The popularity of the `biases and heuristics' literature is examined critically in terms of the rhetorical factors that have mediated widely published claims that human judgment abilities are poor and even irrational. The logic of the original experiments is examined as well as the factors that cause that logic to be ambiguous and the implications of the experiments to be misrepresented. Questionable use of evaluative language in scientific articles and secondary gains to outside authors who spread the bias message are also examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bar-Hillel, M. (1973). On the subjective probability of compound events. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 396-406.
2.
Abbreviated from a chapter appearing in M. Bazerman and R. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Berkeley, D. , & Humphreys, P. (1982). Structuring decision problems and the `bias heuristic'. Acta Psychologica, 50, 201-252.
4.
Christensen-Szalanski, J.J.J. , & Beach, L.R. (1984). The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. American Psychologist, 39, 75-78.
5.
Fischhoff, B. , Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552-564.
6.
Gigerenzer, G. (in press). On cognitive illusions and rationality. In E. Eells & T. Maruszewski (Eds.), Rationality and reasoning: Essays in honor of L.J. Cohen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
7.
Gigerenzer, G. , Hell, W., & Blank, H. (1988). Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 513-525.
8.
Gigerenzer, G. , & Murray, D.J. (1987). Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Gigerenzer, G. , Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of chance. New York: Cambridge.
10.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
11.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
12.
Lopes, L.L. (1981). Decision making in the short run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 377-385.
13.
Lopes, L.L. (1982). Doing the impossible: A note on induction and the experience of randomness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 626-636.
14.
Lopes, L.L. , & Oden, G.C. (1987). Distinguishing between random and nonrandom events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 392-400.
15.
Lopes, L.L. , & Oden, G.C. (in press). The rationality of intelligence. In E. Eells & T. Maruszewski (Eds.), Rationality and reasoning: Essays in honor of L.J. Cohen. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
16.
McCormick, J. (1987 August 17). The wisdom of Solomon. Newsweek, pp. 62-63.
17.
Peterson, C.R. , & Beach, L.R. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 29-46.
