In this article, we develop a novel composite adaptive control system for the dive-plane maneuvers and parameter identification of a multi-input multi-output submarine model. The composite adaptive control system consists of (1) an input–output feedback linearizing control law and (2) an identifier formed by gradient algorithm-based two-parameter estimation laws. Unlike the existing adaptive systems for autonomous underwater vehicles and submarines, a novelty of this composite identifier lies in the use of regressor matrix integral feedback for enhancement in parameter excitation. By the Lyapunov analysis, asymptotic convergence of the depth and pitch angle tracking errors is established. Simulation results show precise depth and pitch angle control, estimation of all model parameters, and robustness to random and sinusoidal disturbance inputs.
FossenTI. Guidance and control of ocean vehicles. New York: Wiley Publications, 1994.
2.
PresteroT. Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle. MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 2001.
KristicMKanellakopoulosIKokotovicP. Nonlinear and adaptive control design. New York: Wiley, 1995.
5.
IoannouPASunJ. Stable and robust adaptive control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995, pp.85–134.
6.
FradkovALMiroshnikIVNikiforovVO. Nonlinear and adaptive control of complex systems. Dordrecht; London: Springer, 1999.
7.
ZongGWangYKarimiHR, et al. Observer-based adaptive neural tracking control for a class of nonlinear systems with prescribed performance and input dead-zone constraints. Neural Networks2022; 147: 126–135.
8.
XuQZongGChenY, et al. Command filter-based adaptive neural network controller design for uncertain nonsmooth nonlinear systems with output constraint. Int J Adapt Control2023; 37(2): 474–496.
9.
YangDFengQZongG. Asynchronous bumpless transfer finite-time H∞ control for Markovian jump systems with application to circuit system. IEEE T Circuits: II2022; 69(12): 4929–4933.
10.
YangDZongGNguangSK, et al. Bumpless transfer H∞ anti-disturbance control of switching Markovian LPV systems under the hybrid switching. IEEE T Cybernetics2022; 52(5): 2833–2845.
11.
YangDZongGSuSF, et al. Time-driven adaptive control of switched systems with application to electro-hydraulic unit. IEEE T Cybernetics2022; 52(11): 11906–11915.
12.
YouS-SLimT-WJeongS-K. General path-following manoeuvres for an underwater vehicle using robust control synthesis. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2010; 224(8): 960–969.
13.
PetrichJStilwellDJ. Robust control for an autonomous underwater vehicle that suppresses pitch and yaw coupling. Ocean Eng2011; 38(1): 197–204.
14.
ChinCSLauMWSLowE, et al. Robust and decoupled cascaded control system of underwater robotic vehicle for stabilization and pipeline tracking. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2008; 222(4): 261–278.
15.
QiaoLYiBWuD, et al. Design of three exponentially convergent robust controllers for the trajectory tracking of autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng2017; 134: 157–172.
16.
Trebi-OllennuAWhiteBA. Non-linear robust control designs for a remotely operated underwater vehicle depth control system. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering1996; 210(3): 201–214.
17.
ChoGRLiJHParkD, et al. Robust trajectory tracking of autonomous underwater vehicles using back-stepping control and time delay estimation. Ocean Eng2020; 201: 107131.
18.
LiuQLiM. Position control for an autonomous underwater vehicle under noisy conditions. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2022; 236(6): 1119–1132.
19.
KhodayariMHParizNBalochianS. Robust stabilization for an autonomous underwater vehicle motion based on descriptor time-delay model. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2022; 236(9): 1692–1708.
20.
ElmokademTZribiMYoucef-ToumiK. Control for dynamic positioning and way-point tracking of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles using sliding mode control. J Intell Robot Syst2019; 95: 1113–1132.
21.
JoeHKimMYuS-C. Second-order sliding-mode controller for autonomous underwater vehicle in the presence of unknown disturbances. Nonlinear Dynam2014; 78: 183–196.
22.
YanZWangMXuJ. Robust adaptive sliding mode control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles with uncertain dynamics. Ocean Eng2019; 173: 802–809.
23.
YanZGongPZhangW, et al. Model predictive control of autonomous underwater vehicles for trajectory tracking with external disturbances. Ocean Eng2020; 217: 107884.
24.
ZhangYLiuXLuoM, et al. MPC-based 3-D trajectory tracking for an autonomous underwater vehicle with constraints in complex ocean environments. Ocean Eng2019; 189: 106309.
25.
LiSWangXZhangL. Finite-time output feedback tracking control for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J Oceanic Eng2015; 40(3): 727–751.
26.
AliNTawiahIZhangW. Finite-time extended state observer based nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control of autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng2020; 218: 108179.
27.
LiuXZhangMYangC, et al. Finite-time tracking control for autonomous underwater vehicle based on an improved non-singular terminal sliding mode manifold. Int J Control2022; 95(3): 840–849.
28.
SunHZongGCuiJ, et al. Fixed-time sliding mode output feedback tracking control for autonomous underwater vehicle with prescribed performance constraint. Ocean Eng2022; 247: 110673.
29.
DoKDPanJJiangZP. Robust and adaptive path following for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng2004; 31(16): 1967–1997.
30.
LiJHLeePM. Design of an adaptive nonlinear controller for depth control of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng2005; 32(17–18): 2165–2181.
31.
DaiYYuS. Design of an indirect adaptive controller for the trajectory tracking of UVMS. Ocean Eng2018; 151: 234–245.
32.
FossenTILekkasAM. Direct and indirect adaptive integral line-of-sight path-following controllers for marine craft exposed to ocean currents. Int J Adapt Control2017; 31(4): 445–463.
33.
GuerreroJTorresJCreuzeV, et al. Trajectory tracking for autonomous underwater vehicle: an adaptive approach. Ocean Eng2019; 172: 511–522.
34.
NarasimhanMSinghSN. Adaptive optimal control of an autonomous underwater vehicle in the dive plane using dorsal fins. Ocean Eng2006; 33(3–4): 404–416.
35.
NaikMSSinghSNMittalR. Indirect adaptive output feedback control of a biorobotic AUV using pectoral-like mechanical fins. Bioinspir Biomim2009; 4(2): 026001.
36.
LiuSLiuYLiangX, et al. Uncertainty observation-based adaptive succinct fuzzy-neuro dynamic surface control for trajectory tracking of fully actuated underwater vehicle system with input saturation. Nonlinear Dynam2019; 98(3): 1683–1699.
37.
KumarNRaniM. An efficient hybrid approach for trajectory tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicles. Appl Ocean Res2020; 95(1): 102053.
38.
DuanKFongSChenCP. Multilayer neural networks-based control of underwater vehicles with uncertain dynamics and disturbances. Nonlinear Dynam2020; 100: 3555–3573.
39.
SlotineJ-JELiW. Composite adaptive control of robot manipulators. Automatica1989; 25(4): 509–519.
40.
LavretskyE. Combined/composite model reference adaptive control. IEEE T Automat Contr2009; 54(11): 2692–2697.
41.
GhavidelHFKalatAA. Robust control for MIMO hybrid dynamical system of underwater vehicles by composite adaptive fuzzy estimation of uncertainties. Nonlinear Dynam2017; 89: 2347–2365.
42.
MakavitaCDJayasingheSGNguyenHD, et al. Experimental comparison of two composite MRAC methods for UUV operations with low adaptation gains. IEEE J Oceanic Eng2020; 45(1): 227–246.
43.
LiuJDuJ. Composite learning tracking control for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicle with unknown dynamics and disturbances in three-dimension space. Appl Ocean Res2021; 112: 102686.
44.
MartinezDMO. Nonlinear optimal control strategies for maneuverability analysis of manned submarines. Master’s Thesis, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, Cartagena, 2011.
45.
BabaogluOK. Designing an automatic control system for a submarine. Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 1988.
46.
DumluDIstefanopulosY. Design of an adaptive controller for submersibles via multimodel gain scheduling. Ocean Eng1995; 22(6): 593–614.
47.
DemirciUKeresteciogluF. A re-configuring sliding-mode controller with adjustable robustness. Ocean Eng2004; 31(13): 1669–1682.
48.
LeeKWSinghSN. Noncertainty-equivalent multi-variable adaptive control of submersibles using filtered signals. Ocean Eng2012; 53: 98–110.
49.
LeeKWSinghSN. Multi-input submarine control via L1 adaptive feedback despite uncertainties. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2014; 228(5): 330–347.
50.
LeeKWSinghSN. Nonlinear adaptive trajectory control of multi-input multi-output submarines with input constraints. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2016; 230(2): 164–183.
51.
AranovskiySBobtsovAOrtegaR, et al. Performance enhancement of parameter estimators via dynamic regressor extension and mixing. IEEE T Automat Contr2017; 62(7): 3546–3550.
52.
RoySBBhasinSKarIN. Combined MRAC for unknown MIMO LTI systems with parameter convergence. IEEE T Automat Contr2018; 63(1): 283–290.
53.
RoySBBhasinSKarIN. Composite adaptive control of uncertain Euler-Lagrange systems with parameter convergence without PE condition. Asian J Control2020; 22(1): 1–10.
54.
LeeKWSinghSN. Composite adaptive control and identification of MIMO aeroelastic system with enhanced parameter excitation. J Aerospace Eng2022; 35(6) 0402293.
55.
LeeKWSinghSN. Composite adaptive attitude control of asteroid-orbiting spacecraft with regressor integral excitation. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2022; 58(5): 4814–4823.
56.
LeeKWSinghSN. Composite adaptive orbit control and parameter estimation by integral excitation around asteroids. J Guid Control Dynam2023; 46: 1842–1850.
