership in Continental Europe. In: PalierB (ed.) A Long Goodbye to Bismarck?Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 255–278.
27.
EichhorstWKaufmannOKohnle-SeidlR (eds) (2008) Bringing the Jobless Back Into Work. Berlin: Springer.
28.
EmmeneggerP (2009a) Regulatory Social Policy: The Politics of Job Security Regulations. Bern: Haupt.
29.
EmmeneggerP (2009b) Barriers to entry: Insider/outsider politics and the political determinants of job security regulations. Journal of European Social Policy19(2): 131–146.
HasselA (2009) Policies and politics of social pacts in Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations15(1): 7–26.
37.
HaüsermannS (2010) Solidarity with whom? Why trade unions are losing ground in continental pension politics. European Journal of Political Research49(2): 233–256.
38.
HemerijckA (2003) A paradoxical miracle: The politics of coalition government and social concertation in Dutch welfare reform. In: JochenSSiegelN (eds) Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik in Wohlfahrstaat. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 232–270.
39.
HymanR (2007) How can trade unions act strategically?Transfer13(2): 193–210.
40.
ICTWSS (2009) Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007 (version 2). Amsterdam: AIAS.
41.
LevyJ (1999) Tocqueville’s Revenge: State, Society and Economy in Contemporary France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
LindbeckASnowerD (2001) Insiders versus outsiders. Journal of Economic Perspectives15(1): 165–188.
43.
MabbettDFreierM (2011) The partisan politics of active labour market policies revisited. Unpublished article.
44.
MartinCJ (2005) Corporatism from the firm perspective: Employers and social policy in Denmark and Britain. British Journal of Political Science35(1): 127–148.
45.
MolinaORhodesM (2002) Corporatism: The past, present and future of a concept. Annual Review of Political Science5: 305–331.
46.
NelsonM (2009) An application of the estimated dependent variable approach: Trade union members’ support for active labour market policies and insider-outsider politics. International Journal of Public Opinion Research21(2): 224–234.
47.
PalierB (2010) The dualizations of the French welfare system. In: PalierB (ed.) A Long Goodbye to Bismarck?Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 73–100.
48.
ParsonsN (2002) France in the 1990s: Struggling with the weight of history. In: CompstonHBergerS (eds) Policy Concertation and Social Partnership in Western Europe. Oxford: Berghahn, 111–124.
49.
RousseauY (2008) Sur la fusion de l’ANPE et des Assedic. Droit Social no. 2/2008: 151–165.
50.
RuedaD (2006) Social democracy and active labour market policy: Insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion. British Journal of Political Science36(3): 385–406.
51.
RuedaD (2007) Social Democracy Inside-Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Saint-PaulG (1998) A framework for analysing the political support for active labour market policy. Journal of Public Economics67(2): 151–165.
53.
SchmitterPStreeckW (1999) The organisation of business interests. MPIfG Discussion Paper no. 99/1, Cologne.
54.
StreeckW (2005) The sociology of labor markets and trade unions. In: SmelserNSwedbergR (eds) Handbook of Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage, 254–283.
55.
ValkenburgB (2004) Trade unions and activation: Confronting the dilemma. Transfer10(4): 588–605.
56.
Van BerkelR (2010) The provision of income protection and activation services for the unemployed in ‘active’ welfare states. An international comparison. Journal of Social Policy39(1): 17–34.
57.
VisserJ (2006) Union membership statistic in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review129(1): 39–49.
58.
VisserJHemerijckA (1997) A Dutch Miracle. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
59.
WillmannC (2009) L’autonomie des partenaires sociaux en débat: Pôle emploi et la convention d’assurance chômage du 19 février 2009. Droit Social7–8/2009: 830–841.
60.
WRR (1990) Een werkend perspectief. WRR Rapport aan de Regering 38. The Hague: SDU.
