The concept of rationality has its roots in a historic philosophical conception of human beings as creatures of reason. To act on the basis of reason is to act on the basis of reasons, which in turn implies a process of reasoning. An objectivist conception of rationality sees its essence as lying in the use of reasoning processes that conform to appropriate logical norms. A subjectivist conception of rationality sees its essence in the subjective appeal to reasons. It is argued that neither approach alone is adequate. Rationality is best viewed as metasubjective objectivity. That is, the standards that embody rationality's objective component are not externally imposed rules that circumvent subjectivity. Rather, they are internally constructed via active reflection on one's subjectivity. Psychological evidence on the development of metasubjectivity is interpreted as consistent with the present approach. Implications for theory and research, and for educational and psychotherapeutic practice, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1989). Thinking skills curricula: Their promise and progress. Educational Psychologist, 24, 25-77.
2.
Astington, J.W. , Harris, P.L., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1988). Developing theories of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Baron, J.B. , & Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.). (1987). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York: Freeman.
4.
Beck, A.T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
5.
Beilin, H. (1992). Piaget's new theory. In H. Beilin & P.B. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 1-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Bickhard, M.H. (1991). A pre-logical model of rationality. In L.P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 68-77). New York: Springer.
7.
Boole, G. (1854). An investigation of the laws of thought, on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. London: Walton & Maberly.
Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of intellectual development. In H. Beilin & P.B. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 61-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Chandler, M. , Boyes, M., & Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 370-395.
11.
Ellis, A. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational-emotive therapy. In A. Ellis & R. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 3-34). New York: Springer.
12.
Evans, J. St B.T. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 451-468.
13.
Evans, J. St B.T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Evans, J. St B.T. (1991). Theories of human reasoning: The fragmented state of the art. Theory & Psychology, 1(1), 83-105.
15.
Flavell, J.H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
16.
Flavell, J.H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In H. Beilin & P.B. Pufall (Eds.), Piaget's theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 107-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Flavell, J.H. , Green, F.L., & Flavell, E.R. (1990). Developmental changes in young children's knowledge about the mind. Cognitive Development, 5, 1-27.
18.
Kitchener, K.S. , King, P.M., Wood, P.K., & Davison, M.L. (1989). Sequentiality and consistency in the development of reflective judgment: A six-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 73-95.
19.
Klahr, D. (1984). Transition processes in quantitative development. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 101-139). New York: Freeman.
20.
Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
21.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Kuhn, D. , Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Lanning, K. (1987). Some reasons for distinguishing between `non-normative response' and `irrational decision'. Journal of Psychology, 121, 109-117.
24.
Lehrer, K. (1990). Metamind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
Lopes, L.L. (1991). The rhetoric of irrationality. Theory & Psychology, 1(1), 65-82.
26.
Markovits, H. , & Vachon, R. (1989). Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 398-412.
27.
Moshman, D. (1990a). The development of metalogical understanding. In W.F. Overton (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives (pp. 205-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Moshman, D. (1990b). Rationality as a goal of education. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 335-364.
29.
Moshman, D. (1994). Reasoning, metareasoning, and the promotion of rationality. In A. Demetriou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Intelligence, mind, and reasoning: Structure and development. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30.
Moshman, D. , & Franks, B.A. (1986). Development of the concept of inferential validity. Child Development, 57, 153-165.
31.
Moshman, D. , & Hoover, L.M. (1989). Rationality as a goal of psychotherapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3, 31-51.
32.
Moshman, D. , & Lukin, L.E. (1989). The creative construction of rationality: A paradox? In J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning, & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 183-198). New York: Plenum.
33.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
O'Neill, D.K. , & Gopnik, A. (1991). Young children's ability to identify the sources of their beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 27, 390-397.
35.
Osherson, D.N. , & Markman, E. (1975). Language and the ability to evaluate contradictions and tautologies. Cognition, 3, 213-226.
36.
Overton, W.F. (1990). Competence and procedures: Constraints on the development of logical reasoning. In W.F. Overton (Ed.), Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives (pp. 1-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
Perner, J. , & Davies, G. (1991). Understanding the mind as an active information processor: Do young children have a `copy theory of mind'?Cognition, 39, 51-69.
38.
Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children (Margaret Cook, Trans.). New York: Norton.
39.
Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures (Terrance Brown, & Kishore Julian Thampy, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
Pillow, B.H. (1988). The development of children's beliefs about the mental world. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 1-32.
41.
Rescher, N. (1988). Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Rips, L.J. (1990). Reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 321-353.
43.
Russell, J. , & Haworth, H.M. (1987). Perceiving the logical status of sentences. Cognition, 27, 73-96.
44.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. London: Routledge.
45.
Sodian, B. , & Wimmer, H. (1987). Children's understanding of inference as a source of knowledge. Child Development, 58, 424-433.
46.
Sodian, B. , Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753-766.
47.
Stich, S. (1990). The fragmentation of reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ward, S.L. , & Overton, W.F. (1990). Semantic familiarity, relevance, and the development of deductive reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 26, 488-493.
