The paper discusses the pros and cons of inductive research methods. It is argued that, despite the profusion of good arguments against this scientific strategy, it is frequently employed, for example in psychology. A case probe taken from the realm of cognitive psychology is used as an illustration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacon, F. (1931). Novum organum (B. Montagu, Ed.). London: Pickering. (Original work published 1620.)
2.
Reprinted from Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 1738, 5, 175-192.
3.
Braithwaite, R.B. (1932-33). The nature of believing. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 33, 129-146.
4.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Einhorn, H.J. , & Hogarth, R.M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88.
6.
Fodor, J. (1981). Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Gardenfors, P. , & Sahlin, N.-E. (1983). Decision making with unreliable probabilities. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 36, 240-251.
8.
Gardenfors, P. , & Sahlin, N.-E. (Eds.). (1988). Decision, probability, and utility: Selected readings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Hallden, S. (1983). Behovs detfforflutna. Stockholm: Liber.
11.
Hansson, B. (1975). The appropriateness of the expected utility model. Erkenntnis, 9, 175-193.
12.
Hansson, B. (1982). Some reflections on the aims and scope of epistemology. In T. Pauli (Ed.), <320311> (pp. 106-118), Uppsala University, Department of Philosophy.
13.
Hansson, B. (1988). Risk aversion as a problem of conjoint measurement. In P. Gardenfors & N.-E. Sahlin (Eds.), Decision, probability, and utility: Selected readings (pp. 136-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature (L.A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739-40.)
15.
Jeffrey, R.C. (1983). The logic of decision (2nd rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1965.)
16.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
17.
Lopes, L.L. (1991). The rhetoric of irrationality. Theory & Pyschology, 1(1), 65-82.
18.
McCollum, E.V. (1957). A history of nutrition. Boston: The Riverside Press.
19.
Nickerson, C.A. , & McClelland, G.H. (1989). Across-persons versus within-persons tests of expectancy-value models: A methodological note. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 261-270.
20.
O'Connor, D.J. , & Carr, B. (1982). Introduction to the theory of knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.
21.
Ramsey, F.P. (1990). General propositions and causality. In D.H. Mellor (Ed.), Philosophical papers (pp. 145-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work written 1929.)
22.
Sahlin, N.-E. (1988). The significance of empirical evidence for developments in the foundations of decision theory. In D. Batens & J.P. van Bendegem (Eds.), Theory and experiment (pp. 103-121). Dordrecht: Reidel.
23.
Sahlin, N.-E. (1990). The philosophy of F.P. Ramsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Sjoback, H. (1988). The Freudian learning hypotheses. Lund: Lund University Press.
25.
Underwood, B.J. (1957). Psychological research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
