In order to improve the adaptability and tracking performance of intelligent vehicles under complex driving conditions, and simulate the manipulation characteristics of the real driver in the driver–vehicle–road closed-loop system, a kind of adaptive preview time model for intelligent vehicle driver model is proposed. This article builds the intelligent vehicle driver model based on optimal preview control theory and the basic preview time is identified to minimize path error under various conditions based on particle swarm optimization. Then, the ideal compensation preview time is constructed in various conditions and the appropriate factors affecting compensation preview time are filtered out according to correlation analysis. Moreover, the architecture and training procedure of deep network is specified for compensation preview time prediction. Finally, the adaptive preview time is modeled by combining the basic preview time with the compensation preview time and the validity of adaptive preview time model is verified by the driver–vehicle–road closed-loop system under normal and aggressive driving conditions. The results show that the proposed adaptive preview time model can help intelligent vehicles better adapt complex driving conditions and effectively improve the path-following performance.
ChuZWuCSepehriN. Automated steering controller design for vehicle lane keeping combining linear active disturbance rejection control and quantitative feedback theory. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(7): 937–948.
2.
ZhuHYuenKVMihaylovaL, et al. Overview of environment perception for intelligent vehicles. IEEE Trans Intel Transport Syst2017; 18(10): 2584–2601.
3.
WangRYeQCaiY, et al. Analyzing the influence of automatic steering system on the trajectory tracking accuracy of intelligent vehicle. Adv Eng Softw2018; 121: 188–196.
4.
ChenLQinDXuX, et al. A path and velocity planning method for lane changing collision avoidance of intelligent vehicle based on cubic 3-D Bezier curve. Adv Eng Softw2019; 132: 65–73.
5.
GindeleTBrechtelSDillmannR. Learning driver behavior models from traffic observations for decision making and planning. IEEE Intel Transp Syst Mag2015; 7(1): 69–79.
6.
OhKYiK. A predictive driver model with physical constraints for closed loop simulation of vehicle-driver system. In: 17th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Qingdao, China, 8–11 October 2014, pp.3126–3131. New York: IEEE.
7.
TanDChenWWangH. On the use of Monte-Carlo simulation and deep Fourier neural network in lane departure warning. IEEE Intel Transp Syst Mag2017; 9(4): 76–90.
8.
XieJGongJWuS, et al. A personalized curve driving model for intelligent vehicle. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on unmanned systems (ICUS), Beijing, China, 27–29 October 2017, pp.301–306. New York: IEEE.
9.
IguchiM. Manual control systems. J Japan Soc Mech Eng1959; 62(481): 215–222.
10.
McRuerDTJexHR. A review of quasi-linear pilot models. IEEE Trans Human Factor Electr1967; 8(3): 231–249.
11.
KondoMAjimineA. Driver’s sight point and dynamics of the driver-vehicle-system related to it. SAE technical paper 680104, 1968.
12.
MacAdamCC. An optimal preview control for linear systems. J Dynam Syst Meas Control1980; 102(3): 188–190.
13.
GuoKGuanH. Modelling of driver/vehicle directional control system. Veh Syst Dynam1993; 22(3–4): 141–184.
14.
NorouziAKazemiRAzadiS. Vehicle lateral control in the presence of uncertainty for lane change maneuver using adaptive sliding mode control with fuzzy boundary layer. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(1): 12–28.
15.
ColeDPickAOdhamsA. Predictive and linear quadratic methods for potential application to modelling driver steering control. Veh Syst Dynam2006; 44(3): 259–284.
16.
JingHWangRLiC, et al. Differential steering-based electric vehicle lateral dynamics control with rollover consideration. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2020; 234(3): 338–348.
17.
XiGQunY. Driver–vehicle–environment closed-loop simulation of handling and stability using fuzzy control theory. Veh Syst Dynam1994; 23(S1): 172–181.
18.
LinYTangPZhangW, et al. Artificial neural network modelling of driver handling behaviour in a driver-vehicle-environment system. Int J Veh Design2005; 37(1): 24–45.
19.
QuinteroCGLópezJOPinillaACC. Driver behavior classification model based on an intelligent driving diagnosis system. In: 2012 15th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems, Anchorage, AK, 16–19 September 2012, pp.894–899. New York: IEEE.
20.
RaksincharoensakPMizushimaTNagaiM. Direct yaw moment control system based on driver behaviour recognition. Veh Syst Dynam2008; 46(S1): 911–921.
21.
NaXColeDJ. Game-theoretic modeling of the steering interaction between a human driver and a vehicle collision avoidance controller. IEEE Trans Human Mach Syst2014; 45(1): 25–38.
22.
WindridgeDShaukatAHollnagelE. Characterizing driver intention via hierarchical perception–action modeling. IEEE Trans Human Mach Syst2012; 43(1): 17–31.
23.
GaoHZhangXLiuY, et al. Cloud model approach for lateral control of intelligent vehicle systems. Scientif Program2016; 2016: 6842891.
24.
ChenTChenLXuX, et al. Passive actuator-fault-tolerant path following control of autonomous ground electric vehicle with in-wheel motors. Adv Eng Softw2019; 134: 22–30.
25.
MacAdamCC. Application of an optimal preview control for simulation of closed-loop automobile driving. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet1981; 11(6): 393–399.
26.
KhosraviALachiniZSarhadiP. Predictor-based model reference adaptive control for a vehicle lateral dynamics considering uncertainties. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2015; 229(9): 797–807.
27.
ChenTChenLXuX, et al. Simultaneous path following and lateral stability control of 4WD-4WS autonomous electric vehicles with actuator saturation. Adv Eng Softw2019; 128: 46–54.
28.
LinCFUlsoyAGLeBlancDJ. Vehicle dynamics and external disturbance estimation for vehicle path prediction. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech2000; 8(3): 508–518.
29.
MacAdamCC. Development of driver/vehicle steering interaction models for dynamic analysis. Technical report, The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, November1988.
30.
BoliaPWeiskircherTMüllerS. Driver steering model for closed-loop steering function analysis. Veh Syst Dynam2014; 52(sup1): 16–30.
31.
DaliABouharchoucheADiafS. Parameter identification of photovoltaic cell/module using genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). In: 2015 3rd international conference on control, engineering & information technology (CEIT), Tlemcen, Algeria, 25–27 May 2015, pp.1–6. New York: IEEE.
32.
ZhuBLiuZZhaoJ, et al. Driver behavior characteristics identification strategies based on bionic intelligent algorithms. IEEE Trans Human Mach Syst2018; 48(6): 572–581.
33.
EmaraHMElshamyWBahgatA. Parameter identification of induction motor using modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, Cambridge, 30 June–2 July 2008, pp.841–847. New York: IEEE.
34.
BenestyJChenJHuangY. On the importance of the Pearson correlation coefficient in noise reduction. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Proces2008; 16(4): 757–765.
35.
ZhouFZhangZChenD. Real-time fault diagnosis using deep fusion of features extracted by parallel long short-term memory with peephole and convolutional neural network. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering. Epub ahead of print 24August2020. DOI: 10.1177/0959651820948291.
36.
JainASinghAKoppulaHS, et al. Recurrent neural networks for driver activity anticipation via sensory-fusion architecture. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Stockholm, 16–21 May 2016, pp.3118–3125. New York: IEEE.
37.
ErgenTKozatSS. Online training of LSTM networks in distributed systems for variable length data sequences. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst2017; 29(10): 5159–5165.
38.
SrivastavaNHintonGKrizhevskyA, et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Lear Res2014; 15(1): 1929–1958.
39.
KrizhevskyASutskeverIHintonGE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 26th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, 3–6 December 2012, pp.1097–1105. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
40.
WangXJiangRLiL, et al. Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning. IEEE Trans Intel Transport Syst2017; 19(3): 910–920.
41.
YufangLMingnuoCWanzhongZ. Investigating long-term vehicle speed prediction based on BP-LSTM algorithms. IET Intelligent Transport Systems2019; 13(8): 1281–1290.
