In this article, a gain-scheduling control is designed to achieve the stabilization of a riderless bicycle. The main contribution is the design of a stabilizing control system including integral actions based on an observer and its corroboration through experimental results, with the objective of the stabilization of a riderless bicycle toward its upright position through a torque applied to the handlebar. The bicycle stabilization is achieved even when the translational velocity is varying over time, parameter considered as scheduling variable. The stabilizing system is based on a linear quadratic regulator gain-scheduling control, concluding with the effective application of this scheme on an instrumented prototype.
RughWJShammaJS.Research on gain scheduling. Automatica2000; 36(10): 1401–1425.
2.
SatoMPeaucelleD.Gain-scheduled output-feedback controllers using inexact scheduling parameters for continuous-time LPV systems. Automatica2013; 49(4): 1019–1025.
3.
SatoM.Gain scheduled state feedback controllers for discrete-time LPV systems using scheduling parameters affected by absolute and proportional uncertainties. IFAC PapersOnline2015; 48(26): 31–36.
4.
BaliniHMNKWitteJSchererCW.Synthesis and implementation of gain-scheduling and LPV controllers for an AMB system. Automatica2012; 48(3): 521–527.
5.
HanYPanW.Gain-scheduled continuous higher-order sliding mode control for uncertain nonlinear system. Optik2016; 127(10): 4345–4354.
6.
BedoudKAli-rachedicMBahiTet al. Adaptive fuzzy gain scheduling of PI controller for control of the Wind Energy conversion systems. Enrgy Proced2015; 74: 211–225.
7.
DounisAIKofinasPAlafodimosCet al. Adaptive fuzzy gain scheduling PID controller for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic system. Renew Energ2013; 60: 202–214.
8.
FernandesLSLMoraes FilhoFCPauloJBAet al. Gain scheduling adaptive control applied to a particular mixer-settler equipment. Control Eng Pract2013; 21(8): 1121–1127.
9.
MoutinhoAAzinheiraJRde PaivaECet al. Airship robust path-tracking: a tutorial on airship modelling and gain-scheduling control design. Control Eng Pract2016; 50: 22–36.
10.
ChenCCChenCLChangJXet al. LPV Gain-scheduling control for a phase-shifted PWM full-bridge soft switched converter. In: Proceedings of the 19th IFAC world congress, Cape Town, South Africa, 24–29 August 2014, vol. 47, no. 3, pp.6135–6140. New York: IFAC.
11.
PrempainEPostlethwaiteI.A new two-degree-of-freedom gain scheduling method applied to the Lynx MK7. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2000; 214(4): 299–311.
12.
ChangYHLinHWHuYHet al. Fuzzy-scheduling control of a linear permanent magnet synchronous motor with payload variations. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2008; 222(6): 465–479.
13.
MendesMDuarteGBaptistaP.Introducing specific power to bicycles and motorcycles: application to electric mobility. Transport Res C: Emer2015; 51: 120–135.
14.
BakerSACalhounVD.A custom bicycle handlebar adaptation for children with below elbow amputations. J Hand Ther2014; 27(3): 258–260.
15.
RomanMRomanM.Bicycle transport as an opportunity to develop urban tourism – Warsaw example. Proced Soc Behav Sci2014; 151: 295–301.
16.
AbagnaleCCardoneMIodicePet al. Model-based control for an innovative power-assisted bicycle. Enrgy Proced2015; 81: 606–617.
17.
YavinY.Modelling and control of the motion of a riderless bicycle rolling on a moving plane. Comput Math Appl2007; 54(11–12): 1319–1328.
18.
YavinY.The derivation of a kinematic model from the dynamic model of the motion of a riderless bicycle. Comput Math Appl2006; 51(6–7): 865–878.
19.
YavinY.Stabilization and control of the motion of an autonomous bicycle by using a rotor for the tilting moment. Comput Method Appl M1999; 178(3–4): 233–243.
ShafiekhaniAMahjoobMJAkraminiaM.Design and implementation of an adaptive critic-based neuro-fuzzy controller on an unmanned bicycle. Mechatronics2015; 28: 115–123.
22.
EdelmannJHaudumMPlöchlM.Bicycle rider control modelling for path tracking. IFAC PapersOnline2015; 48(1): 55–60.
23.
ZhangYWangPYiJet al. Stationary balance control of a bikebot. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, 31 May–7 June 2014, pp.6706–6711. New York: IEEE.
24.
DefoortMMurakamiT.Sliding-mode control scheme for an intelligent bicycle. IEEE T Ind Electron2009; 56(9): 3357–3368.
25.
YiJSongDLevandowskiAet al. Trajectory tracking and balance stabilization control of autonomous motorcycles. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Orlando, FL, 15–19 May 2006, pp.2583–2589. New York: IEEE.
26.
Brizuela-MendozaJAAstorga-ZaragozaCMZavala-RíoAet al. State and actuator fault estimation observer design integrated in a riderless bicycle stabilization system. ISA T2016; 61: 199–210.
27.
Brizuela-MendozaJAAstorga-ZaragozaCMZavala-RíoAet al. Fault tolerant control for polynomial linear parameter varying (LPV) systems applied to the stabilization of a riderless bicycle. In: Proceedings of the 2013 European control conference (ECC), Zürich, 17–19 July 2013, pp.2957–2962. New York: IEEE.
28.
Brizuela-MendozaJAAstorga-ZaragozaCMZavala-RoAet al. Active Fault Tolerant Control: Sensor fault estimation and accommodation applied to a riderless bicycle LPV modelRev Iberoam Autom Inf Ind2016; 13(2): 174–185.
29.
BriatC.Commande et Observation Robustes des Systèmes LPV Retardès. PhD Thesis, Grenoble INP, 2008.
30.
MeijaardJPPapadopoulosJMRuinaAet al. Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review. P Roy Soc A: Math Phy2007; 463(2084): 1955–1982.
31.
SchwabALMeijaardJPPapadopoulosJM.Benchmark results on the linearized equations of motion of an uncontrolled bicycle. J Mech Sci Technol2005; 19(1): 292–304.
32.
CeroneVAndreoDLarssonMet al. Stabilization of a riderless bicycle: a linear–parameter-varying approach. IEEE Contr Syst Mag2010; 30(5): 23–32.
33.
AndreoDCeroneVDzungDet al. Experimental results on LPV stabilization of a riderless bicycle. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, St. Louis, MO, 10–12 June 2009, pp.3124–3129. New York: IEEE.
34.
ChilaliMGahinetPApkarianP.Robust pole placement in LMI regions. IEEE T Automat Contr1999; 44(12): 2257–2270.
35.
LöfbergJ. YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE international symposium on computer aided control systems design (CACSD), Taipei, Taiwan, 2–4 September 2004, pp.284–289. New York: IEEE.
