Actuator configuration and optimization play a vital role in active control of vibration. This article formulates an actuator position optimization strategy for active control system of solar panel using the solid propellant microthruster arrays. In order to reduce the control spillover effect and improve the control quality, an optimal placement method based on optimization criterion and a novel adaptive cuckoo search named dynamic adaptive evaluation cuckoo search is proposed. The optimization criterion is designed with the consideration of desired control performance and efficiency of each contributed and undesired mode; thus, the control force applied to solar panel is mostly utilized by the desired modes. In optimization procedure, the finite element model is used to analyze the configuration problems of the actuators, which can be converted into the constraints of decision in integer programming, and then, the dynamic adaptive evaluation cuckoo search can be used to optimize the solution. Finally, simulation results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of optimization criterion, and the statistical analyses for comparisons demonstrate competitive performance of dynamic adaptive evaluation cuckoo search with respect to recent algorithms for solving placement problems.
SongGAgrawalBN.Vibration suppression of flexible spacecraft during attitude control. Acta Astronaut2001; 49: 73–83.
2.
Di GennaroS. Active vibration suppression in flexible spacecraft attitude tracking. J Guid Control Dynam1998; 21: 400–408.
3.
LiSQiuJJiHet al. Piezoelectric vibration control for all-clamped panel using DOB-based optimal control. Mechatronics2011; 21: 1213–1221.
4.
Rodriguez-FortunJMOrusJAlfonsoJet al. Flatness-based active vibration control for piezoelectric actuators. IEEE/ASME T Mech2013; 18: 221–229.
5.
ZhangTLiHGCaiGP.Hysteresis identification and adaptive vibration control for a smart cantilever beam by a piezoelectric actuator. Sensor Actuat A: Phys2013; 203: 168–175.
6.
LiSLiJMoY.Piezoelectric multimode vibration control for stiffened plate using ADRC-based acceleration compensation. IEEE T Ind Electron2014; 61: 6892–6902.
7.
HasheminejadSMVahediMMarkaziAHD. Multi-objective robust active vibration control of an arbitrary thick piezolaminated beam. Mech Adv Mater Struc2015; 22: 908–924.
8.
CasellaFLocatelliASchiavoniN.Modeling and control for vibration suppression in a large flexible structure with jet thrusters and piezoactuators. IEEE T Contr Syst T2002; 10: 589–599.
9.
KarpelsonMWeiGYWoodRJ.Driving high voltage piezoelectric actuators in microrobotic applications. Sensor Actuat A: Phys2012; 176: 78–89.
10.
LewisDHJansonSWCohenRBet al. Digital micropropulsion. Sensor Actuat A: Phys2000; 80: 143–154.
11.
RossiCOrieuxSLarangotBet al. Design, fabrication and modeling of solid propellant microrocket-application to micropropulsion. Sensor Actuat A: Phys2002; 99: 125–133.
12.
ChaalaneALarangotBRossiCet al. Main directions of solid propellant micro-propulsion activity at LAAS. In: Proceedings of the CANEUS 2004 conference on micro-nano-technologies, Monterey, CA, 1–5 November 2004, pp.1–8. Reston, VA: AIAA.
13.
ChouSKYangWMChuaKJet al. Development of micro power generators—a review. Appl Energ2011; 88: 1–16.
14.
YoungnerDWLuSTChoueiriEet al. MEMS mega-pixel micro-thruster arrays for small satellite stationkeeping. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on small satellites, Logan, UT, 21–24 August 2000, pp.1–8. AIAA.
15.
LiuXLiTLiZet al. Design, fabrication and test of a solid propellant microthruster array by conventional precision machining. Sensor Actuat A: Phys2015; 236: 214–227.
16.
GuptaVSharmaMThakurN.Optimization criteria for optimal placement of piezoelectric sensors and actuators on a smart structure: a technical review. J Intel Mat Syst Str2010; 21: 1227–1243.
17.
LiYWangXHuangRet al. Actuator placement robust optimization for vibration control system with interval parameters. Aerosp Sci Technol2015; 45: 88–98.
18.
NestorovićTTrajkovM.Optimal actuator and sensor placement based on balanced reduced models. Mech Syst Signal Pr2013; 36: 271–289.
19.
BruantIProslierL.Optimal location of actuators and sensors in active vibration control. J Intel Mat Syst Str2005; 16: 197–206.
20.
BruantIGallimardLNikoukarS.Optimal piezoelectric actuator and sensor location for active vibration control, using genetic algorithm. J Sound Vib2010; 329: 1615–1635.
21.
Ramesh KumarKNarayananS. Active vibration control of beams with optimal placement of piezoelectric sensor/actuator pairs. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17: 55008.
22.
SohnJWChoiSBKimHS.Vibration control of smart hull structure with optimally placed piezoelectric composite actuators. Int J Mech Sci2011; 53: 647–659.
23.
BiglarMMirdamadiHRDaneshM.Optimal locations and orientations of piezoelectric transducers on cylindrical shell based on gramians of contributed and undesired Rayleigh–Ritz modes using genetic algorithm. J Sound Vib2014; 333: 1224–1244.
24.
VashistSKChhabraD.Optimal placement of piezoelectric actuators on plate structures for active vibration control using genetic algorithm. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mech Eng2013; 7: 165–170.
25.
Simões MoitaJMFranco CorreiaVMMartinsPGet al. Optimal design in vibration control of adaptive structures using a simulated annealing algorithm. Compos Struct2006; 75: 79–87.
26.
WangTXBoYMWangXMet al. Optimal actuator and sensor locations for active vibration control: using improved particle swarm algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 2013 4th world congress on software engineering (WCSE), Hong Kong, China, 3–4 December 2013, vol. 1, pp.288–292. New York: IEEE.
27.
MoghaddamJJBagheriA.A novel stable deviation quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization to optimal piezoelectric actuator and sensor location for active vibration control. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2015; 229: 485–494.
28.
LeleuSAbou-KandilHBonnassieuxY.Piezoelectric actuators and sensors location for active control of flexible structures. IEEE T Instrum Meas2001; 50: 1577–1582.
29.
YangX-SDebS.Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In: Proceedings of the world congress on nature and biologically inspired computing, Coimbatore, India, 9–11 December 2009, pp.210–214. New York: IEEE.
30.
YildizAR.Cuckoo search algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2013; 64: 55–61.
31.
AfzalanEJoorabianM.An improved cuckoo search algorithm for power economic load dispatch. Int T Electr Energy2015; 25: 958–975.
32.
CiviciogluPBesdokE.A conceptual comparison of the Cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution and artificial bee colony algorithms. Artif Intell Rev2013; 39: 315–346.
33.
GandomiAHYangXSAlaviAH.Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput2013; 29: 17–35.
34.
ZhaoHHJiangYMWangTet al. A method based on the adaptive cuckoo search algorithm for endmember extraction from hyperspectral remote sensing images. Remote Sens Lett2016; 7: 289–297.
35.
MohantyPKParhiDR.Optimal path planning for a mobile robot using cuckoo search algorithm. J Exp Theor Artif In2016; 28: 35–52.
36.
ValianETavakoliSMohannaSet al. Improved cuckoo search for reliability optimization problems. Comput Ind Eng2013; 64: 459–468.
37.
SekharPMohantyS.An enhanced cuckoo search algorithm based contingency constrained economic load dispatch for security enhancement. Int J Elec Power2016; 75: 303–310.
38.
TeymourianEKayvanfarVKomakiGMet al. Enhanced intelligent water drops and cuckoo search algorithms for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Inform Sciences2016; 334–335: 354–378.
39.
LayebA.A novel quantum inspired cuckoo search for knapsack problems. Int J Bio-Inspir Com2011; 3: 297–305.
40.
WangJZhouB.A hybrid adaptive cuckoo search optimization algorithm for the problem of chaotic systems parameter estimation. Neural Comput Appl2016; 27: 1511–1517.
41.
KanagarajGPonnambalamSGJawaharN.A hybrid cuckoo search and genetic algorithm for reliability–redundancy allocation problems. Comput Ind Eng2013; 66: 1115–1124.
42.
BalasMJ.Trends in large space structure control theory: fondest hopes, wildest dreams. IEEE T Automat Contr1982; 27: 522–535.
43.
PreumontA.Vibration control of active structures: an introduction. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, p.199.
44.
LinJG. Three steps to alleviate control and observation spillover problems of large space structures. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE conference on decision and control including the symposium on adaptive processes, Albuquerque, NM, 10–12 December 1980, vol. 19, pp.438–444. New York: IEEE.
LuYDongCWangQ.Control allocation for aircraft with input constraints based on improved cuckoo search algorithm. Defence Technol2017; 13: 1–5.
51.
LiX-TTYinM-HH. Parameter estimation for chaotic systems using the cuckoo search algorithm with an orthogonal learning method. Chinese Phys B2012; 21: 50507.
52.
SiLWangZLiuZet al. Health condition evaluation for a shearer through the integration of a fuzzy neural network and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl Sci2016; 6: 171.
53.
PantMThangarajRAbrahamA. Anew quantum behaved particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, Atlanta, GA, 12–16 July 2008, pp.87–94. New York: ACM.
