This article introduces an analytical framework for the study of labour standards in trade and compares and contrasts the approaches of the United States and the European Union in introducing a social clause in their Generalized Systems of Preferences. It explores the distinctive characteristics of the two approaches, assesses their industrial relations outcomes and proposes a set of policy guidelines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, P.H.
(1989) `Suspension of Generalized System of Preferences from Chile: The Proper Use of a Trade Provision?', George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics23: 501-530.
2.
Alston, P.
(1980) `Linking Trade and Human Rights', German Yearbook of International Law:126-158.
3.
Alston, P.
(1993) `Labor Rights Provisions in US Trade Law: "Aggressive Unilateralism"?', Human Rights Quarterly15(1): 1-35.
4.
Amato, T.A.
(1990) `Labor Rights Conditionality: United States Trade Legislation and the International Trade Order', New York University Law Review65: 79-125.
5.
Ballon, I.C.
(1987) `The Implications of Making the Denial of Internationally Recognized Worker Rights Actionable Under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974', Virginia Journal of International Law28(1): 73-127.
6.
Bhagwati, J.
(1994) `Free Trade, "Fairness" and the New Protectionism', Occasional Paper No. 96. London: IEA.
7.
Business Europe (1994) `A Guide to the EU Scheme', 23 May: 1.
8.
Charnovitz, S.
(1986) `Fair Labor Standards and International Trade', Journal of World Trade Law (January-February): 61-78.
9.
Cohen, M.
(1993) `Union of Problems: Government Faces Growing Criticism on Labour Relations', Far Eastern Economic Review156(34): 23.
10.
Commission for Labor Cooperation
(1997) Plant Closings and Labor Rights. The Effects of Sudden Plant Closings on Freedom of Association and the Right to Organize in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Dallas: Commission for Labor Cooperation.
11.
Compa, L.
(1993) `Labor Rights and Labor Standards in International Trade', Law and Policy in International Business25(1): 165-191.
12.
Compa, L.
(1995) `Going Multilateral: The Evolution of US Hemispheric Labor Rights Policy Under GSP and NAFTA', Connecticut Journal of International Law10: 337-364.
13.
Compa, L.
(1997) `Another Look at NAFTA', Dissent (Winter): 45-50.
14.
Cook, M.L.
and Katz, H.C., eds (1994) Regional Integration and Industrial Relations in North America. Ithaca: ILR Press.
15.
Davis, B.
(1994) `Inside El Salvador', Worker Rights News1: 12-13.
16.
De Wet, E.
(1995) `Labor Standards in the Globalized Economy: The Inclusion of a Social Clause in the General Agreement On Tariff and Trade/World Trade Organization', Human Rights Quarterly17: 443-462.
17.
Dunne, N.
(1994) `US Puts Weight Behind Third World Labor', International Herald Tribune, 29 January.
18.
Fields, G.S.
(1990) `Labor Standards, Economic Development, and International Trade', in S.A. Herzenberg and J.E Perez-Lopez (eds) Labor Standards and Development in the Global Economy, pp. 19-34. Washington: US Department of Labor.
19.
French, J.D.
(1994) `The Declaration of Philadelphia and the Global Social Charter of the United Nations. 1944-45', in W. Sengenberger and D. Campbell (eds) International Labour Standards and Economic Interdependence, pp. 19-26. Geneva: ILO.
20.
Frundt, H.J.
(1998) Trade Conditions and Labor Rights. Miami: University Press of Florida.
21.
Garver, P.
(1989) `AFL-CIO Consistency Needed on Human Rights', Labor Notes, January: 12.
22.
Griffin, M.J.
(1997) `The North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation: A Flawed Attempt at Promoting Continental Labor Standards', Suffolk Transnational Law Review21: 113-142.
23.
Hansson, G.
(1983) Social Clauses and International Trade. London: Croom Helm.
24.
ICFTU
(1998) `Ending the Menace of Bonded Labor in Pakistan, Submission under the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) of the European Union', http://www.icftu.org/english/els/escl98pakistan.html
25.
ILO
(1998) ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and its Follow-Up. Geneva: ILO.
26.
ILRF
(1992) Summary of 1992 Activities. Washington: ILRF.
27.
IMF
(1988) Trade and Workers' Rights - Time for a Link. Geneva: IMF.
28.
Krueger, A.B.
(1996) Observations on International Labor Standards and Trade. Working Paper 5632. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
29.
Leary, V.A.
(1997) `The WTO and the Social Clause: Post-Singapore', European Journal of International Law8(1): 118-122.
30.
Lee, E.
(1997) `Globalization and Labour Standards: A Review of Issues', International Labour Review136(2): 173-189.
31.
McBeth, J.
(1994) `Deadline Looming: Jakarta Tinkers with Labour Rules to Avoid US Retaliation', Far Eastern Economic Review157(8): 28-29.
32.
Marshall, R.
(1987) Unheard Voices: Labor and Economic Policy in a Competitive World. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Munck, R.
and Waterman, P., eds (1999) Labour Worldwide in the Era of Globalization. London: Macmillan.
34.
Murray, J.
(1996) Corporate Codes of Conduct and Labour Standards. Geneva: ILO.
35.
New Economics Foundation and Catholic Institute for International Relations
(1997) Open Trading. Options for Effective Monitoring of Corporate Codes of Conduct. London: NEF/CIIR.
36.
Perez-Lopez, J.F.
(1990) `Worker Rights in the US Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act', Labor Law JournalApril: 222-234.
37.
Piore, M.J.
(1990) `Labor Standards and Business Strategies', in S.A. Herzenberg and J.F. Perez-Lopez (eds) Labor Standards and Development in the Global Economy, pp. 35-49. Washington: US Department of Labor.
38.
Scherrer, C.
(1996) `The Economic and Political Arguments for and against Social Clauses', Intereconomics31(1): 9-20.
39.
Sengenberger, W.
(1994) `Restructuring at the Global Level: The Role of International Labour Standards', in W. Sengenberger and D. Campbell (eds) Creating Economic Opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring, pp. 395-418. Geneva: ILO.
40.
Stone, K.
(1996) `Four Approaches to Transnational Labour Regulation', in W. Bratton, J. McCahery, S. Picciotto and C. Scott (eds) International Regulatory Competition and Coordination. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41.
Tonya, M.A.
(1992) `Baby Steps Toward International Fair Labor Standards: Evaluating the Child Labor Deterrence Act', Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law24(3): 631-666.
42.
Travis, K.F.
(1992) `Women in Global Production and Worker Rights Provisions in US Trade Laws', Yale Journal of International Law17: 173-194.
43.
Trebilcock, A.
(1998) `What Future for Social Clauses? Differing Institutional Approaches', paper presented at IIRA World Congress, Bologna, Italy.
44.
Tsogas, G.
(1999) `Labour Standards in International Trade Agreements: An Assessment of the Arguments', International Journal of Human Resource Management10(2): 351-375.
45.
Tsogas, G.
(2000) Labor Regulation in a Global Economy. New York: M.E. Sharpe Publishers.
46.
Tsogas, G.
and IDS (1998) Corporate Codes of Conduct and Labour Standards in Global Sourcing. London: IDS and Cardiff Business School.
47.
US Department of Labor
(1996) The Apparel Industry and Codes of Conduct. A Solution to the International Child Labor Problem?Washington: US Department of Labor.
48.
US Department of Labor
(1997) By The Sweat and Toil of Children, vol. IV, Consumer Labels and Child Labor. Washington: US Department of Labor.
49.
US General Accounting Office
(1994) Assessment of the Generalized System of Preferences Program. Washington: US General Accounting Office.
50.
Wachtel, H.
(1998) `Labor's Stake in the WTO', The American Prospect37 (March-April): 34-38.
51.
Waterman, P.
(1998) Globalization, Social Movements and the New Internationalisms. London: Mansell.
52.
Witt, M.
(1988) `Linking Human Rights with International Trade', In These Times, 26 October-1 November: 21.
53.
Zimmerman, J.M.
(1991) `The Overseas Private Investment Corporation and Worker Rights: The Loss of Role Models for Employment Standards in the Foreign Workplace', Hastings International and Comparative Law Review14: 603-618.
