A strong case was made by Edwards and Potter (1993) that discourse analysis is superior to alternative approaches to language analysis. In the present article we apply four models of language analysis to Edwards and Potter's paper, including our Linguistic Category Model (LCM) and their Discursive Action Model (DAM), with converging results. It is concluded that a complex phenomenon like real language in social context does not necessarily need models and methods approaching the same level of complexity. A more parsimonious model can be even better suited to the task.
Arcuri, L. , Maass, A., & Portelli, G. (1993). Linguistic intergroup bias and implicit attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 277-285.
2.
Brown, R. , & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237-273.
3.
Edwards, D. , & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
4.
Edwards, D. , & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A Discursive Action Model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23-41.
5.
Fiedler, K. (1989). Suggestion and credibility: Lie detection based on content-related cues. In V.A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H.J. Eysenck, & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility: Theory and research (pp. 323-335). Berlin: Springer.
6.
Fiedler, K. , & Semin, G.R. (1988). On the causal information conveyed by different interpersonal verbs: The role of implicit sentence context. Social Cognition, 6, 21-39.
7.
Fiedler, K. , & Semin, G.R. (1992). Attribution and language as a socio-cognitive environment. In G.R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 79-101). London: Sage.
8.
Fiedler, K. , Semin, G.R., & Bolten, S. (1989). Language use and reification of social information: Top-down and bottom-up processing in person cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 271-295.
9.
Fiedler, K. , Semin, G.R., & Finkenauer, C. (1993a). Welchen Spielraum läβt die Sprache für die Attribution? In F. Forsterling & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Theorien und Anwendungen der Attributionsforschung (pp. 27-54). Bern: Huber.
10.
Fiedler, K. , Semin, G.R., & Finkenauer, C. (1993b). The battle of words between gender groups: A language-based approach to intergroup processes. Human Communication Research, 19, 409-441.
11.
Fiedler, K. , Semin, G.R., Finkenauer, C., Schuldig, S., & Berkel, I. (1995). Actor-observer bias in close relationships: The role of self-knowledge and self-related language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 525-538.
12.
Fiedler, K. , Semin, G.R., & Koppetsch, C. (1991). Language use and attributional biases in close personal relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 147-155.
13.
Fiedler, K. , & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
14.
Franco, F.M. , & Maass, A. (1996). Implicit versus explicit strategies of outgroup discrimination: The role of intentional control in biased language use and reward allocation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 335-359.
15.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & N.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Hamilton, D.L. , Gibbons, P.A., Stroessner, S.J., & Sherman, J.W. (1992). Stereotypes and language use. In G.R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 79-101). London: Sage.
17.
Hilton, D. (1990). Conversational processes and causal attribution. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65-81.
18.
Jones, E.E. , & Nisbett, R.E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79-94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
19.
Karpinski, A. , & von Hippel, W. (1996). The role of the linguistic intergroup bias in expectancy maintenance. Social Cognition, 14, 141-163.
20.
Maass, A. , & Arcuri, L. (1992). The role of language in the persistence of stereotypes. In G.R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 129-143). London: Sage.
21.
Maass, A. , & Arcuri, L. (1996). Language and stereotyping. In N. Macrae, M. Hewstone, & C. Stangor (Eds.), The foundations of stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 76-104). New York: Guilford.
22.
Maass, A. , Corvino, G., & Arcuri, L. (1994). Linguistic intergroup bias and the mass media. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, 31-43.
23.
Maass, A. , Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
24.
Maass, A. , Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G.R. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
25.
Mühlhäusler, P. , & Harré, R. (1990). Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell
26.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
27.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1995). Natural order: Why social psychologists should study (a constructed version of) natural language, and why they have not done so. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 216-222.
28.
Rubini, M. , & Kruglanski, A.W. (1997). Brief encounters ending in estrangement: Motivated language use and interpersonal rapport in the question-answer paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1047-1060.
29.
Rubini, M. , & Semin, G.R. (1994). Language use in the context of congruent and incongruent in-group behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 355-362.
30.
Schmid, J. , & Fiedler, K. (1996). Language and implicit attributions in the Nuremberg Trials: Analyzing prosecutors' and defense attourneys' closing speeches. Human Communication Research, 22, 371-398.
31.
Schmid, J. , & Fiedler, K. (1999). The backbone of closing speeches: The impact of prosecution versus defense language on juridical attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1140-1172.
32.
Semin, G.R. (1995). Interfacing language and social cognition. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 182-194.
33.
Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
34.
Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1989). Relocating attributional phenomena within a language-cognition interface: The case of actors' and observers' perspectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 491-508.
35.
Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications, and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Chichester: Wiley.
36.
Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs. In G.R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58-78). London: Sage.
37.
Semin, G.R. , & Marsman, G. (1994). On the information mediated by interpersonal verbs: Event precipitation, dispositional inference, and implicit causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 836-849.
38.
Skowronski, N.J. , & Carlston, D.E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
39.
Turnbull, W. , & Slugoski, B.R. (1988). Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In D.J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 66-93). New York: New York University Press.
40.
van Dijk, T.A. (1988). Communicating racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Webster, D.M. , Kruglanski, A.W., & Pattison, D.A. (1997). Motivated language use in intergroup contexts: Need-for-closure effects on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1122-1131.
