A compensation strategy for plants that suffer from both stiction and saturation in the input is proposed. This strategy exploits a principle established previously by the authors referred to as the “saturation equivalence.” This approach shows that, for systems affected by a certain class of nonlinearities and saturation at the actuator, the addition of a right inverse of the nonlinearity, in series with the plant, results in a saturation. This article shows that a stiction model belongs to this class of nonlinearities and that it can be compensated using the method of “saturation equivalence” by implementing a right inverse for an approximate stiction model. Then, the resulting saturation can be treated by traditional methods, such as anti-windup or model predictive control. Results are demonstrated in a case study plant via simulation.
Fisher Controls. Control valve handbook. 4th ed.Marshalltown, IA: Fisher Controls International LCC, 2005.
2.
JelaliMHuangB. Detection and diagnosis of stiction in control loops: state of the art and advanced methods (Advances in Industrial Control). London: Springer, 2009.
3.
ChoudhuryAThornhillNShahS. Modelling valve stiction. Control Eng Pract2005; 13(5): 641–658.
4.
HägglundT. A friction compensator for pneumatic control valves. J Process Control2002; 12: 897–904.
5.
Di CapaciRBScaliC. Review and comparison of techniques of analysis of valve stiction: from modeling to smart diagnosis. Chem Eng Res Des2018; 130: 230–265.
6.
IvanLLakshminarayananS. A new unified approach to valve stiction quantification and compensation. Ind Eng Chem Res2009; 48(7): 3474–3483.
7.
SrinivasanRRengaswamyR. Approaches for efficient stiction compensation in process control valves. Comput Chem Eng2008; 32: 218–229.
8.
ChenSTanKHuangS. Two-layer binary tree data-driven model for valve stiction. Ind Eng Chem Res2008; 47: 2842–2848.
9.
HeQWangJPottmannMet al. A curve fitting method for detecting valve stiction in oscillating control loops. Ind Eng Chem Res2007; 46: 4549–4560.
10.
KanoMMarutaHKugemotoHet al. Practical model and detection algorithm for valve stiction. In: Proceedings of the 7th IFAC symposium on dynamics and control of process systems, Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, 5–7 July 2004, pp.859–864.
11.
XieLCongYHorchA. An improved valve stiction simulation model based on ISA standard tests. Control Eng Pract2013; 21(10): 1359–1368.
12.
WangJZhangQ. Detection of asymmetric control valve stiction from oscillatory data using an extended Hammerstein system identification method. J Process Control2014; 24(1): 1–12.
13.
Armstrong-HèlouvryBDupontPde WitC. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensation methods for the control of machines with friction. Automatica1994; 30(7): 1083–1138.
14.
FarenzenaMTrierweilerJ. Modified PI controller for stiction compensation. IFAC Proc Vol2010; 43(5): 799–804.
15.
CuadrosMASLMunaroCMunaretoS.Improved stiction compensation in pneumatic control valves. Comput Chem Eng2012; 38(5): 106–114.
16.
WangTXieLTanFet al. A new implementation of open-loop two-move compensation method for oscillations caused by control valve stiction. IFAC-PapersOnLine2015; 48(8): 433–438.
17.
TangLWangJ. Estimation of the most critical parameter for the two-movement method to compensate for oscillations caused by control valve stiction. IEEE T Control Syst Technol2016; 24(5): 1869–1874.
18.
MohammadMAHuangB. Compensation of control valve stiction through controller tuning. J Process Control2012; 22: 1800–1819.
19.
FangLWangJTanXet al. Analysis and compensation of control valve stiction-induced limit cycles. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Banff, AB, 12–15 July 2016, pp.1688–1693. New York: IEEE.
20.
ZabiriHSamyudiaY. MIQP-based MPC in the presence of control valve stiction. Chem Prod Process Model2009; 4(3): 7.
21.
DurandHChristofidesPD. Actuator stiction compensation via model predictive control for nonlinear processes. AIChE J2016; 62(6): 2004–2023.
22.
Di CapaciRBVaccariMPannocchiaG. A valve stiction tolerant formulation of MPC for industrial processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine2017; 50(1): 9044–9049.
23.
NovakJChalupaP. Compensation of valve deadzone using mixed integer predictive control. In: Proceedings of the 31st European conference on modelling and simulation, Budapest, 2017, pp.1–5. Digital Library of the European Council for Modelling and Simulation.
24.
Rodríguez-LiñánMCHeathWP. MPC for plants subject to saturation and deadzone, backlash or stiction. IFAC Proc Vol2012; 45(17): 418–423.
25.
Rodríguez-LiñánMCHeathWP. Controller structure for plants with combined saturation and deadzone/backlash. In: Proceedings of the international conference on control applications, Dubrovnik, 3–5 October 2012, pp.1394–1399. New York: IEEE.
26.
Rodríguez-LiñánMC. New control design and analysis techniques for plants with actuator nonlinearities. PhD Thesis, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, 2013.
27.
Rodríguez-LiñánMCHeathWP. Backlash compensation for plants with saturating actuators. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231(6): 471–480.
28.
TaoGKokotovićP. Adaptive control of systems with actuator and sensor nonlinearities. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA1996.
29.
TarbouriechSTurnerM. Anti-windup design: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. IET Control Theory A2007; 3(1): 1–19.
30.
ZaccarianLTeelAR. Modern anti-windup synthesis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
31.
ChoudhuryAShahSThornhillN. Diagnosis of process nonlinearities and valve stiction (Advances in Industrial Control). 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
32.
JohanssonKHEgerstedtMLygerosJet al. On the regularization of Zeno hybrid automata. Syst Control Lett1999; 38(3): 141–150.
