This work addresses the problem of oscillatory failure case detection in the electrical flight control system of a generic commercial airplane. A non-homogeneous differentiator is first used to provide accurate derivatives in noisy environment and fast convergence time. In this study case, fault detection is addressed in the unknown input estimation issue for fault reconstruction with the same evaluation techniques currently employed in Airbus A380 airplanes. Based on the non-homogeneous differentiator theory, an algorithm for differentiator tuning is provided to manage a trade-off between the accuracy of fault reconstruction and the convergence time that is compliant with specified detection time requirements. Performance and robustness of the developed monitoring strategy are assessed using a high-fidelity Airbus benchmark and a parametric test campaign for the flight scenarios defined in the EU-FP7 ADDSAFE project.
GoupilP. Oscillatory failure case detection in the A380 electrical flight control system by analytical redundancy. Control Eng Pract2010; 18(9): 1110–1119.
2.
BeschHMGiesselerHGSchullerJ. Impact of electronic flight control system (EFCS) failure cases on structural design loads (Agard report 815). AGARD, 1996.
3.
GoupilPMarcosA. Advanced diagnosis for sustainable flight guidance and control: the European ADDSAFE project. In: Proceedings of the SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition, Toulouse, 18–21 October 2011.
4.
HwangIKimSKimY. A survey of fault detection, isolation, and reconfiguration methods. IEEE T Contr Syst T2010; 18(3): 636–653.
5.
ZolghadriAHenryDCieslakJ. Fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control and guidance for aerospace vehicles: from theory to application. London: Springer, 2014.
6.
BerdjagDCieslakJZolghadriA. Fault diagnosis and monitoring of oscillatory failure case in aircraft inertial system. Contr Eng Pract2012; 20(12): 1410–1425.
7.
HouM. Estimation of sinusoidal frequencies and amplitudes using adaptive identifier and observer. IEEE T Automat Contr2007; 52(3): 493–499.
8.
Alcorta GarciaEZolghadriAGoupilP. A nonlinear observer-based strategy for aircraft oscillatory failure detection: A380 case study. IEEE T Aero Elec Sys2011; 47(4): 2792–2806.
9.
EfimovDCieslakJZolghadriA. Actuator fault detection in aircraft systems: oscillatory failure case study. Annu Rev Control2013; 37(1): 180–190.
10.
SachsH. Fault investigation and robust failure detection of oscillating aircraft actuation systems using analytical redundancy. Aachen: Shaker Verlag GmbH, 2010.
11.
MeskinNKhorasaniKRabbathCA. A hybrid fault detection and isolation strategy for a network of unmanned vehicles in presence of large environmental disturbances. IEEE T Contr Syst T2010; 18(6): 1422–1429.
12.
FridmanLShtesselYEdwardsC. Higher-order sliding-mode observer for state estimation and input reconstruction in nonlinear systems. Int J Robust Nonlin2008; 18(4–5): 399–413.
13.
SaifMXiongY. Sliding mode observers and their application in fault diagnosis. In CaccavaleFVillaniL (eds) Fault diagnosis and fault tolerance for mechatronic systems: recent advances. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2003, pp.1–57.
14.
GohKBSpurgeonSKJonesNB. Higher-order sliding mode control of a diesel generator set. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2003; 217(3): 229–241.
15.
ShtesselYHallCBaevS. Flexible modes control using sliding mode observers: application to Ares I. In: Proceedings of the conference on guidance, navigation and control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2–4 August 2010. Reston, VA: AIAA.
16.
GonzalezTMorenoJFridmanL. Variable gain super-twisting sliding mode control. IEEE T Automat Contr2012; 57(8): 2100–2105.
17.
SunHLiSSunC. Robust adaptive integral-sliding-mode fault-tolerant control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2012; 226(10): 1344–1355.
18.
KimBSHanSILeeJM. Adaptive fuzzy output feedback dynamic surface sliding mode control for a nonlinear dynamic system. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2013; 227(2): 214–229.
19.
AlwiHEdwardsC. An adaptive sliding mode differentiator for actuator oscillatory failure case reconstruction. Automatica2013; 49(2): 642–651.
20.
LevantA. Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control. Int J Control2003; 76(9–10): 924–941.
EfimovDFridmanL. A hybrid robust non-homogeneous finite-time differentiator. IEEE T Automat Contr2011; 56(5): 1213–1219.
23.
GoupilPMarcosA. The European ADDSAFE project: industrial and academic efforts towards advanced fault diagnosis. Control Eng Pract2014; 31: 109–125.
24.
HenryDCieslakJZolghadriA. H∞/H− LPV solutions for fault detection of aircraft actuator faults: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Int J Robust Nonlin. Epub ahead of print 16March2014. DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3157.
25.
KolmogoroffAN. On inequalities between upper bounds of consecutive derivatives of an arbitrary function defined on an infinite interval. Am Math Soc Transl1962; 2: 233–242.
EfimovDZolghadriARaïssiT. Actuators fault detection and compensation under feedback control. Automatica2011; 47(8): 1699–1705.
28.
FernandezVDe ZaiacomoGMafficiniA. The IXV GNC Functional Engineering Simulator. In: Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on simulation and EGSE facilities for space programmes (ESA-ESTEC), Noordwijk, 28–30 September 2010.
29.
ZolghadriA. Advanced model-based FDIR techniques for aerospace systems: Today challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci2012; 53: 18–29.
