In this article, we have designed an active prosthesis for the lower limb of a human. The unique design incorporates an exoskeletal extension that serves as a low-cost sensory framework, providing feedback on residual signals, namely the states of the hip and thigh. The controller takes advantage of system modeling and employs a simple proportional–derivative control. A stability analysis has been conducted. We have also provided simulations and analysis of the active prosthesis to evaluate the effectiveness of the design and control.
Cruz Á.Issste: se realizan en mèxico 128 mil amputaciones de extremidades al año (Technical Report). La Jornada, 3March2016, p.39.
2.
FerreiraCReisLPSantosCP. Review of control strategies for lower limb prostheses. In: Robot 2015: second Iberian robotics conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 19–21 November, 2015, pp.209–220. Cham: Springer.
3.
LawsonBEMitchellJTruexD, et al. A robotic leg prosthesis: design, control, and implementation. IEEE Robot Autom Mag2014; 21(4): 70–81.
4.
Martinez-HernandezURubio-SolisADehghani-SanijAA. Recognition of walking activity and prediction of gait periods with a CNN and first-order MC strategy. In: 2018 7th IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (Biorob), Enschede, 26–29 August 2018, pp.897–902. New York: IEEE.
5.
TuckerMROlivierJPagelA, et al. Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review. J Neuroeng Rehabil2015; 12(1): 1–30.
6.
KrauszNEHargroveLJ.A survey of teleceptive sensing for wearable assistive robotic devices. Sensors2019; 19(23): 5238.
7.
RaspopovicSPetriniFM. A computational model for the design of lower-limb sensorimotor neuroprostheses. In: International conference on NeuroRehabilitation, Pisa, 16–20 October 2018, pp.49–53. Cham: Springer.
8.
KriegeskorteNDouglasPK.Interpreting encoding and decoding models. Curr Opin Neurobiol2019; 55: 167–179.
9.
SimanovaIVan GervenMOostenveldR, et al. Identifying object categories from event-related EEG: toward decoding of conceptual representations. PLoS ONE2010; 5(12): e14465.
10.
GlaserJIBenjaminASChowdhuryRH, et al. Machine learning for neural decoding. eNeuro2020; 7(4): 1–16.
11.
WeirRSensingerJWKutzM.Design of artificial arms and hands for prosthetic applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
12.
SpaniasJSimonAFinucaneS, et al. Online adaptive neural control of a robotic lower limb prosthesis. J Neural Eng2018; 15(1): 016015.
13.
SupFBoharaAGoldfarbM.Design and control of a powered transfemoral prosthesis. Int J Rob Res2008; 27(2): 263–273.
14.
WenYGaoXSiJ, et al. Robotic knee prosthesis real-time control using reinforcement learning with human in the loop. In: SunFLiuHHuD (eds) International conference on cognitive systems and signal processing. Cham: Springer, 2019, pp.463–473.
15.
PitkinMR.Biomechanics of lower limb prosthetics. Cham: Springer, 2009.
16.
BeckerlePChristOSchürmannT, et al. A human–machinecentered design method for (powered) lower limb prosthetics. Rob Auton Syst2017; 95: 1–12.
17.
RohaniFRichterHVan den BogertAJ.Optimal design and control of an electromechanical transfemoral prosthesis with energy regeneration. PLoS ONE2017; 12(11): e0188266.
18.
EleryTRezazadehSNeslerC, et al. Design and benchtop validation of a powered knee-ankle prosthesis with high-torque, low-impedance actuators. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 21–25 May 2018, pp.2788–2795. New York: IEEE.
19.
TorrealbaRRFonseca-RojasED. Toward the development of knee prostheses: review of current active devices. Appl Mech Rev2019; 71(3): 030801.
20.
PeñaCÁRodríguezJLMPèrezYSC, et al. Disenõ de prótesis externa de rodilla. In: VII Conferencia científica internacional de ingeniería mecánica. COMEC-2012, Cayo Santa María, Cuba, 5–8 November, 2012.
21.
ZhangKZhangWXiaoW, et al. Sequential decision fusion for environmental classification in assistive walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2019; 27(9): 1780–1790.
22.
ZhangKde SilvaCWFuC.Sensor fusion for predictive control of human-prosthesis-environment dynamics in assistive walking: a survey. arXiv2019.
23.
SahooSPratiharDKMukhopadhyayS.A novel supervisory control scheme to tackle variations in step length for walking with powered ankle prosthesis. Biomed Signal Process Control2018; 46: 212–220.
24.
RaiVSharmaARombokasE. Mode-free control of prosthetic lower limbs. In: 2019 international symposium on medical robotics (ISMR), Atlanta, GA, 3–5 April 2019, pp.1–7. New York: IEEE.
25.
AragonFCHuegelJCVargas-MartinezA, et al. Comparison between classic control systems techniques against adaptive and nonlinear control techniques in a lower limb prostheses. In: 2019 4th international conference on control and robotics engineering (ICCRE), Nanjing, China, 20–23 April 2019, pp.75–78. New York: IEEE.
26.
LiuMZhangFDatserisP, et al. Improving finite state impedance control of active-transfemoral prosthesis using Dempster-Shafer based state transition rules. J Intell Robot Syst2014; 76(3): 461–474.
27.
RyuJLeeBHMaengJ, et al. SEMG-signal and IMU sensor-based gait sub-phase detection and prediction using a user-adaptive classifier. Med Eng Phys2019; 69: 50–57.
28.
SchirrmeisterRTSpringenbergJTFiedererLDJ, et al. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization. Hum Brain Mapp2017; 38(11): 5391–5420.
29.
YoungAJSimonAMFeyNP, et al. Intent recognition in a powered lower limb prosthesis using time history information. Ann Biomed Eng2014; 42(3): 631–641.
30.
KhademiGSimonD. Convolutional neural networks for environmentally aware locomotion mode recognition of lower-limb amputees. In: ASME 2019 dynamic systems and control conference, Park City, UT, 8–11 October 2019.
31.
LiSZhangLDiaoX.Deep-learning-based human intention prediction using RGB images and optical flow. J Intell Robot Syst2020; 97(1): 95–107.
32.
SimonAMIngrahamKASpaniasJA, et al. Delaying ambulation mode transition decisions improves accuracy of a flexible control system for powered knee-ankle prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2016; 25(8): 1164–1171.
33.
LaschowskiBMcPheeJAndrysekJ.Lower-limb prostheses and exoskeletons with energy regeneration: mechatronic design and optimization review. J Mech Robot2019; 11(4): 040801.
34.
ChaurandRÁLeónLRPMuñozELG. Dimensiones antropomètricas de población latinoamericana. Guadalajara, Mexico: CUAAD, Universidad de Guadalajara, 2007.
35.
ZhengHShenX.Design and control of a pneumatically actuated transtibial prosthesis. J Bionic Eng2015; 12(2): 217–226.
36.
PitkinMR.Mechanical outcomes of a rolling-joint prosthetic foot and its performance in the dorsiflexion phase of transtibial amputee gait. J Prosthet Orthot1995; 7(4): 114–123.
37.
ColomboGFacoettiGRizziC.A digital patient for computer-aided prosthesis design. Interface Focus2013; 3(2): 20120082.
38.
ChoudharyPMishraPDwivediVR.A proprioceptive discussion on mechanism used for knee joint from 2000-2012: a literature review. Int J Sci Res Pub2014; 4(5): 1–7.
39.
AmadorBTTorrealbaRRRojasM, et al. Metodología para dimensionamiento de mecanismo policèntrico de rodilla utilizando anàlisis de marcha y algoritmos genèticos. Methodology to gauge a four-bar linkage prosthetic knee mechanism based on gait analysis and genetic algorithms. Rev Ing Biomed2012; 6(11): 30–45.
40.
WindrichMGrimmerMChristO, et al. Active lower limb prosthetics: a systematic review of design issues and solutions. Biomed Eng Online2016; 15(3): 5–19.
41.
SpongMWHutchinsonSVidyasagarM.Robot modeling and control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
42.
WinterDA.Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
