Common to social constructionists and cognitive linguists is a retreat from the ontological issues of subjective experience to a combination of pragmatism and nominalism. What's gained is escape from conundrums of subjective experience; what's lost is psychological realities and self-determination. The postmodern bonus offer is to join with others in checking our observations of actions and functions. Take the offer and you can show, but not own, agency. My argument is, `That's not agency.'
Allport, F. (1955). Theories of perception and the concept of structure. New York: Wiley.
2.
Arendt, H. (1967). The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH: Meridian. (Original work published 1958.)
3.
Fisher, H. (1995). Whose right is it to define the self?Theory & Psychology, 5, 323-352.
4.
Fisher, H. (1998a). Where is the semiotic dimension in a categorial model of metaphor and analogy? Manuscript.
5.
Fisher, H. (1998b). Metonymy, metaphor, and category: Logic versus semantics. Semiotica, 121 (1/2), 41-87.
6.
Gergen, K. (1997). The place of the psyche in a constructed world. Theory & Psychology, 7, 723-746.
7.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Sorry, I'm not myself today. In G. Falconnier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 91-123). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Pereira, A. (1998, February 1). Re: Consciousness and the Self. PSYCHE Discussion Forum <PSYCHE-D@LISTSERV.UH.EDU>.
9.
Popper, K.R. , & Eccles, J.C. (1981). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer.
10.
Webster's new collegiate dictionary. (1973). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
