Thermal comfort is closely related to the evaluation of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. It can be seen as the result of the perception of the occupants of a given environment, and it is the product of the interaction of a number of personal and environmental factors. Otherwise, comfort issues still do not play an important role in the daily operation of commercial buildings. However, in the workplace, local quality effects, in addition to the health, the productivity that has a significant impact on the performance of the activities. In this regard, researchers have conducted, for decades, investigations related to thermal comfort and indoor environments, which includes developing models and indices through experimentations to establish standards to evaluate comfort and factors and set-up parameters for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. However, to our best knowledge, most of the research work reported in the literature deals only with parameters that are not dynamically tracked. This work aims to propose a prototype for comfort measuring through a wireless sensor network and then presenting a model for thermal comfort prediction. The developed model can be used to set up a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system to meet the expected comfort level. In particular, the obtained results show that there is a strong correlation between users’ comfort and variables such as age, gender, and body mass index as a function of height and weight.
WagnerAGossauerEMoosmannC, et al. Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction: results of field studies in German low energy office buildings. Energy Build2007; 39: 758–769.
2.
OwenMS. 2013 ASHRAE handbook: fundamentals. Inch-Pound ed. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2013.
3.
NicolJFHumphreysMA. Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy Build2002; 34: 563–572.
4.
KhalilNBenhaddouDGnawaliO, et al. Nonintrusive occupant identification by sensing body shape and movement. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international conference on systems for energy-efficient built environments, Palo Alto, CA, 16–17 November 2016, pp.1–10. New York: ACM.
5.
HoughtenFCYaglouCP. Determining lines of equal comfort. ASHVE Trans1923; 29: 163–176.
6.
MacphersonR. The assessment of the thermal environment: a review. Occup Environ Med1962; 19: 151–164.
7.
RorizM. Thermal comfort zone: a comparative study of different approaches. PhD Thesis, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 1987.
8.
LambertsRXavierAA. Thermal comfort and thermal stress. PhD Thesis, Technological Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2011.
9.
FangerPO. Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press, 1970.
10.
ISO 7730:2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
11.
ISO 10551:1995. Ergonomics of the thermal environment: assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales.
12.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55:2010. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy.
13.
FangerPO. Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
14.
HumphreysMA. Field studies of thermal comfort compared and applied. Build Serv Eng1976; 44: 27.
15.
HowellRH. Principles of heating, ventilating and air conditioning: a textbook with design data based on the 2017 ASHRAE handbook fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2017.
16.
NicolFHumphreysMRoafS. Adaptive thermal comfort: principles and practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
17.
AuliciemsADe DearR. Airconditioning in Australia I: human thermal factors. Archit Sci Rev1986; 29: 67–75.
18.
NicolFRoafS. Pioneering new indoor temperature standards: the Pakistan project. Energy Build1996; 23: 169–174.
19.
BS EN 15251:2007. Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics.
20.
PheasantSHaslegraveCM. Bodyspace: anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2018.
21.
LeeSJMotaiYChoiH. Tracking human motion with multichannel interacting multiple model. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2013; 9: 1751–1763.
22.
ZhangJ-TNovakACBrouwerB, et al. Concurrent validation of Xsens MVN measurement of lower limb joint angular kinematics. Physiol Meas2013; 34: N63–N69.
23.
KingmaBFrijnsAvan Marken LichtenbeltW. The thermoneutral zone: implications for metabolic studies. Front Biosci Elite Ed2012; 4: 1975–1985.
24.
FangerPOLangkildeG. Interindividual differences in ambient temperature preferred by seated persons. ASHRAE Trans1975; 81: 140–147.
25.
LangkildeG. Thermal comfort for people of high age. INSERIM1977; 77: 187–194.
26.
CollinsKHoinvilleE. Temperature requirements in old age. Build Serv Eng Res Technol1980; 1: 165–172.
27.
HeyEKatzG. The optimum thermal environment for naked babies. Arch Dis Child1970; 45: 328–334.
28.
KingmaBFrijnsASarisW, et al. Cold-induced vasoconstriction at forearm and hand skin sites: the effect of age. Eur J Appl Physiol2010; 109: 915–921.
29.
IndragantiMRaoKD. Effect of age, gender, economic group and tenure on thermal comfort: a field study in residential buildings in hot and dry climate with seasonal variations. Energy Build2010; 42: 273–281.
30.
De DearRKimJCandidoC, et al. Adaptive thermal comfort in Australian school classrooms. Build Res Inf2015; 43: 383–398.
31.
HwangR-LChenC-P. Field study on behaviors and adaptation of elderly people and their thermal comfort requirements in residential environments. Indoor Air2010; 20: 235–245.
32.
YaglouC. Effective temperature with clothing. ASHVE Trans1925; 31: 89–99.
33.
WebbLHParsonsKC. Thermal comfort requirements for people with physical disabilities, in sustainable buildings. In: Proceedings of the BEPAC and EPSRC mini conference. Oxford, UK, 1997.
34.
ParsonsK. Human thermal environments: The effects of hot, moderate, and cold environments on human health, comfort and performance. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003.
35.
KarjalainenS. Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air2012; 22: 96–109.
TikuisisPJacobsIMorozD, et al. Comparison of thermoregulatory responses between men and women immersed in cold water. J Appl Physiol2000; 89: 1403–1411.
38.
KingmaBvan Marken LichtenbeltW. Energy consumption in buildings and female thermal demand. Nat Clim Change2015; 5: 1054–1056.
39.
HavenithGHolmérIParsonsK. Personal factors in thermal comfort assessment: clothing properties and metabolic heat production. Energy Build2002; 34: 581–591.
40.
KaryonoTH. Report on thermal comfort and building energy studies in Jakarta-Indonesia. Build Environ2000; 35: 77–90.
41.
CannonBNedergaardJ. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev2004; 84: 277–359.
42.
WijersSLSarisWHLichtenbeltWD, et al. Cold-induced adaptive thermogenesis in lean and obese. Obesity2010; 18: 1092–1099.
43.
FadeyiMO. Initial study on the impact of thermal history on building occupants’ thermal assessments in actual air-conditioned office buildings. Build Environ2014; 80: 36–47.
44.
NovietoDTZhangY. Thermal comfort implications of the aging effect on metabolism, cardiac output and body weight. In: Proceedings of the conference on adapting to change: new thinking on comfort Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, 9–11 April 2010, pp.1–9. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
45.
KeithSWReddenDTKatzmarzykPT, et al. Putative contributors to the secular increase in obesity: exploring the roads less traveled. Int J Obes2006; 30: 1585–1094.
46.
McAllisterEJDhurandharNVKeithSW, et al. Ten putative contributors to the obesity epidemic. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr2009; 49: 868–913.
47.
MavrogianniAJohnsonFUcciM, et al. Historic variations in winter indoor domestic temperatures and potential implications for body weight gain. Indoor Built Environ2013; 22: 360–375.
48.
JohnsonFMavrogianniAUcciM, et al. Could increase time spent in a thermal comfort zone contribute to population increases in obesity?Obes Rev2011; 12: 543–551.
49.
SwinburnBASacksGHallKD, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet2011; 378: 804–814.
50.
MerabetGHEssaaidiMBenhaddouD, et al. Measuring human comfort for smart building application: experimental set-up using WSN. In: ICSDE’18 proceedings of the 2nd international conference on smart digital environment, Rabat, Morocco, 18–20 October 2018, pp.56–63. New York: ACM.
51.
AlbadraDVelleiMColeyD, et al. Thermal comfort in desert refugee camps: an interdisciplinary approach. Build Environ2017; 124: 460–477.
52.
BrödePKrügerELRossiFA, et al. Predicting urban outdoor thermal comfort by the universal thermal climate index UTCI: a case study in southern Brazil. Int J Biometeorol2012; 56: 471–480.
