Metaphysical pluralism is examined as a proposed explanation for theoretical indeterminacy in psychology and found wanting. A more promising view is that indeterminacy is caused by a methodological inadequacy that can be overcome by a revised understanding of abstraction in theory construction. The revision involves a genetic or historical approach to concept formation that reveals the concrete interrelations among qualities so that they can be ordered with respect to deductive priority.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cohen, M.R. , & Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
2.
Dixon, R.A. , & Nesselroade, J.R. (1983). Pluralism and correlational analysis in developmental psychology: Historical commonalities. In R. Lerner (Ed.), Developmental psychology: Historical and philosophical perspectives (pp. 113-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
English, H.B. , & English, A.C. (1958). A comprehensive dictionary of psychological and psychoanalytic terms. New York: Longmans, Green.
4.
Gergen, K.J. (1981). The meager voice of empiricist affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 333-337.
5.
Gulyga, A. (1985). Immanuel Kant. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
6.
Hilgard, E.R. , & Bower, G.H. (1966). Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7.
Holzkamp, K. (1978). Die Uberwindung der wissenschaftlichen Beliebigkeit psychologischer Theorien durch die Kritische Psychologie. In K. Holzkamp, Gesellschaftlichkeit des Individuums (pp. 129-201). Cologne: Pahl-Rugenstein.
8.
Ilyenkov, E.V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
9.
Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 36, 257-269.
10.
Lorenz, K. (1950). The comparative method in studying innate behaviour patterns. In Symposia of the society for experimental biology, no. IV (pp. 221-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Lorenz, K. (1964). Evolution and modification of behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Narlikar, J.V. (1988). The primeval universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Novikoff, A.B. (1945). The concept of integrative levels and biology. Science, 101, 209-215.
15.
Rose, S. , Kamin, L.J., & Lewontin, R.C. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
16.
Selsam, H. , & Martel, H. (1963). Reader in Marxist philosophy. New York: International Publishers.
17.
Tolman, C.W. (1987a). Theories of mental evolution in comparative psychology: Darwin to Watson. In E. Tobach (Ed.), Historical perspectives and the international status of comparative psychology (pp. 15-23). New York: Erlbaum.
18.
Tolman, C.W. (1987b). Zur Vorgeschichte der historischen Herangehensweise in der burgerlichen Psychologie. In W. Maiers & M. Markard (Eds.), Kritische Psychologie als Subjektwissenschaft (pp. 228-240). Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
19.
Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Wertheimer, M. (1972). Fundamental issues in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
