Jean Piaget developed his constructivist theory from an epistemological and psychological perspective to understand the development of logical-mathematical knowledge. Aiming to extend the research program inherited from his thought, this work delineates the various types of objects in the social domain that have been investigated from this perspective in recent decades, with a focus on analyzing social representations as objects of knowledge. Based on available evidence, we argue that studying the psychogenesis of some abstract social objects is, in most cases, equivalent to studying the ontogenesis process of social representations. Then we delimit the characteristic features of both the object of knowledge and the psychosocial subject, as well as the constructive interaction between them. In this vein, we provide reasons and evidence supporting the potential of dialectical inferential processes to explain the reconstruction of collective meanings awaiting appropriation by individuals within their culture. Finally, we emphasize that in this ontogenetic process, the subject’s constructive activity is directed towards the social representations available within their social group. Hence, the Piagetian thesis on critical realism does not allow us to interpret this ontogenetic process, as the validity of a social representation does not depend on its degree of proximity to the real object but only on social consensus.
BarreiroA. (2013). The appropriation process of the belief in a just world. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9246-y
2.
BarreiroA. (2021). Social representations of justice as developing structures. In Prado de SouzaC.Serrano OswaldS. E. (Eds.), Social representations for the Anthropocene: Latin American perspectives (pp. 125–144). Springer.
3.
BarreiroA. (2024). La polifasia cognitiva en los procesos de construcción del conocimiento social. Relaciones entre la psicología genética y la psicología social [Cognitive polyphasia in the processes of social knowledge construction. Relations between genetic psychology and social psychology]. In BarreiroA.CarreteroM. (Eds.), Construcción de conocimientos en el campo psicológico. Celebrando a Tono Castorina I (pp. 175–195). Tilde.
4.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A. (2015). La creencia en un mundo justo como trasfondo ideológico de la representación social de la justicia [Belief in a just world as an ideological background to the social representation of justice]. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 24(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v24n2.44294
5.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A. (2016). Nothingness as the dark side of social representations. In BangJ.Winther-LindqvistD. (Eds.), Nothingness: Philosophical insights into psychology (pp. 69–88). Transaction Publishers.
6.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A. (2017). Dialectical inferences in the ontogenesis of social representations. Theory & Psychology, 27(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316681863
7.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A.CarreteroM. (2026). Rethinking social knowledge from a genetic psychology perspective. In PsaltisC. & B. Wagoner (Eds.), Conflict and change: Integrating social and developmental psychology (pp. 343–363). Cambridge University Press.
8.
BarreiroA.WainrybC.CarreteroM. (2016). Narratives about the past and cognitive polyphasia: Remembering the Argentine “Conquest of the Desert”. Peace & Conflict, 22(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000150
9.
BecerraG.CastorinaJ. C. (2024). La objetividad en la perspectiva sistémico-constructivista [Objectivity in the systemic-constructivist perspective]. In Rodriguez ZoyaL. G. (Ed.), Rolando García y los sistemas complejos [Rolando García and complex systems] (pp. 165–191). Editora Latinoamericana.
10.
BethE. W.PiagetJ. (1961). Épistémologie, mathématiques et psychologie. Essai sur les relations entre la logique formelle et la pensée réelle [Epistemology, mathematics, and psychology. An essay on the relationship between formal logic and real thinking]. Presses Universitaires de France.
11.
BronckartJ. P. (2007). Desarrollo del lenguaje y didáctica de las lenguas [Language development and teaching methods of languages]. Miño & Dávila.
12.
CampbellT. (2010). Justice. Macmillan Education.
13.
CastorinaJ. A. (1989). La posición del objeto en el desarrollo del conocimiento [The position of the object in the development of knowledge]. In CastorinaJ. A.Dibar UreC.AisembergB.PalauG.ColinvauxD. (Eds.), Problemas en psicología fenética (pp. 37–62). Miño & Dávila.
14.
CastorinaJ. A. (2010). The ontogenesis of social representations: A dialectic perspective. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 18.1–18.19.
15.
CastorinaJ. A. (2017). Relationships between revisited genetic psychology and the social representations theory. A critical analysis. Papers on Social Representations, 26(1), 5.1–5.23.
16.
CastorinaJ. A.BaqueroR. (2005). Dialéctica y psicología del desarrollo [Dialectics and developmental psychology]. Amorrortu.
17.
CastorinaJ. A.BarreiroA. (2023). The development of social knowledge. Towards a cultural-individual dialectic. Information Age Publishing.
18.
CastorinaJ. A.FaigenbaumG. (2003). The epistemological meaning of constraints in the development of domain knowledge. Theory & Psychology, 12(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012003013
19.
De AlbaM.FraïsséC.DargentasM. (2022). Représentations sociales des espaces de vie [Social representation of living spaces]. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
20.
DuveenG. (1998). The psychosocial production of ideas: Social representations and psychology. Culture & Psychology, 4(4), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400402
21.
DuveenG. (2013). Social life and the epistemic subject. In MoscoviciS.JovchelovitchS.WagonerB. (Eds.), Development as social process: Contributions of Gerard Duveen (pp. 67–89). Routledge.
22.
DuveenG.De RosaA. (1992). Social representations and the genesis of social knowledge. Ongoing production on social representations – Productions vives sur les représentations sociales, 1(2–3), 94–108.
23.
DuveenG.PsaltisC. (2008). The constructive role of asymmetry in social interaction. In MuellerU.CarpendaleJ. I.BudwigN.SokolB. (Eds.), Social life and social knowledge (pp. 183–204). Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
FaigenbaumG. (2005). Children’s economic experience. Exchange, reciprocity, and value. Libros.
25.
FerreiroE. (1996a). Aplicar, replicar, recrear. Acerca de las dificultades inherentes a la incorporación de nuevos objetos al cuerpo teórico de la teoría de Piaget [Applying, replicating, recreating. On the difficulties inherent to the incorporation of new objects into the theoretical body of Piaget’s theory]. Substratum, 3, 8–9.
26.
FerreiroE. (1996b). La adquisición de los objetos culturales: el caso particular de la lengua escrita [The acquisition of cultural objects: The particular case of written language]. In FerreiroE. (Ed.), Vigencia de Jean Piaget [Validity of Jean Piaget] (pp. 9–19). Siglo XXI.
27.
FerreiroE. (1996c) Acerca de la necesaria coordinación entre semejanzas y diferencias [On the necessary coordination between similarities and differences]. In CastorinaJ. A.FerreiroE.Kohl de OliveiraM.LernerD. (Eds.), Piaget y Vigostky: Contribuciones para replantear el debate (pp. 119–139). Paidós.
28.
FerreiroE. (2012). The discovery of a Piagetian child in literacy development. In MartiE.RodriguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 171–186). Transaction Publishers.
29.
GarcíaR. (2001). El conocimiento en construcción [Knowledge in construction]. Gedisa.
30.
JodeletD. (2017). A representação do corpo e suas transformações [The representation of the body and its transformations]. In JodeletD. (Ed.), Representações sociais e mundos de vida (pp. 272–292). Fundação Carlos Chagas. (Original work published 1984)
31.
JodeletD. (1991). L’idéologie dans l’étude des représentations sociales [Ideology in the study of social representation]. In AebicherV.DeconchyJ. P.LipianskiE. M. (Eds.), Idéologies et représentations sociales (pp. 15–33). Delval.
32.
JodeletD. (2008). El movimiento de retorno al sujeto y el enfoque de las representaciones sociales [The back-to-subject movement and the social representations approach]. Cultura y Representaciones Sociales, 3(5), 32–63.
33.
JodeletD. (2011). Aportes del enfoque de las representaciones sociales al campo de la educación. [Contributions of the social representations approach to the educational field]. Espacios en Blanco, 21, 133–154.
34.
JovchelovitchS.Priego-HernándezJ. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In SammutG.AndreouliE.GaskellG.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 163–178). Cambridge University Press.
35.
KalampalikisN.ApostolidisT. (2021). Challenges for social representations theory: The sociogenetic perspective. In PapatamouS.MolinerP. (Eds.), Serge Moscovici’s work (pp. 23–34). Editions des archives contemporaines.
36.
KitchenerR. F. (2009). On the concept(s) of the social in Piaget. In MüllerU.CarpendaleJ. I. M.SmithL. (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 110–131). Cambridge University Press.
37.
LemanP. J.DuveenG. (1996). Developmental differences in children’s understanding of epistemic authority. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(5), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199609)26:5<683::AID-EJSP779>3.0.CO;2-R.
38.
LenziA.CastorinaJ. A. (2001). Algunas reflexiones sobre una investigación psicogenética en conocimientos sociales: La noción de autoridad escolar [Some reflections on psychogenetic research in social knowledge: The notion of school authority]. In CastorinaJ. A.LenziA. (Eds.), La formación de los conocimientos sociales en los niños (pp. 41–58). Gedisa.
39.
LloydB.DuveenG. (1990). A semiotic analysis of the development of social representations of gender. In DuveenG.LloydB. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 27–46). Cambridge University Press.
40.
MarkováI. (2008). The epistemological significance of the social representations theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 38(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00382.x
41.
MarkováI. (2010). Gerard Duveen on the epistemology of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 19, 4.1–4.9.
42.
MartiE. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente. La adquisición infantil de los sistemas externos de representación [Representing the world externally. Infantile acquisition of external systems of representation]. Antonio Machado.
43.
MartíE. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic action to external systems of representation. In MartiE.RodriguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151–170). Transaction Publishers.
44.
MartíE.RodríguezC. (2012). After Piaget. Transaction Publishers.
45.
MoscoviciS. (1961). La psychanalyse son image et son public [Psychoanalysis, its image and its public]. Press Universitaires de France.
46.
MoscoviciS. (1990). Social psychology and developmental psychology: Extending the conversation. In DuveenG.LloydB. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 164–185). Cambridge University Press.
47.
MoscoviciS. (2001). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. New York University Press.
48.
MugnyG.PérezJ. A. (1989). Psicología social del desarrollo cognitivo [Social psychology of cognitive development]. Anthoropos.
49.
MüllerU.CarpendalleJ.SmithL. (2009). Introduction: Overview. In MüllerU.CarpendalleJ.SmithL. (Eds), Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 1–44). Cambridge University Press.
50.
OvertonW. (1994). Contexts of meaning: The computational and the embodied mind. In OvertonW.PalermoD. S. (Eds.), The nature and ontogenesis of meaning (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
Perret-ClermontA. N. (1980). Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London Academic Press.
53.
Perret-ClermontA. N.NicoletM. (1988). Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif [Interacting and knowing. Social dynamics and regulations in cognitive development]. Delval.
54.
PiagetJ. (1968). Le langage et la pensée chez l’enfant [Language and thought in children]. Delachoux & Niestlé. (Original work published 1923)
55.
PiagetJ. (1971). El criterio moral en el niño [Moral judgment in the child]. Fontanella. (Original work published 1932)
56.
PiagetJ. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
57.
PiagetJ. (1977). Sociological studies. Routledge. (Original work published 1965)
58.
PiagetJ. (1980). Les formes élémentaires de la dialectique [The elementary forms of dialectics]. Gallimard.
59.
PiagetJ. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)
60.
PiagetJ. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Psychology Press. (Original work published 1977)
61.
PiagetJ.GarcíaR. (1982). Psicogénesis e historia de la ciencia [Psychogenesis and history of science]. Siglo XXI.
62.
PiagetJ.WeilA. M. (1951). The development in children of the idea of homeland and of relations with other countries. International Social Sciences Bulletin, 3(3), 561–578.
63.
PsaltisC. (2012). Social representations of gender in peer interaction and cognitive development. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(11), 840–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00466.x
64.
PsaltisC. (2015). Genetic social psychology: From microgenesis to ontogenesis, sociogenesis . . . and back. In PsaltisC.GillespieA.Perret-ClermontA. N. (Eds.), Social relations in human and societal development (pp. 71–94). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
65.
PsaltisC.DuveenG.Perret-ClermontA. N. (2009). The social and the psychological: Structure and context in intellectual development. Human Development, 52(5), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1159/000233261
66.
PsaltisC.GillespieA.Perret-ClermontA.-N. (2015). Social relations in human and societal development. Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
PsaltisC.WagonerB. (2026). Conflict and change: Integrating social and develpmental psychology. Cambridge University Press.
68.
PsaltisC.ZapitiA. (2014). Interaction, communication and development: Psychological development as a social process. Routledge.
69.
RodríguezC. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In MartiE.RodriguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 123–150). Transaction Publishers.
70.
SmithL. (1977). Introduction to Piaget’s sociological studies. In PiagetJ. (Ed.), Sociological studies (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
71.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.
72.
TurielE. (2008). The development of children’s orientations toward moral, social, and personal orders: More than a sequence in development. Human Development, 51, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113154
73.
WagnerW. (1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400302
74.
WagnerW. (2015). Representation in action. In SammutG.AndreouliE.GaskellG.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 12–28). Cambridge University Press.
75.
WagnerW.KelloK.RämmerA. (2018). Making social objects: The theory of social representation. In RosaA.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 130–147). Cambridge University Press.
