Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Charge control for a piezoelectric actuator is supposedly unaffected by the hysteresis effect; however, the voltage applied to the actuator covers both the effective force-generating voltage and the hysteresis voltage. In this article, this hysteresis nonlinearity is considered an extra disturbance over a linear system. A novel approach entailing the use of the parasitic capacitance charge feedback in conjunction with a Preisach model to estimate the hysteresis disturbance is proposed. The estimated extra voltage enables the controller to augment its effort with an additional term to compensate for this loss. The article also describes the establishment of an adequate Preisach model. The proposed approach applies a low-pass filter and feedforward compensator to improve the tracking performance. Control results under sinusoidal reference and staircase reference tracking confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed compensation in eliminating the hysteresis effect and achieving high-precision control.

Keywords

Piezoelectric actuators charge feedback disturbance observer Preisach model precision motion control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Newcomb

Flinn

. Improving the linearity of piezoelectric ceramic actuators. Electron Lett 1982; 18: 442–444.

Comstock

. Charge control of piezoelectric actuators to reduce hysteresis effects. US 4263527A Patent, 1981.

Goldfarb

Celanovic

. Modeling piezoelectric stack actuators for control of micromanipulation. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 1997; 17: 69–79.

Adriaens

de Koning

Banning

. Modeling piezoelectric actuators. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2000; 5: 331–341.

Devasia

Eleftheriou

Moheimani

SOR

. A survey of control issues in nanopositioning. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2007; 15: 802–823.

Jalili

. Piezoelectric-based vibration control: from macro to micro/nano scale systems. New York: Springer, 2010, pp.1–517.

Kaizuka

Siu

. A simple way to reduce hysteresis and creep when using piezoelectric actuators. Jpn J Appl Phys 2 1988; 27: L773–L776.

Tonoli

Oliva

Carabelli

. Charge-driven piezoelectric transducers in self-sensing configuration. In: Proceedings of SPIE—the international society for optical engineering, Newport Beach, CA, 16 August 2001, pp.743–752. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

Fleming

Moheimani

SOR

. A grounded-load charge amplifier for reducing hysteresis in piezoelectric tube scanners. Rev Sci Instrum 2005; 76: 073707.

10.

Veillette

. A charge controller for linear operation of a piezoelectric stack actuator. IEEE T Contr Syst T 2005; 13: 517–526.

11.

Amin-Shahidi

Trumper

. Improved charge amplifier using hybrid hysteresis compensation. Rev Sci Instrum 2013; 84: 085115.

12.

Rios

Fleming

. Design of a charge drive for reducing hysteresis in a piezoelectric bimorph actuator. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2016; 21: 51–54.

13.

Bazghaleh

Grainger

Cazzolato

. Implementation and analysis of an innovative digital charge amplifier for hysteresis reduction in piezoelectric stack actuators. Rev Sci Instrum 2014; 85: 045005.

14.

Islam

Seethaler

. Sensorless position control for piezoelectric actuators using a hybrid position observer. IEEE-ASME T Mech 2014; 19: 667–675.

15.

Chen

Yen

Chen

JJH

. Precision tracking of a piezo-driven stage by charge feedback control. Precis Eng 2013; 37: 793–804.

16.

Hassani

Tjahjowidodo

. A survey on hysteresis modeling, identification and control. Mech Syst Signal Pr 2014; 49: 209–233.

17.

. Dahl model-based hysteresis compensation and precise positioning control of an XY parallel micromanipulator with piezoelectric actuation. J Dyn Syst: T ASME 2010; 132: 1–12.

18.

Lin

. Tracking control of a biaxial piezo-actuated positioning stage using generalized Duhem model. Comput Math Appl 2012; 64: 766–787.

19.

Preisach

. About the magnetic aftereffect. Z Phys 1935; 94: 277–302.

20.

Song

. Modeling of piezo actuator’s nonlinear and frequency dependent dynamics. Mechatronics 1999; 9: 391–410.

21.

Tsai

H-F

Yen

J-Y

Chen

L-S

. Frequency domain effect of a hysteresis suppression system with inverse Preisach model based control. Int J Autom Smart Technol 2015; 5(4): 265–273.

Compensation of the residual error from the charge feedback control of a piezoelectric-actuated stage

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References