Elucidation vs Pseudo-Explanation in Psychology: A Response to Professor Wetherick

Abstract

Our response to Professor Wetherick (1999) encompasses some issues beyond the purview of his contribution, but which we believe are relevant to a serious appraisal of his comments on our original paper on J.J. Gibson (Sharrock & Coulter, 1998). In our view, Wetherick perists in the conflation of conceptual and empirical questions, presenting a more complex `solution' to the Gibsonian problem which we had attempted not to solve but to dissolve. Therefore, we are led to treat his constructive proposals in the same way as we did those of Gibson, namely as misplaced attempts to theorize about the nature of human visual capacities. We contest his appeal to the concept of an `object' in his theorizing about vision. Moreover, we note that Wetherick assumes as fact a point which we seriously contested in our original paper: the causal role of the retinal image in human vision.

Keywords

ordinary language perception retinal image scientism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jost, J.T. , & Gustafson, D.F. (1998). Wittgenstein's problem and the methods of psychology: How `grammar' depends on facts. Theory & Psychology, 8(4), 463-479.

Maraun, M.D. (1998a). Measurement as a normative practice: Implications of Wittgenstein's philosophy for measurement in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 8(4), 435-461.

Maraun, M.D. (1998b). Response: The nexus misconceived-Wittgenstein made silly. Theory & Psychology, 8(4), 489-501.

Shanker, S.G. (1998). Wittgenstein's remarks on the foundations of AI. New York: Rout-ledge.

Sharrock, W. , & Coulter, J. (1998). On what we can see. Theory & Psychology, 8(2), 147-164.

Ter Hark, M. (1990). Beyond the inner and the outer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Wetherick, N.E. (1999). On what Gibson (and the rest of us) cannot do without: Comment on Sharrock & Coulter (1998). Theory & Psychology, 9(4), 551-556.