Sacks's lectures are the historical foundation of conversation analysis (CA), the empirical study of talk as social activity. Sacks developed the implications of his analyses mostly for social science. This review highlights various implications for psychology, and especially for studies of language, cognition and social interaction. Sacks's `social action' rather than `communication' approach to talk, including his notion of `subversion', contradicts common assumptions that CA is inherently consensualist. His legacy provides a challenge to psychological theories of discourse and cultural knowledge, and a rigorous empirical methodology for developing it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Boden, D. , & Zimmerman, D. (Eds.). (1991). Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
Bogen, D. , & Lynch, M. (1989). Taking account of the hostile native: Plausible deniability and the production of conventional history in the Iran-Contra hearings. Social Problems, 36(3), 197-224.
4.
Bruner, J.S. (1983). Child's talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Churchland, P.M. (1988). Matter and consciousness: A contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind (rev. ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
Drew, P. , & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Drew, P. , & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398-417.
8.
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1(4), 515-542.
9.
Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(3), 211-247.
10.
Edwards, D. , & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
11.
Edwards, D. , & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23-41.
12.
Furnham, A.F. (1988). Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.
13.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Garfinkel, H. , & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J.C. McKinney & E. Tiryakin (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 338-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15.
Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.
16.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
18.
Lock, A.J. (Ed.). (1978). Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language. London: Academic Press.
19.
Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
20.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
21.
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor-a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324). Cambridge: CUP.
22.
Sacks, H. (1973). On some puns with some intimations. In R.W. Shuy (Ed.), Report of the 32nd annual round table on linguistics and language studies (pp. 135-144). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
23.
Sacks, H. (1975). Everyone has to lie. In B. Blount & M. Sanches (Eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use (pp. 57-80). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Sacks, H. (1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 249-270). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Sacks, H. (1979). Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 7-14). New York: Irvington.
26.
Sacks, H. (1980). Button button who's got the button? In D. Zimmerman & C. West (Eds.), Special issue on language and social interaction. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 318-327.
27.
Sacks, H. (1984). On doing `being ordinary'. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413-429). Cambridge: CUP.
28.
Sacks, H. (1985). The inference-making machine: Notes on observability. In T.A. Van Dijk (Ed.), A handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. 3: Discourse and dialogue (pp. 13-22). London: Academic Press.
29.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54-69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
30.
Sacks, H. (1989). Transcribed lectures 1964-1965. Edited by G. Jefferson, with an introduc-tion by E. Schegloff. Special issue of Human Studies, 12(3-4), 183-404.
31.
Sacks, H. , & Schegloff, E.A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington.
32.
Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
33.
Schank, R.C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Schank, R.C. , & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Schegloff, E.A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345.
36.
Semin, G.R. , & Gergen, K.J. (Eds.). (1990). Everyday understanding: Social and scientific implications. London: Sage.
37.
Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38.
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
40.
Widdicombe, S. , & Wooffitt, R. (1990). 'Being' versus `doing' punk (etc.): On achieving authenticity as a member. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 257-277.
41.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
42.
Wooffitt, R. (1991). 'I was just doing X... when Y': Some inferential properties of a device in accounts of paranormal experiences. Text, 11, 267-288.
