According to theorists of Varieties of Capitalism, employers can achieve strong decentralized cooperation on vocational training when there are institutional devices encouraging workers and firms to co-invest in the skill production. Yet numerous European countries, including those where such institutional devices exist, do not rely on ‘spontaneous’ co-investment but operate compulsory training funds and levies which establish obligatory mutualization between employers.The objective of this article is to show that the rationalist theoretical framework of Varieties of Capitalism theory is capable of accounting for such collective financial schemes in the apprenticeship field, but is less suited to capture the compulsory contributions for continuing vocational training.
Beicht U. and Walden G. ( 2004) KostenderAusbildung. In: Beicht U, Walden G and Hermann H (eds) Kosten und NutzenderbetrieblichenBerufsausbildung in Deutschland. Bonn: Bertelsmann Verlag.
2.
Bmbf (1992) Berufsbildungsbericht 1992. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
3.
Bmbf (2007) Berufsbildungsbericht 2007. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
4.
Cognard E. ( 2009) Large firms and employers’ associations: The intra-associative implications of compulsory contributions to vocational training. LEFI-ISH Working paper.
5.
Culpepper P. ( 1999) Individual choice, collective action, and the problem of training reform: Insight from France and Eastern Germany. In: Culpepper P and Finegold D (eds) The German Skills Machine. New York: Berghahn, 269-325.
6.
Culpepper P. ( 2003) Creating Cooperation: How States Develop Human Capital in Europe. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press.
7.
Drake K. ( 1991) Interventions in market financing of training in the European Community. In: Paul R (ed.) International Comparisons of Vocational Education and Training for Intermediate Skills. London: Falmer, 207-232.
8.
Estévez-Abe M., Iversen T. and Soskice D. ( 2001) Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state. In: Hall P and Soskice D (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 145-183.
9.
Finegold D. and Soskice D. ( 1988) The failure of training in Britain: Analysis and prescription . Oxford Review of Economic Policy4(3): 21-53.
10.
Gasskov V. ( 2002) Industry support for training: An international perspective . Paper to Conference, ‘VET: Connections, Costs & Contradictions’, Monash University, August.
11.
Grote J. and Lang A. ( 2005) The country studies: Germany. In: Traxler F (ed.) Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and Business Interest Organisations in the European Union. Brussels : European Commission, DG Employment, 100-130.
12.
Hall PA and Soskice D. ( 2001) An introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Hall P and Soskice D (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-68.
13.
Hansen ME ( 1998) The financing of vocational education and training in Denmark. CedefopPanorama series 90.
14.
Hummelsheim S. and Timmermann D. ( 2000) The Financing of Vocational Education and Training in Germany. Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP.
15.
Iversen T. and Soskice D.(2009) Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century . World Politics61(3): 438-486.
16.
Johansen L-H ( 2002) Transferable training as a collective good. European Sociological Review18(3): 301-314.
17.
Léné A. ( 2002) Formation, compétences et adaptabilité : l’alternance en débat. ParisL’Harmattan , Collection « Alternances Développement ».
18.
Marsden D. ( 1993) Le génie du système allemand et la réforme du système américain. Formation/ Emploi44: 53-54.
19.
Observatory of European SMEs (2000) Sixth Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications.
20.
Offt (2007) La formation professionnelle en Suisse en 2007. Faits et données chiffrées . Berne: OFFT.
21.
Ok W. and Tergeist P. ( 2003) Improving workers’ skills: Analytical evidence and the role of the social partners. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers10, OECD, Paris.
22.
Ostrom E. ( 1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Rueda D. and Pontusson J. ( 2000) Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics52(3): 350-383.
24.
Soskice D. ( 1994) Reconciling markets and institutions: The German apprenticeship system. In: Lynch LM (ed.) Training and the Private Sector: International Comparisons. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 25-60.
25.
Streeck W. ( 1983) Between pluralism and corporatism: German business associations and the state. Journal of Public Policy3(3): 265-283.
26.
Thelen K. ( 2002) The political economy of business and labor in the developed democracies. In: Katznelson I and Milner H (eds) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: Norton, 371-397.
27.
Thelen K. and van Wijnbergen C. ( 2003) The paradox of globalisation: Labor relations in Germany and beyond. Comparative Political Studies36(8): 859-880.
28.
Traxler F. ( 2005) Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and Business Interest Organisations in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, DG Employment.
29.
Tremblay D-G and Le Bot I. ( 2000) The German Dual Apprenticeship System: An Analysis of Its Evolution and Present Challenges. Toronto: York University, Labour Education and Training Research Network.
30.
Wagner K. ( 1999) The German apprenticeship system under strain. In: Culpepper P and Finegold D (eds) The German Skills Machine. New York: Berghahn, 37-76.
31.
Wallerstein M., Golden M. and Lange P. ( 1997) Unions, employers’ associations, and wage-setting institutions in Northern and Central Europe, 1950-1992. Industrial and Labor Relations Review50(3): 379-401.
32.
Waterreus JM ( 1997) O+O fondsenonderzocht. Opleidings- en ontwikkelingsfondsen en de scholing van werknemers. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
