Multi-tasking is crucial to enhance the productivity of robotic systems. Moreover, it is compulsory in many applications. Motivated by these facts, this paper studies a parallel robot with four end-effectors. It is a 9-DOF planar parallel manipulator (PPM) whose moving platform is connected to the base by three serial 5R legs. The moving platform, which is one of the end-effectors, is a triangular plate having two translational and one rotational DOFs. Each of the other three end-effectors is fixed to one different leg and has two translational DOFs. In comparison to its two possible alternatives, namely, a 9-RRR PPM with configurable platform, or a cooperative multi-robot system composed of three 5R and one 3-RRR PPMs, the quadruple-end-effector 3-5R PPM is optimal in terms of the number of links, the number of joints and the number of independent loops. The differential kinematics and singularities of this 9-DOF tripod are analyzed. Moreover, one of its potential applications is demonstrated through numerical simulation. Thanks to its ability of simultaneous execution of four tasks, the studied robot is promising for use in numerous industrial and medical operations.
MerletJ-P.Parallel robots. In: GladwellGML (ed.) Solid mechanics and its applications. 2nd ed.Springer, 2006.
2.
PislaDGaldauBCovaciuF, et al. Safety issues in the development of the experimental model for an innovative medical parallel robot used in brachytherapy. Int J Prod Res2017; 55(3): 684–699.
3.
BeiraRSantos-CarrerasLRogniniG, et al. Dionis: A novel remote-center-of-motion parallel manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. Appl Bionics Biomech2011; 8: 191–208.
4.
VaidaCBirlescuIPislaA, et al. Systematic design of a parallel robotic system for lower limb rehabilitation. IEEE Access2020; 8: 34522–34537.
5.
ValášekMBaumaVŠikaZ.Study of concepts of parallel kinematics machines for advanced manufacturing. Acta Polytech2005; 45(3): 56–60.
6.
OlarraAAxinteDUriarteL, et al. Machining with the WalkingHex: a walking parallel kinematic machine tool for in situ operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol2017; 66(1): 361–364.
7.
XieZXieFLiuX-J, et al. Tracking error prediction informed motion control of a parallel machine tool for high-performance machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2021; 164: 103714.
8.
AbdelaalAELiuJHongN, et al. Parallelism in autonomous robotic surgery. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2021; 6(2): 1824–1831.
9.
InoueYNakamotoK.Development of a CAPP system for multi-tasking machine tools to deal with complicated machining operations. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2020; 14(1): 19-00341.
10.
AmirkhaniGFarahmandFYazdianSM, et al. An extended algorithm for autonomous grasping of soft tissues during robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg2020; 16(5): e2122.
11.
LiRQiaoH.A survey of methods and strategies for high-precision robotic grasping and assembly tasks—some new trends. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2019; 24(6): 2718–2732.
12.
YiB-JNaHYLeeJH, et al. Design of a parallel-type gripper mechanism. Int J Robot Res2002; 21(7): 661–676.
13.
MohamedMGGosselinCM.Design and analysis of kinematically redundant parallel manipulators with configurable platforms. IEEE Trans Robot2005; 21(3): 277–287.
14.
LambertPHerderJL.Parallel robots with configurable platforms: Fundamental aspects of a new class of robotic architectures. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2016; 230(3): 463–472.
15.
HoevenaarsAGLGosselinCLambertP, et al. A systematic approach for the Jacobian analysis of parallel manipulators with two end-effectors. Mech Mach Theory2017; 109: 171–194.
Gallardo-AlvaradoJTinajero-CamposJH.A parallel manipulator with planar configurable platform and three end-effectors. Math Probl Eng2019; 2019: 7972837.
18.
Gallardo-AlvaradoJ.A Gough–Stewart parallel manipulator with configurable platform and multiple end-effectors. Meccanica2020; 55(3): 597–613.
19.
TianCZhangD.A new family of generalized parallel manipulators with configurable moving platforms. Mech Mach Theory2020; 153: 103997.
20.
TianCZhangD.Design and analysis of novel kinematically redundant reconfigurable generalized parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory2021; 166: 104481.
21.
TianCZhangDTangH, et al. Structure synthesis of reconfigurable generalized parallel mechanisms with configurable platforms. Mech Mach Theory2021; 160: 104281.
22.
MarchiTMottolaGPortaJM, et al. Position and singularity analysis of a class of planar parallel manipulators with a reconfigurable end-effector. Machines2021; 9(1): 7.
23.
GosselinCAngelesJ.The optimum kinematic design of a planar three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator. ASME J Mech Trans Autom Des1988; 110(1): 35–41.
24.
ArsenaultMBoudreauR.The synthesis of three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel mechanisms with revolute joints (3-RRR) for an optimal singularity-free workspace. J Robot Syst2004; 21(5): 259–274.
25.
DouR.Optimum design of 3-RRR planar parallel manipulators. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2010; 224(2): 411–418.
26.
WangKWuXBaiS.Optimum transmission performance of 3-RRR planar parallel manipulators and sensitivity analysis. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf2021; 15(5): 21-00107.
27.
ÖzdemirM.Hypersingularities of 3-RRR planar parallel robots. Proc Rom Acad Ser A2021; 22(4): 353–360.
IderSK.Singularity robust inverse dynamics of planar 2-RPR parallel manipulators. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2004; 218(7): 721–730.
30.
KucukS.A dexterity comparison for 3-DOF planar parallel manipulators with two kinematic chains using genetic algorithms. Mechatronics2009; 19(6): 868–877.
31.
WuJWangJWangL, et al. Performance comparison of three planar 3-DOF parallel manipulators with 4-RRR, 3-RRR and 2-RRR structures. Mechatronics2010; 20(4): 510–517.
32.
WuJWangJYouZ.A comparison study on the dynamics of planar 3-DOF 4-RRR, 3-RRR and 2-RRR parallel manipulators. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2011; 27(1): 150–156.
33.
AgheliMNestingerSS.Comprehensive closed-form solution for the reachable workspace of 2-RPR planar parallel mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory2014; 74: 102–116.
34.
ÖzdemirM.Singularity analysis of two-legged planar parallel robots with three degrees of freedom. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2018; 232(4): 657–664.
35.
GallantABoudreauRGallantM.Geometric determination of the dexterous workspace of n-RRRR and n-RRPR manipulators. Mech Mach Theory2012; 51: 159–171.
36.
WenKGosselinC.Kinematically redundant hybrid robots with simple singularity conditions and analytical inverse kinematic solutions. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2019; 4(4): 3828–3835.
37.
ChaS-HLaskyTAVelinskySA.Kinematically-redundant variations of the 3-RRR mechanism and local optimization-based singularity avoidance. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2007; 35(1): 15–38.
38.
ChaS-HLaskyTAVelinskySA.Determination of the kinematically redundant active prismatic joint variable ranges of a planar parallel mechanism for singularity-free trajectories. Mech Mach Theory2009; 44(5): 1032–1044.
39.
ArsenaultMBoudreauRNoklebyS.Determination of the available wrench set of a 3-RPRR kinematically-redundant planar parallel manipulator. Mech Mach Theory2022; 169: 104628.
40.
Van Der WijkVKrutSPierrotF, et al. Design and experimental evaluation of a dynamically balanced redundant planar 4-RRR parallel manipulator. Int J Robot Res2013; 32(6): 744–759.
41.
ZhangXZhangX.A comparative study of planar 3-RRR and 4-RRR mechanisms with joint clearances. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2016; 40: 24–33.
42.
LiuYWuJWangL, et al. Determination of the maximal singularity-free zone of 4-RRR redundant parallel manipulators and its application on investigating length ratios of links. Robotica2016; 34(9): 2039–2055.
43.
MejiaLSimasHMartinsD.Wrench capability in redundant planar parallel manipulators with net degree of constraint equal to four, five or six. Mech Mach Theory2016; 105: 58–79.
44.
LucesMMillsJKBenhabibB. A review of redundant parallel kinematic mechanisms. J Intell Robot Syst2017; 86(2): 175–198.
45.
Cervantes-SánchezJJHernández-RodrıguezJCRendón-SánchezJG.On the workspace, assembly configurations and singularity curves of the RRRRR-type planar manipulator. Mech Mach Theory2000; 35(8): 1117–1139.
46.
MachoEAltuzarraOPintoC, et al. Workspaces associated to assembly modes of the 5R planar parallel manipulator. Robotica2008; 26(3): 395–403.
47.
ÖzdemirM.High-order singularities of 5R planar parallel robots. Robotica2019; 37(2): 233–245.
48.
WuJWangJWangL.A comparison study of two planar 2-DOF parallel mechanisms: one with 2-RRR and the other with 3-RRR structures. Robotica2010; 28(6): 937–942.
49.
JinSKimJSeoT.Optimization of a redundantly actuated 5R symmetrical parallel mechanism based on structural stiffness. Robotica2015; 33(9): 1973–1983.
50.
LiangDSongYSunT, et al. Optimum design of a novel redundantly actuated parallel manipulator with multiple actuation modes for high kinematic and dynamic performance. Nonlinear Dyn2016; 83(1–2): 631–658.
51.
WangLZhangZShaoZ, et al. Analysis and optimization of a novel planar 5R parallel mechanism with variable actuation modes. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2019; 56: 178–190.
52.
BoldeaITuteleaLNMunteanN, et al. Robotics electric actuators: recent progress in high torque density designs and their advanced motion control: a review. Proc Rom Acad Ser A2020; 21(4): 337–355.
53.
ChapraSCCanaleRP.Numerical methods for engineers. 7th ed.McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
54.
GosselinCAngelesJ.Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains. IEEE Trans Robot Autom1990; 6(3): 281–290.
55.
ChoudhuryPGhosalA.Singularity and controllability analysis of parallel manipulators and closed-loop mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory2000; 35(10): 1455–1479.
56.
BandyopadhyaySGhosalA.Analysis of configuration space singularities of closed-loop mechanisms and parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory2004; 39(5): 519–544.
57.
IderSK.Inverse dynamics of parallel manipulators in the presence of drive singularities. Mech Mach Theory2005; 40(1): 33–44.
58.
JuiCKKSunQ.Path tracking of parallel manipulators in the presence of force singularity. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control2005; 127(4): 550–563.
59.
BriotSArakelianV.Optimal force generation in parallel manipulators for passing through the singular positions. Int J Robot Res2008; 27(8): 967–983.
60.
ÖzdemirM.Optimization in motion planning for parallel robots passing through singular positions. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ2017; 32(4): 1089–1096.
61.
ÖzdemirM.Singularity robust balancing of parallel manipulators following inconsistent trajectories. Robotica2016; 34(9): 2027–2038.
ÖzdemirM.Dynamic analysis of planar parallel robots considering singularities and different payloads. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2017; 46: 114–121.
64.
ÖzdemirM.Removal of singularities in the inverse dynamics of parallel robots. Mech Mach Theory2017; 107: 71–86.
65.
DahotreNBHarimkarSP.Laser fabrication and machining of materials. Springer, 2008.
66.
LuteyAHAAscariAFortunatoA, et al. Long-pulse quasi-CW laser cutting of metals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2018; 94(1-4): 155–162.
67.
MushtaqRTWangYRehmanM, et al. State-of-the-art and trends in CO2 laser cutting of polymeric materials: a review. Materials2020; 13(17): 3839.
68.
LeiHLijunL.A study of laser cutting engineering ceramics. Opt Laser Technol1999; 31(8): 531–538.
69.
StaehrRBluemelSJaeschkeP, et al. Laser cutting of composites—Two approaches toward an industrial establishment. J Laser Appl2016; 28(2): 022203.
70.
PashkevichAPDolguiABChumakovOA.Multiobjective optimization of robot motion for laser cutting applications. Int J Comput Integr Manuf2004; 17(2): 171–183.
71.
DolguiAPashkevichA.Manipulator motion planning for high-speed robotic laser cutting. Int J Prod Res2009; 47(20): 5691–5715.
72.
UzunogluEDedeMICKiperG. Trajectory planning for a planar macro-micro manipulator of a laser-cutting machine. Ind Robot2016; 43(5): 513–523.
73.
DewilRVansteenwegenPCattrysseD.A review of cutting path algorithms for laser cutters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2016; 87(5-8): 1865–1884.
74.
AgarwalANasaCBandyopadhyayS.Dynamic singularity avoidance for parallel manipulators using a task-priority based control scheme. Mech Mach Theory2016; 96: 107–126.
75.
GaoYChenKGaoH, et al. Small-angle perturbation method for moving platform orientation to avoid singularity of asymmetrical 3-RRR planner parallel manipulator. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2019; 41(12): 538.
76.
ParkHAhnD-G.Knowledge-based CNC torch path generation for laser cutting of planar shapes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2008; 37(3–4): 302–313.
77.
HashemzadehMPowellJVoiseyKT.Fibre laser piercing of mild steel: the effects of power intensity, gas type and pressure. Opt Lasers Eng2014; 55: 143–149.
78.
PolyaninADZaitsevVF.Handbook of ordinary differential equations: exact solutions, methods, and problems. CRC Press, 2018.
