Abstract
Current critiques of developmental theory impugn all walks of cognitive and empirical psychology. They show that we must undergo a fundamental `renegotiation of our common language habits' as psychologists (Valsiner, p. 149). My difference with Valsiner is over how fundamental this renegotiation should be. He believes that psychologists simply `lack adequate concepts' to capture the phenomena that interest them. I argue that the deficiencies of contemporary psychology, illustrated in my critique of the `theory of mind' approach to children's thinking, must be righted by generating a new psychological poetic that refuses the aggrandizing consolations of the psychological sublime. Only this new poetic would realize the revolutionary destiny that Miller (1969) foresaw for our discipline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.