This paper has two broad themes. The first concerns two approaches that discourse analysis might take toward the understanding of `uncertainty'. First, the study of `discursive uncertainty' can trace the ways that people linguistically convey and deploy their relative uncertainty in social interaction. Second, the examination of `discourse of uncertainty' can show how discourses represent certain physical, social and institutional loci as containing or generating uncertainty. Both of these are illustrated with examples drawn from the sociology of scientific knowledge. After a summary introduction to the postmodern condition which emphasizes, in particular, the historically specific `decentring' of the individual, the second broad theme is addressed, namely the impact of postmodernity upon these relations of discourse to uncertainty. With regard to discursive uncertainty, it is suggested that, with the postmodern fragmentation of the individual, uncertainty cannot fulfil its traditional social functions of mediating consensus or persuasion. Postmoderns are likely to represent uncertainty as shifting from specific external loci to the self. A possible consequence of this is the disabling of political action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, P. (1983). In the tracks of historical materialism. London: Verso.
2.
Ashmore, M. (1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Bains, G. (1983). Explanation and the need to control. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory (pp. 126-143). Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Barnes, B. (1977). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5.
Baudrillard, J. (1983a). The ecstasy of communication. In H. Foster (Ed.), The anti-aesthetic: Essays in postmodern culture (pp. 126-134). Port Townsend, WA: Bay Press.
6.
Baudrillard, J. (1983b). Simulations. New York: Semiotext(e).
7.
Baudrillard, J. (1983c). In the shadow of silent majorities.. .or the end of the social and other essays. New York: Semiotext(e).
8.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
9.
Benedict, R. (1935). Patterns of culture. London: Routledge.
10.
Berger, P.L. , & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage.
13.
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14.
Campbell, B.L. (1985). Uncertainty as symbolic action in disputes amongst experts. Social Studies of Science, 15, 429-453.
15.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on attribution theory. In J.H. Harvey, W.J. Ickes, & R.F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone.
17.
Deleuze, G. , & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone.
18.
Doran, C. (1989). Jumping frames: Reflexivity and recursion in the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 19, 515-531.
19.
Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. New York: Pantheon.
20.
Douglas, M. (1985). Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
Eiser, J.R. (1983). Attribution theory and social cognition. In J. Jaspers, F.D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 91-113). London: Academic Press.
22.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
23.
Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer culture and postmodernism. London: Sage.
24.
Fischoff, B. , Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S.L., & Keeney, R.L. (1981). Acceptable risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Forsyth, D.R. (1980). The functions of attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 184-189.
26.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
27.
Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality (Vol. I). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
28.
Furby, L. (1979). Individualistic bias in locus of control. In A.R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 169-190). New York: Irvington.
29.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
Gergen, K.J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
31.
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
32.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.
33.
Gilbert, G.N. , & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35.
Harré, R. (1981). Expressive aspects of descriptions of others. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behaviour (pp. 139-156). London: Academic Press.
36.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
38.
Held, D. (1980). Introduction to critical theory. London: Hutchinson.
39.
Henriques, J. , Hollway, W., Unwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
40.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
41.
Jardine, A.A. (1985). Gynesis: Configurations of women and modernity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
Johnson, B.B. (1987). The environmental movement and grid/group analysis: A modest critique. In B.V. Covello and B.B. Johnson (Eds.), The social and cultural construction of risk (pp. 147-175). Dordrecht: Reidel.
43.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
44.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
45.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143-157.
46.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 193-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
47.
Kelley, H.H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
48.
Knorr-Cetina, K.D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
49.
Kruglanski, A.W. , & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1-44.
50.
Lalljee, M. , & Abelson, R.P. (1983). The organization of explanation. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory (pp. 65-80). Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Lash, S. (1988). Discourse or figure? Postmodernism as a `regime of signification'. Theory, Culture & Society, 5, 311-336.
52.
Lash, S. , & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organized capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
53.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow engineers in society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
54.
Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Latour, B. , & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
56.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. London: Routledge.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
60.
Martin, B. (1981). A sociology of contemporary cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
61.
Martin, L.H. , Gutman, H., & Hutton, P.H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self. London: Tavistock.
62.
Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads cf the present. London: Hutchinson Radius.
63.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.
64.
Michael, M. (1989). Attribution and ordinary explanation: Cognitivist predilections and pragmatist alternatives. New Ideas in Psychology, 7, 231-243.
65.
Michael, M. (1991). Some postmodern reflections on social psychology. Theory & Psychology, 1(2), 203-221.
66.
Moscovoci, S. (1981). On social representations. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Social cognition (pp. 181-209). London: Academic Press.
67.
Moscovoci, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Moscovici, S. , & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanation: From naive to amateur scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory (pp. 98-125). Oxford: Blackwell.
69.
Mulkay, M. (1985). The word and the world. London: Allen & Unwin.
70.
Nietzsche, F.W. (1956). Birth of tragedy, and the genealogy of morals. New York: Doubleday. (Original work published 1871.)
71.
Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics. London: Routledge.
72.
Potter, J. , & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
73.
Rayner, S. (1986). Management of radiation hazards in hospitals. Social Studies of Science, 16, 573-591.
74.
Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
75.
Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
76.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul. London: Routledge.
77.
Schwarz, M. , & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
78.
Shotter, J. , & Gergen, K.J. (Eds.). (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.
79.
Smithson, M. (1985). Towards a social theory of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15, 151-172.
80.
Smithson, M. (1989). Ignorance and uncertainty: Emerging paradigms. New York: Springer.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207-232.
83.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
84.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgements of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty (pp. 84-98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
86.
Yearley, S. (1988). Science, technology and social change. London: Unwin Hyman.
87.
Yearley, S. (1991). The Green case. London: HarperCollins.
