The framework of the European social dialogue (ESD) has enabled interest
organizations at the European level to conclude agreements on a wide range of
social policy issues. This applies both at the inter-sectoral level and within
the various sectors, and has led in the last few decades to the creation of a
large number of joint texts. This article addresses the issue of the added value
of these results for the parties concluding them. It is argued that the ESD does
not constitute a system of industrial relations at the European level, but
serves as an alternative lobbying channel for the social partners involved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benedictus, H.
,
de Boer, R.
,
van der Meer, M.
,
Salverda, W.
,
Visser, J.
and
Zijl, M.
(2003) The European Social Dialogue: Development, Sectoral
Variation and Prospects.
Doetinchem: Reed Business Information
.
2.
Branch, A.
and
Greenwood, J.
(2001) ‘European Employers: Social
partners?’, in
H. Compston
and
J. Greenwood
(eds) Social Partnership in the European Union, pp.
41-70.
Houndmills: Palgrave
.
3.
Compston, H.
and
J. Greenwood
, eds (2001) Social Partnership in the European Union.
Houndmills: Palgrave
.
4.
Dølvik, J.E.
and
Visser, J.
(2001) ‘ETUC and European Social Partnership: a
Third Turning-Point?’, in
H. Compston
and
J. Greenwood
(eds) Social Partnership in the European Union, pp.
11-40.
Houndmills: Palgrave
.
5.
European Commission (EC)
(1998) Communication on Adapting and Promoting the Social
Dialogue at Community Level, COM (98) 322.
Luxembourg: OOPEC
.
6.
EC
(2002) The European Social Dialogue: A Force for Innovation
and Change, COM (2002) 341 final.
Luxembourg: OOPEC
.
7.
EC
(2004) Partnership for Change in an Enlarged Europe:
Enhancing the Contribution of European Social Dialogue, COM (2004) 557
final.
Luxembourg: OOPEC
.
8.
Ebbinghaus, B.
and
Visser, J.
(1997) ‘European Labor and Transnational
Solidarity: Challenges, Pathways, and Barriers’, in
J. Klausen
and
L.A. Tilly
(eds) European Integration in Social and Historical Perspective: 1850 to
the Present, pp. 195-221.
Lanham: Rowman and Middlefield
.
9.
Falkner, G.
(1997)
‘Corporatist Governance and Europeanisation: No Future in the
Multi-level Game?’
, European Integration online Papers (EioP),
1(11), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-011a.htm
10.
Falkner, G.
(2003) ‘The Interprofessional Social Dialogue at
European Level: Past and Future’, in
B. Keller
and
H.-W. Platzer
(eds) Industrial Relations and European Integration: Trans- and
Supranational Developments and Prospects, pp. 11-29.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
11.
Jensen, C.S.
,
Madsen, J.S.
and
Due, J.
(1999)
‘Phases and Dynamics in the Development of EU Industrial
Relations Regulation’
, Industrial Relations Journal30(2):
118-134
.
12.
Keller, B.
(2003) ‘Social Dialogue at Sectoral Level: The
Neglected Ingredient of European Industrial Relations’, in
B. Keller
and
H.-W. Platzer
(eds) Industrial relations and European Integration: Trans- and
Supranational Developments and Prospects, pp. 30-57.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
13.
Keller, B.
and
Bansbach, M.
(2001)
‘Social Dialogues: Tranquil Past, Troubled Present and Uncertain Future’
, Industrial Relations Journal32(5):
419-434
.
14.
Keller, B.
and
Sörries, B.
(1998a)
‘The Sectoral Social Dialogue and European Social Policy: More
Fantasy, Fewer Facts’
, European Journal of Industrial Relations4(3):
331-348
.
15.
Keller, B.
and
Sörries, B.
(1998b)
‘The New Social Dialogue: Procedural Structuring, First Results
and Perspectives’
, Industrial Relations Journal European Annual Review 1997:
77-98
.
16.
Lanzalaco, L.
(1992) ‘Coping with Heterogeneity: Peak
Associations of Business within and across Western European
Nations’, in
J. Greenwood
,
J.R. Grote
and
K. Ronit
(eds) Organized Interests and the European Community, pp.
173-205.
London: SAGE
.
17.
Rhodes, M.
(1995) ‘A Regulatory Conundrum: Industrial
Relations and the Social Dimension’, in
S. Leibfried
and
P. Pierson
(eds) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and
Integration pp. 28-122.
Washington: Brookings
.
18.
Streeck, W.
(1994)
‘European Social Policy after Maastricht: The “Social
Dialogue” and “Subsidiarity” ’
, Economic and Industrial Democracy15:
151-177
.
19.
Tyszkiewicz, Z.
(1999) ‘The European Social Dialogue 1985-1998:
A Personal View’, in
E. Gabaglio
and
R. Hoffmann
(eds) European Trade Union Yearbook 1998, pp.
35-47.
Brussels: ETUI
.
20.
Visser, J.
(1996) ‘Traditions and Transitions in Industrial
Relations: A European View’, in
J. van Ruysseveldt
and
J. Visser
(eds) Industrial Relations in Europe: Traditions and Transitions,
pp. 1-41.
London: SAGE
.
21.
Visser, J.
and
Ebbinghaus, B.
(1992) ‘Making the Most of Diversity? European
Integration and Transnational Organization of Labor’, in
J. Greenwood
,
J.R. Grote
and
K. Ronit
(eds) Organized Interests and the European Community, pp.
206-237.
London: SAGE
.
22.
Weber, T.
(2001) ‘The European Sectoral Social
Dialogue’, in
H. Compston
and
J. Greenwood
(eds) Social Partnership in the European Union, pp.
129-153.
Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan
.
