Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

According to the standard model of perception, the brain is a Turing Machine; its software matches `mental representations' of the outside world with its reflections on the retina. According to more recent computational models, the brain computes retinal images; `mental representations' are superfluous. According to the new biological theory of perception (Calvin, 1989; Edelman, 1989, 1992), the brain needs neither `mental representations' nor retinal images; it is a different digital computer, or Darwin Machine, which unconsciously perceives objects as they are -three-dimensional, colored and moving-because during the process of ontogenesis neuronal populations are selected by the environment to respond to the lines of different orientation, movement and color, and thereafter continue to do so habitually. The destructive part of this paper traces theoretical foundations of computational models of perception and demonstrates why they cannot explain human perception. The constructive part sketches a theory of human perception which utilizes the ontogenetic selection to explain recognition as the multimodal perception and only form of consciousness common to the mammalian brain. Contrary to common opinion, recognition is fully accounted for by the brain's analogues of gestalts; what needs to be explained is how the human brain shifts to unimodal perception and then to perceiving a single aspect/feature.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angier, N. (1992, 27 March). Nerve tissue generated from the brain cells of mice. The New York Times, pp. Al, A18.

Aristotle (1988). In D. J. Herrmann & R. Chaffin (Eds.), Memory in historical perspective (pp. 56-74). New York: Springer.

Austin, J.L. (1962). Sense and sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.

Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Calvin, W.H. (1989). The cerebral symphony. New York: Bantam.

Charniak, E.A. (1977). A framed painting: The representation of a common sense fragment. Cognitive Science, 1, 355-394.

DeJong, G.F. (1977). Skimming newspaper stories by computer (Technical Rep. No. 104). New Haven, CT: Yale University Department of Computer Science.

Dennet, D.C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Edelman, G.M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire. New York: Basic Books.

10.

Edelman, G.M. (1989). The remembered present. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Edelman, G.M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Einstein, A. (1954). Ideas and opinions ( C. Seelig , Ed. and S. Bargmann, Trans. and rev.). New York: Bonanza Books. (Original work published 1953.)

13.

Gazzaniga, M.S. (1992). Nature's mind. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Hubel, D.H. (1988). Eye, vision and brain. New York: Freeman

15.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Vols I, II. New York: Holt.

16.

Kandel, E.R. , & Spencer, W.A. (1968). Cellular neurophysiological approaches in the study of learning. Physiological Reviews, 48, 65-134.

17.

Kosslyn, S.M. , & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet mind. New York: Free Press.

18.

Larrabee, M.G. , & Bronk, D.W. (1947). Prolonged facilitation of synaptic excitation in sympathetic ganglia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 10, 139-154.

19.

Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Merzenich, M.M. , Kaas, J.H. , Wall, J. , Nelson, R.J. , & Sur, M. (1983a). Topographic reorganization of somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 in adult monkey following restricted deafferentation. Neuroscience, 8(1), 33-55.

21.

Merzenich, M.M. , Kaas, J.H. , Wall, J. , Nelson, R.J. , & Sur, M. (1983b). Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys. Neuroscience, 10(3), 639-665.

22.

Merzenich, M.M. , et al. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224(4), 591-605.

23.

Minsky, M.A. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.

24.

Nickerson, R.S. , & Adams, M.J. (1979). Long-term memory for a common object. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 287-307.

25.

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.

26.

Plato (1988). In D. J. Herrmann & R. Chaffin (Eds.), Memory in historical perspective (pp. 25-55). New York: Springer.

27.

Purves, D. (1988). Body and brain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Purves, D. (1994). Neuronal activity and the growth of the brain. New York: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Purves, D. , & White, L.E. (1994). Monocular preferences in binocular viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 8339-8342.

30.

Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

31.

Ritchey, L. (1992). Recognizing a penny. Unpublished research paper, St Francis College, Research Seminar, Loretto, PA.

32.

Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain. New York: Oxford University Press

33.

Schank, R.C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Searle, J.R. (1984). Minds, brains and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

35.

Searle, J.R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Shapiro, Y. (1989). Critical review of the literature on neuronal plasticity as related to mechanisms of learning and memory. Unpublished qualifying paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

37.

Shapiro, Y. (1991). Towards a neuropsychological theory of human memory. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-06B, 3279.

38.

Shapiro, Y. (1993). The perceiving brain: Turing's Machine or Darwin's Machine? Whose brain? Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Perception and Action, Vancouver, Canada.

39.

Shapiro, Y. (1994). The brain's storage of information: Science or science fiction? Abstracts Society for Neuroscience 24th Annual Meeting (88.3).

40.

Shapiro, Y. (1995). On what there is to the residual sensory process (Summary). American Psychological Society 7th Annual Convention Program (VII-32).

41.

Teyler, T.J. , & DiScenna, P. (1987). Long-term potentiation. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 10, 131-161.

The Perceiving Brain

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References