The history of psychology tends to be accorded a purely pedagogical role within the discipline rather than being seen as a possible source of substantive contributions. This reflects a type of mobilization of tradition that is characteristic of the natural rather than the human sciences. The shallow history of the scientific review helps to organize consensus while critical history represents a threat to the moral community of researchers. However, there are developments which provide a more favourable context for critical historical scholarship. These include: the emergence of a somewhat disenchanted view of science; the rise of feminist scholarship; and the international diversification of psychology. The potential effects of critical historical studies on conceptions of the subject-matter of psychology, on the understanding of its practices and on the nature of its social contribution are briefly discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adair, J.G. (1992). What is an indigenous psychology? Insights from operationalizing its measurement. Paper presented at the International Congress of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July, Liege, Belgium.
2.
Antaki, C. , & Leudar, I. (1992). From attribution to argumentation: The case of disappearing discourse. Canadian Psychology, 33, 594-599.
3.
Ardila, R. (1982). International psychology. American Psychologist, 37, 323-329.
4.
Ash, M.G. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. In L. Graham, W. Lepenies, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories (pp. 143-189). Dordrecht/Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
5.
Ash, M.G. (1985). Gestalt psychology: Origins in Germany and reception in the United States. In C. Buxton (Ed.), Points of view in the modern history of psychology (pp. 295-344). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Ash, M.G. (1992). Cultural contexts and scientific change in psychology: Kurt Lewin in Iowa. American Psychologist, 47, 198-207.
7.
Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.
8.
Blumenthal, A.L. (1977). Wilhelm Wundt and early American psychology: A clash of two cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 291, 13-20.
9.
Boring, E.G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10.
Brock, A. (1993). Something old, something new: The `reappraisal' of Wilhelm Wundt in textbooks. Theory & Psychology, 3, 235-242.
11.
Bulhan, H.A. (1985). Frantz Fanon and the psychology of oppression. New York: Plenum.
12.
Church, A.T. (1987). Personality research in a non-western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 272-292.
13.
Danziger, K. (1990a). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Danziger, K. (1990b). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D.E. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 331-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Danziger, K. (1991). Introduction to special issue. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 327-333.
16.
Danziger, K. (1992). The project of an experimental social psychology: Historical perspectives. Science in Context, 5, 309-328.
17.
Danziger, K. (1993). Psychological objects, practice, and history. In P.J. van Strien & H. van Rappard (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 15-47). New York: Plenum.
18.
Daston, L. (1992). The naturalized female intellect. Science in Context, 5, 209-236.
19.
Dehue, T. (1991). Transforming psychology in the Netherlands I: Why methodology changes. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 335-349.
20.
Forman, P. (1991). Independence, not transcendence, for the historian of science. Isis, 82, 71-86.
21.
Furomoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. In I.S. Cohen (Ed.), G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 9, pp. 5-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
Gergen, K.J. (1991). Emerging challenges for theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 1, 13-36.
23.
Gergen, K.J. , & Gergen, M. (Eds.). (1984). Historical social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Geuter, U. (1992). The professionalization of psychology in Nazi Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modern sciences. New York: Routledge.
26.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Henle, M. (1980). The influence of Gestalt psychology in America. In R.W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 177-190). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Hilgard, E.R. , Leary, D.E., & McGuire, G.R. (1991). The history of psychology: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 79-107.
29.
Hubner, K. (1983). Critique of scientific reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Joravsky, D. (1989). Russian psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
31.
Jordanova, L.J. (1980). Natural facts: A historical perspective on science and sexuality. In C. MacCormack & M. Strathern (Eds.), Nature, culture and gender (pp. 42-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Keller, E. Fox (1983). A feeling for the organism. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
33.
Klemm, G.O. (1914). A history of psychology. New York: Scribner.
34.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Lagmay, A.V. (1984). Western psychology in the Philippines: Impact and response. International Journal of Psychology, 19, 31-44.
36.
MacLeod, R.B. (1975). The persistent problems of psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
37.
Markus, G. (1987). Why is there no hermeneutics of natural sciences? Some preliminary theses. Science in Context, 1, 5-51.
38.
Moghaddam, F.M. (1987). Psychology in the three worlds as reflected by the crisis in social psychology and the move toward indigenous Third-World psychology. American Psychologist, 42, 912-920.
39.
Moghaddam, F.M. (1990). Modulative and generative orientations in psychology: Implications for psychology in the three worlds. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 21-41.
40.
Morawski, J.G. (1987). After reflection: Psychologists' uses of history. In H.J. Stam, T.B. Rogers, & K.J. Gergen (Eds.), The analysis of psychological theory: Metapsychological perspectives (pp. 157-173). New York: Hemisphere.
41.
Morawski, J.G. (1988). Impossible experiments and social constructions: The social bases of psychologists' work. In J.G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 72-93). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
Morawski, J.G. (1990). Toward the unimagined: Feminism and epistemology in psychology. In R.T. Hare-Mustin & J. Maracek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 150-179). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Morawski, J.G. (1992). Self-regard and other-regard: Reflexive practices in American psychology, 1890-1940. Science in Context, 5, 281-308.
44.
Murphy, G. (1929). Historical introduction to modern psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
45.
Nelson, L.H. (1990). Who knows: From Quine to a feminist empiricism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
46.
Nickles, T. (1991). Philosophy of science and history of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the History of Science Society, Madison, WI.
47.
Pickering, A. (Ed.). (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Pillsbury, W.B. (1929). The history of psychology. New York: Norton.
49.
Rieber, R.W. (Ed.). (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and the making of a scientific psychology. New York: Plenum.
50.
Rosenberg, C. (1983). Science in American society: A generation of historical debate. Isis, 74, 356-367.
51.
Rosenzweig, M.R. (1984). US psychology and world psychology. American Psychologist, 39, 877-884.
52.
Sampson E.E. (1991). The democraticization of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 1, 275-298.
53.
Schabas, M. (1992). Breaking away: History of economics as history of science. History of Economics, 24, 187-203.
54.
Sexton, V.S. , & Hogan, J.D. (Eds.). (1992). International psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
55.
Sherif, C.W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In J. Sherman & E.T. Beck (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93-133). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
56.
Sinha, D. (1986). Psychology in a Third World country: The Indian experience. Beverley Hills, CA/New Delhi: Sage.
57.
Sloan, T.S. (1990). Psychology for the third world?Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20.
58.
Staeuble, I. (1991). 'Psychological man' and human subjectivity in historical perspective. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 417-432.
59.
Staeuble, I. (1993). History and the psychological imagination. In P.J van Strien & H. van Rappard (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 85-117). New York: Plenum.
60.
van Strien, P.J. (1991). Transforming psychology in the Netherlands II: Audiences, alliances and the dynamics of change. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 351-369.
61.
van Strien, P.J. (1993). The creative tension between distance and commitment in the historiography of one's own discipline. Psychologie und Geschichte, 4, 163-177.
62.
Watson, R.I. (1967). Psychology: A prescriptive science. American Psychologist, 22, 435-443.
63.
Woodward, W.R. (1980). Toward a critical historiography of psychology. In J. Brozek & L.J. Pongratz (Eds.), Historiography of modern psychology. Gottingen/Toronto: Hogrefe.
64.
Young, R.M. (1966). Scholarship in the behavioural sciences. History of Science, 5, 1-51.
