BoldeaINasarSA. Linear electric actuators and generators. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
2.
EgamiTTsuchiyaT. Disturbance suppression control with preview action of linear DC brushless motor. IEEE T Ind Electron1995; 42(5): 494–500.
3.
SanadaMMorimotoSTakedaY. Interior permanent magnet linear synchronous motor for high-performance drives. IEEE T Ind Appl1997; 33(5): 966–972.
4.
LinCH. Precision motion control of a linear permanent magnet synchronous machine based on linear optical-ruler sensor and Hall sensor. Sensors2018; 18(10): E3345.
5.
KanellakopoulosIKokotovicPVMorseAS. Systematic design of adaptive controller for feedback linearizable system. IEEE T Automat Contr1991; 36(11): 1241–1253.
6.
BartoliniGFerraraAGiacominiL, et al. Properties of a combined adaptive/second-order sliding mode control algorithm for some classes of uncertain nonlinear systems. IEEE T Automat Contr2000; 45(7): 1334–1341.
7.
LinCH. A backstepping control of LSM drive systems using adaptive modified recurrent Laguerre OPNNUO. J Power Electron2016; 16(2): 598–609.
8.
LinCH. Nonlinear backstepping control design of LSM drive system using adaptive modified recurrent Laguerre orthogonal polynomial network. Int J Control Autom2017; 15(2): 905–917.
9.
CobanR. Backstepping integral sliding mode control of an electromechanical system. J Contr Meas Electron Comput Commun2017; 58(3): 266–272.
10.
ChenLHPengCC. Extended backstepping sliding controller design for chattering attenuation and its application for servo motor control. Appl Sci2017; 7(3): 220.
11.
GallegosJADuarte-MermoudMA. Robust mixed order backstepping control of non-linear systems. IET Control Theory A2018; 12(9): 1276–1285.
12.
YueFLiX. Robust adaptive integral backstepping control for opto-electronic tracking system based on modified LuGre friction model. ISA T2018; 80(9): 312–321.
13.
JiangKNiuBLiJQ, et al. Adaptive neural controller design scheme of nonlinear delayed systems with completely unknown nonlinearities and non-strict-feedback structure. IEEE Access2018; 6: 66418–66427.
14.
MinWLiuQ. An improved adaptive fuzzy backstepping control for nonlinear mechanical systems with mismatched uncertainties. J Contr Meas Electron Comput Commun2019; 60(1): 1–10.
15.
LinCH. A SCRIM drive system using backstepping control and revamped recurrent Romanovski PNN with mended ACO. IETE J Res. Epub ahead of print 29 January 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2019.1565956.
16.
LinFJLinCH. On-line gain-tuning IP controller using RFNN for linear synchronous motor. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2001; 37(2): 655–670.
17.
YaoZYuYYaoJ. Artificial neural network–based internal leakage fault detection for hydraulic actuators: an experimental investigation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 232(4): 369–382.
18.
LiuT. System modeling and instability control of wind turbine blade based on hydraulic pitch system and radial basic function neural network proportional-integral-derivative controller. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2018; 232(10): 1412–1428.
19.
LinDWangXNianF, et al. Dynamic fuzzy neural networks modeling and adaptive backstepping tracking control of uncertain chaotic systems. Neurocomputing2010; 73(16–18): 2873–2881.
20.
LinDWangX. Self-organizing adaptive fuzzy neural control for the synchronization of uncertain chaotic systems with random-varying parameters. Neurocomputing2011; 74(12–13): 2241–2249.
21.
KimHMHanSIKimJS. Precision position control of servo systems using adaptive back-stepping and recurrent fuzzy neural networks. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23(11): 3059–3070.
22.
ShengLGGaoXZhangL. Robust adaptive backstepping sliding mode control for six-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor using recurrent wavelet fuzzy neural network. IEEE Access2017; 5: 14502–14515.
23.
LiberzonD. Switching in systems and control. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media, 2003.
24.
PierreWSKimballJW. Minimum dwell times for the stability of switched systems with multiple stable operating points. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2018 annual American control conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, 27–29 June 2018, vol. 1, pp.3798–3803. New York: IEEE.
25.
SunTZhouDZhuY, et al. Stability, L2-gain analysis, and parity space-based fault detection for discrete-time switched systems under dwell-time switching. IEEE T Syst Man Cy S. Epub ahead of print 10September2018. DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2018.2866876.
26.
RegaiegMAKchaouMEl-HajjajiA, et al. Mode-dependent control design for discrete-time Switched Singular Systems with time varying delay. In: Proceedings of the 2018 annual American control conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, 27–29 June 2018, vol. 1, pp.374–379. New York: IEEE.
27.
NiuBWangDAlotaibiND, et al. Adaptive neural state-feedback tracking control of stochastic nonlinear switched systems: an average dwell-time method. IEEE T Neur Net Lear2019; 30(4): 1076–1087.
28.
HuJLiuDXiaD, et al. Robust stabilization of switched positive discrete-time systems with asynchronous switching and input saturation. Optim Contr Appl Met2019; 40(14): 105–118.
29.
YaoLLiJ. Input-output finite time stabilization of time-varying impulsive positive hybrid systems under MDADT. Appl Sci2017; 7(11): 1187.
30.
ZhengHSunGRenY, et al. Quasi-time-dependent H∞ controller for discrete-time switched linear systems with mode-dependent average dwell-time. Asian J Contr2018; 20(3): 263–275.
31.
LiuLCaoXFuZ, et al. Input-output finite-time control of uncertain positive impulsive switched systems with time-varying and distributed delays. Int J Control Autom2018; 16(4): 670–681.
32.
KennedyJEberhartR. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, WA, 27 November–1 December 1995, pp.1942–1948. New York: IEEE.
33.
ClercMKennedyJ. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE T Evolut Comput2002; 6(1): 58–73.
34.
ShiYEberhartRC. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the 198 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation, Anchorage, AK, 4–9 May 1998, pp.69–73. New York: IEEE.
35.
AkbariRZiaratiK. A rank based particle swarm optimization algorithm with dynamic adaptation. J Comput Appl Math2010; 235(8): 2694–2714.
36.
LinCH. Composite recurrent Laguerre orthogonal polynomials neural network dynamic control for continuously variable transmission system using altered particle swarm optimization. Nonlinear Dynam2015; 81(3): 1219–1245.
37.
MaheswariCPriyankaEBMeenakshipriyaB. Fractional-order PIλDµ controller tuned by coefficient diagram method and particle swarm optimization algorithms for SO2 emission control process. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231(8): 587–599.
38.
LinCHYuCY. Blend recurrent Gegenbauer OPNNAPSO control for a SynRM servo-drive CVT system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference industrial electronics and applications, Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2018, pp.1060–1065. New York: IEEE.
AstromKJWittenmarkB. Adaptive control. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
41.
KuCCLeeKY. Diagonal recurrent neural networks for dynamic system control. IEEE T Neural Netw1995; 6(1): 144–156.
42.
LinCH. Recurrent modified Elman neural network control of PM synchronous generator system using wind turbine emulator of PM synchronous servo motor drive. Int J Electr Power Energ Sys2013; 52: 143–160.
43.
LewisFLCamposJSelmicR. Neuro-fuzzy control of industrial systems with actuator nonlinearities. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 2002.
44.
AstromKJHagglundT. PID controller: theory, design, and tuning. Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrument Society of America, 1995.
45.
HagglundTAstromKJ. Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control. Asian J Contr2002; 4(2): 364–380.
46.
HagglundTAstromKJ. Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control-part II: the frequency response method. Asian J Contr2004; 6(4): 469–482.