We numerically investigate the sense in which an adaptive control law achieves internal model control of Hammerstein plants with Prandtl–Ishlinskii hysteresis. We apply retrospective cost adaptive control to a command-following problem for uncertain Hammerstein systems with hysteretic input nonlinearities. The only required modeling information of the linear plant is a single Markov parameter. Describing functions are used to determine whether the adaptive controller inverts the plant at the exogenous frequencies.
TaoGKokotovićP. Adaptive control of systems with actuator and sensor nonlinearities. New York: Wiley, 1996.
2.
KrejciPAl JanaidehMDeasyF. Inversion of hysteresis and creep operators. Physica B2012; 407(8): 1354–1356.
3.
VisoneCSjöströmM. Exact invertible hysteresis models based on play operators. Physica B2004; 343(1): 148–152.
4.
KuhnenK. Modeling, identification and compensation of complex hysteretic nonlinearities: a modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach. Eur J Control2003; 9(4): 407–418.
5.
EsbrookATanXKhalilH. Control of systems with hysteresis via servocompensation and its application to nanopositioning. IEEE T Contr Syst T2013; 21(3): 725–738.
6.
EsbrookATanXKhalilH. Inversion-free stabilization and regulation of systems with hysteresis via integral action. Automatica2014; 50(4): 1017–1025.
7.
AljanaidehOAl JanaidehMRakotondrabeM. Enhancement of micro-positioning accuracy of a piezoelectric positioner by suppressing the rate-dependant hysteresis nonlinearities. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Besançon, 8–11 July 2014, pp.1683–1688. New York: IEEE.
8.
XuQLiY. Dahl model-based hysteresis compensation and precise positioning control of an XY parallel micromanipulator with piezoelectric actuation. J Dyn Syst: T ASME2010; 132(4): 041011-1–041011-12.
9.
GorbetRMorrisKWangD. Passivity-based stability and control of hysteresis in smart actuators. IEEE T Contr Syst T2001; 9(1): 5–16.
10.
Cruz-HernandezJHaywardV. Phase control approach to hysteresis reduction. IEEE T Contr Syst T2001; 9(1): 17–26.
11.
Al JanaidehMNaldiRMarconiL. A hybrid system for a class of hysteresis nonlinearity: modeling and compensation. In: Proceedings of decision and control conference, Maui, HI, 10–13 December 2012, pp. 5380–5385. New York: IEEE.
12.
JayawardhanaBLogemannHRyanEP. PID control of second-order systems with hysteresis. Int J Control2008; 81(8): 1331–1342.
13.
RiccardiLNasoDTurchianoB. Design of linear feedback controllers for dynamic systems with hysteresis. IEEE T Contr Syst T2014; 22: 1268–1280.
14.
FrancisBWonhamW. The internal model principle of control theory. J Appl Math Optim1975; 12(5): 170–194.
15.
Al JanaidehMKrejciP. Inverse rate-dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii model for feedforward compensation of hysteresis in a piezomicropositioning actuator. IEEE/ASME T Mech2013; 18(5): 1498–1507.
16.
WonhamW. Linear multivariable control: a geometric approach. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1979.
17.
DavisonEJ. The robust control of a servomechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable systems. IEEE T Automat Contr1976; 21(1): 25–34.
18.
AstromKJHagglundT. Advanced PID control. Research Triangle Park, NC: The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, 2006.
19.
YanJD’AmatoAMSumerD. Adaptive control of uncertain Hammerstein systems using auxiliary nonlinearities. In: Proceedings of decision and control conference, Maui, HI, 10–13 December 2012, pp.4811–4816. New York: IEEE.
20.
Al JanaidehMBernsteinDS. Inversion-free adaptive control of uncertain systems with shape-memory-alloy actuation. In: Proceedings of American control conference, Washington, DC, 17–19 June 2013, pp. 3585–3590. New York: IEEE.
21.
Al JanaidehMYanJD’AmatoAM. Retrospective-cost adaptive control of uncertain Hammerstein-Wiener systems with memoryless and hysteretic nonlinearities. In: AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference, Minneapolis, MN, 13–16 August 2012, paper no. AIAA-2012-4449-671. Reston, VA: AIAA.
22.
VenugopalRBernsteinDS. Adaptive disturbance rejection using ARMARKOV system representations. IEEE T Contr Syst T2000; 8(2): 257–269.
23.
HoaggJBSantilloMABernsteinDS. Discrete-time adaptive command following and disturbance rejection for minimum-phase systems with unknown exogenous dynamics. IEEE T Automat Contr2008; 53(4): 912–928.
24.
SantilloMABernsteinDS. Adaptive control based on retrospective cost optimization. J Guid Contr Dynam2010; 33(2): 289–304.
25.
FledderjohnMHolzelMPalanthandalam-MadapusiH. A comparison of least squares algorithms for estimating Markov parameters. In: Proceedings of American control conference, Baltimore, MD, 30 June–2 July 2010, pp. 3735–3740. New York: IEEE.
ShanYLeangK. Design and control for high-speed nanopositioning: serial-kinematic nanopositioners and repetitive control for nanofabrication. IEEE Contr Syst Mag2013; 33(6): 86–105.
