In a hydraulic system, employment of counterbalance valve introduces sizable energy consumption. In addition, a pressure-feedback control architecture with inflexible parameters causes instability under time-varying negative loads. As an alternative, an adjustable meter-out orifice was adopted, and a stable controller was proposed in this study. By combining inlet pressure and velocity, the concept of a flow rate follower was developed. Mathematical analysis of dynamic model illustrated that both the inlet pressure and velocity converged to a range related to the flow rate follower bounds. Feedback linearization with robust control was utilized such that flow rate follower converged in the presence of parametric uncertainties; meanwhile, a high-gain load observer was constructed for disturbance compensation. The effectiveness of the controller was verified by experiments and its performance discussed. As a result, the inlet pressure was held near a specified low value, thus significantly reducing energy consumption. Also, the velocity matched the supply flow rate, and the oscillations were acceptable in applications.
XuBChengMYangHet al. Safety brake performance evaluation and optimization of hydraulic lifting systems in case of overspeed dropping. Mechatronics2013; 23: 1180–1190.
2.
KjellandMBHansenMR.Offshore wind payload transfer using flexible mobile crane. Model Ident Control2015; 36: 1–9.
3.
NordhammerPABakMKHansenMR.Controlling the slewing motion of hydraulically actuated cranes using sequential activation of counterbalance valves. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on control, automation and systems, Jeju, South Korea, 17–21 October 2012, pp.773–778. New York: IEEE.
4.
RitelliGFVaccaA.Energetic and dynamic impact of counterbalance valves in fluid power machines. Energ Convers Manage2013; 76: 701–711.
5.
StawińskiŁ. Experimental and modeling studies of hydrostatic systems with the counterbalance valves which are used in hydraulic lifting systems with passive and active load. Eksploat Niezawodn2016; 18: 406–412.
6.
ZhaoLLiuXWangT. Influence of counterbalance valve parameters on stability of the crane lifting system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on mechatronics and automation, Xi’an, China, 4–7 August 2010, pp.1010–1014. New York: IEEE.
7.
SørensenJKHansenMREbbesenMK.Novel concept for stabilising a hydraulic circuit containing counterbalance valve and pressure compensated flow supply. Int J Fluid Power2016; 17: 153–162.
8.
LiuJXieHHuLet al. Realization of direct flow control with load pressure compensation on a load control valve applied in overrunning load hydraulic systems. Flow Meas Instrum2017; 53: 261–268.
9.
ErikssonBPalmbergJ.Individual metering fluid power systems: challenges and opportunities. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2011; 225: 196–211.
10.
LeeJ-CJinK-CKwonY-Met al. Development of the independent metering valve control system and analysis of its performance for an excavator. In: Proceedings of the ASME/BATH symposium on fluid power and motion control, Bath, 7–9 September 2016, p.V001T01A021. New York: ASME.
11.
KoivumäkiJMattilaJ. Stable and high performance energy-efficient motion control of electric load sensing controlled hydraulic manipulators. In: Proceedings of the ASME/BATH symposium on fluid power and motion control, Sarasota, FL, 6–9 October 2013, p.V001T01A024. New York: ASME.
12.
LiuBQuanLGeL.Research on the performance of hydraulic excavator boom based pressure and flow accordance control with independent metering circuit. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2017; 231: 901–913.
13.
ParkHGNahianSAAnhKK.A study on energy saving of IMV circuit using pressure feedback. J Drive Control2016; 13: 31–44.
14.
ChoiKSeoJNamYet al. Energy-saving in excavators with application of independent metering valve. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 387–395.
15.
NielsenB.Controller development for a separate meter-in separate meter-out fluid power valve for mobile applications. PhD Thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, 2005.
16.
DingRXuBZhangJet al. Bumpless mode switch of independent metering fluid power system for mobile machinery. Automat Constr2016; 68: 52–64.
17.
ShenoudaABookW.Optimal mode switching for a hydraulic actuator controlled with four-valve independent metering configuration. Int J Fluid Power2008; 9: 35–43.
18.
SitteAWeberJ. Structural design of independent metering control systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th Scandinavian international conference on fluid power, Linkoping, 3–5 June 2013, pp.261–270. Linkoping: Linkoping University Electronic Press.
19.
PedersenHCAndersenTOSkouboeTet al. Investigation and comparison of separate meter-in separate meter-out control strategies. In: Proceedings of the ASME/BATH symposium on fluid power and motion control, Sarasota, FL, 6–9 October 2013, p.V001T01A047. New York: ASME.
20.
DingRXuBZhangJet al. Self-tuning pressure-feedback control by pole placement for vibration reduction of excavator with independent metering fluid power system. Mech Syst Signal Pr2017; 92: 86–106.
21.
YaoBDeBoerC. Energy-saving adaptive robust motion control of single-rod hydraulic cylinders with programmable valves. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, Anchorage, AK, 8–10 May 2002, pp.4819–4824. New York: IEEE.
22.
LiuSYaoB.Coordinate control of energy saving programmable valves. IEEE T Contr Syst T2008; 16: 34–45.
23.
XuBDingRZhangJet al. Pump/valves coordinate control of the independent metering system for mobile machinery. Automat Constr2015; 57: 98–111.
24.
VukovicMMurrenhoffH. Single edge meter out control for mobile machinery. In: ASME/BATH symposium on fluid power and motion control, Bath, 10–12 September 2014, p.V001T01A009. New York: ASME.
25.
XuZMaDYaoJet al. Feedback nonlinear robust control for hydraulic system with disturbance compensation. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2016; 230: 978–987.
26.
GuoKWeiJFangJet al. Position tracking control of electro-hydraulic single-rod actuator based on an extended disturbance observer. Mechatronics2015; 27: 47–56.
27.
KochSReichhartingerM.Observer-based sliding mode control of hydraulic cylinders in the presence of unknown load forces. E I: Elektrotech Inform2016; 133: 253–260.
28.
YangHFengBGongG.Measurement of effective fluid bulk modulus in hydraulic system. J Dyn Syst: T ASME2011; 133: 61021.
29.
KimSMurrenhoffH.Measurement of effective bulk modulus for hydraulic oil at low pressure. J Fluid Eng: T ASME2012; 134: 21201.
30.
KhalilHK.Nonlinear systems. 3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
31.
GoodwinGCGraebeSFSalgadoME.Control system design. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001, p.485.
32.
LiuKGaoYTuZet al. Energy-saving analysis of the independent metering system with pressure compensation for excavator’s manipulator. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2016; 230: 905–920.
