Since the 19th century, psychometrics has found false hope in reconstructions of thermometry’s history, as if the former’s failure to investigate whether psychological attributes are quantitative finds justification in the way understandings of temperature unfolded. Since David Sherry’s contribution, a number of psychologists have revived this old chestnut, so there may be merit in discussing the issues raised. First, that of temperature’s quantitative structure is considered. Second, the place of measurement theory is discussed. And third, the role of pragmatism and abductive inference is analysed. It is concluded that thermometry holds lessons for psychometrics; lessons not wanted but needed.
AndersonJ. (2008). Lectures on modern philosophy Hume, Reid and James 1932–35. Sydney University Press.
2.
ArnulfJ. K.OlssonU. H.NimonK. (2024). Measuring the menu, not the food: “Psychometric” data may instead measure “lingometrics” (and miss its greatest potential). Frontiers of Psychology, 15, 1308098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.20241308098
3.
BarnettM. (1956). The development of thermometry and the temperature concept. Osiris, 12, 269–341.
4.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
5.
BorsboomD. (2005). Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BriggsD. C. (2022). Historical and conceptual foundations of measurement in the human sciences: Credos and controversies. Routledge.
7.
BringmannL. F.EronenM. I. (2015). Heating up the measurement debate: What psychologists can learn from the history of physics. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315617253
8.
BrooksG. P.AaltoS. K. (1991). The rise and fall of moral algebra: Francis Hutcheson and the mathematization of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198107)17:3<343
9.
CaesarJ. (2015). The Gallic wars (translated by W. A.McDevitteW. S.Bohn). Roman Roads Media.
10.
CarnapR. (1966). An introduction to the philosophy of science. Basic Books.
ChangH. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford University Press.
13.
ChoppinB. H. L. (1985). Lessons for psychometrics from thermometry. Evaluation in Education, 9(1), 9–12.
14.
ClagettM. (1968). Nicole Oresme and the medieval geometry of qualities and motions. University of Wisconsin Press.
15.
CohenM. R. (1931). Reason and nature: An essay on the meaning of scientific method. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
16.
CohenM. R.NagelE. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. Routledge.
17.
CrombieA. C. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition: The history of argument and explanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts (Vol. 1). Duckworth.
18.
CromerA. (1993). Uncommon sense: The heretical nature of science. Oxford University Press.
19.
CronbachL. J.MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
20.
CrossR. (1998). The physics of Duns Scotus: The scientific context of a theological vision. Clarendon Press.
21.
DavyH. (1812). Elements of chemical philosophy. Johnson & Co.
22.
De VosD. (1999). Rogier van der Weyden: The complete works. Harry N. Abrams.
23.
DeW HoweM. (1941) Holmes-Pollock letters, The correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock (Vol. 2). Harvard University Press.
24.
EbelR. L.FrisbieD. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement. Prentice Hall.
25.
EllisB. (1966). Basic concepts of measurement. Cambridge.
FranzD. J. (2022). “Are psychological attributes quantitative?” is not an empirical question: Conceptual confusions in the measurement debate. Theory and Psychology, 32(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211045340
29.
GaltonF. (1865). Hereditary talent and character, Part 2. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12, 318–327.
30.
GaltonF. (1877). Address to the anthropological department of the British Association. William Clowes.
GuyonH.KopJ.-L.JuhelJ.FalissardB. (2018). Measurement, ontology, and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism. Theory & Psychology, 28(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318761606
33.
HaigB. (2014). Investigating the psychological world: Scientific method in the behavioral sciences. MIT Press.
34.
HeathT. L. (1908). The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements, volume 2. Cambridge University Press.
35.
HempelC. G. (1952). Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. University of Chicago Press.
36.
HölderO. (1901). Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass [The axioms of quantity and the theory of measurement]. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematisch-Physische Klasse, 53, 1–46.
37.
JamesW. (1896). The will to believe. The New World, 5, 327–347.
38.
JamesW. (1905). Humanism and truth once more. Mind, 14(54), 190–198.
39.
KempS. (2018). Quantification of virtue in late medieval Europe. History of Psychology, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000077
40.
KrantzD. H.LuceR. D.SuppesP.TverskyA. (1971). Foundations of measurement: Vol.1. Academic Press.
41.
KyburgH. E. (1984). Theory and measurement. Cambridge University Press.
42.
KyngdonA.RichardsB. (2007). Attitudes, order and quantity: Deterministic and direct probabilistic tests of unidimensional unfolding. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(1), 1–34.
43.
LearJ. (1965). Kepler’s dream (containing Kepler’s Somnium translated by P.Kirkwood). University of California Press.
LuceR. D.TukeyJ. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X
MackieJ. L. (1973). Truth, probability and paradox: Studies in philosophical logic. Clarendon Press.
48.
MahdavinejadM.JavanrudiK. (2012). Assessment of ancient fridges: A sustainable method to storage ice in hot-arid climates. Asian Culture and History, 4(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.5539/ach.v4n2p133
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
52.
McKeonR. (1941). The basic works of Aristotle. Random House.
53.
McMullinE. (1992). The inference that makes science. Marquette University Press.
54.
McNeillJ. T.GamerH. M. (1938). Medieval handbooks of penance. Columbia University Press.
55.
MendellH. (2007). Two traces of two-step Eudoxan proportion theory in Aristotle, with a moral. Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences, 61, 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-006-0114-8
56.
MichellJ. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Erlbaum.
57.
MichellJ. (1993). Numbers, ratios, and structural relations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(3), 325–332.
58.
MichellJ. (1994). Measuring dimensions of belief by unidimensional unfolding. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 244–273. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1994.1016
MichellJ. (2007). Representational theory of measurement. In BoumansM. (Ed.), Measurement in economics: A handbook (pp. 19–39). Academic Press.
64.
MichellJ. (2009). Invalidity in validity. In LissitzR. W. (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 111–133). Information Age Publishing.
65.
MichellJ. (2012). “The constantly recurring argument”: Inferring quantity from order. Theory & Psychology, 22, 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311434656
MichellJ. (2021). Representational measurement theory: Is its number up?Theory & Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/101177/0959354320930817
68.
MichellJ. (2022). “The art of imposing measurement upon the mind”: Sir Francis Galton and the genesis of the psychometric paradigm. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211017671
69.
MichellJ. (2023). “Professor Spearman has drawn over-hasty conclusions”: Unravelling psychometrics’ “Copernican Revolution”. Theory & Psychology, 33(5), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231179446
70.
MichellJ. (2025). The mystery of the missing psychometric corpus. (Under review, Philosophy of the Social Sciences).
71.
MisakC. (2000). Peirce. In Newton-SmithW. H. (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 335–339). Blackwell.
72.
MundyB. (1987). The metaphysics of quantity. Philosophical Studies, 51, 29–54.
NarensL. (1985). Abstract measurement theory. MIT Press.
77.
NetzR. (2022). A new history of Greek mathematics. Cambridge.
78.
NewsteadA. G. J. (2001). Aristotle and modern mathematical theories of the continuum. In Sfendoni-MentzouD.HattiangadiJ.JohnsonD. M. (Eds.), Aristotle and contemporary science (pp. 113–129). Peter Lang.
PedersenO. (1974). Early physics and astronomy: A historical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
82.
RichardsonK. (2022). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
83.
RocheJ. J. (1998). The mathematics of measurement: A critical history. Athlone.
84.
RollerD. (1957). The early development of the concepts of temperature and heat. In ConantJ. B. (Ed.), Harvard case histories in experimental science (Vol. 1, pp. 119–213). Harvard University Press.
85.
RussellB. (1903). Principles of mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
86.
RussellB. (1910). Philosophical essays. Longmans, Green, and Co.
87.
SebeokT. (1981). You know my method. In SebeokT. (Ed.), The play of musement (pp. 17–52). Indiana University Press.
SherryD. (2011). Thermoscopes, thermometers, and the foundations of measurement. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.07.001
90.
SijtsmaK.EllisJ. L.BorsboomD. (2024). Recognize the value of the sum score, psychometrics’ greatest accomplishment. Psychometrika, 89(1), 84–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09964-7
91.
SoltaniG.NazariA.GhanavatiN. (2012). Energy management in Iranian maintainable ancient architecture: Introducing ice houses and cisterns in Yazd City. Canadian Journal on Environmental, Construction and Civil Engineering, 3(4), 173–178.
92.
SpearmanC. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
93.
SpriggeT. L. S. (1997). James, aboutness, and his British critics. In PutnamR. A. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to William James (pp. 125–144). Cambridge University Press.
94.
SteinH. (1990). Eudoxus and Dedekind: On the ancient Greek theory of ratios and its relation to modern mathematics. Synthese, 84, 163–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00485377
ThorndikeE. L. (1918). The nature, purposes, and general methods of measurements of educational products. In WhippleG. M. (Ed.), Seventeenth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Vol. 2, pp. 16–24). Public School Publishing.
103.
TitchenerE. B. (1905). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice. Vol. II: quantitative experiments. Part II: instructor’s manual. Macmillan.
104.
Torres IrribarraD. (2021). A pragmatic perspective of measurement. Springer.
105.
VealR.LeitchV. (2019). Fuel and fire in the ancient Roman world: Towards an integrated economic understanding. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
106.
VilarM. (2017). The hedonistic calculus in the Renaissance. Viator, 48(2), 305–322.
von HelmholtzH. (1887). An epistemological analysis of counting and measurement. An essay contributed to the Festschrift honoring Eduard Zeller in 1887 (KahlR. Trans.). In KahlR. (Ed.), Selected writings of Hermann von Helmholtz (pp. 437–465). Wesleyan University Press.
109.
WestbrookR. (2008). The pragmatist family romance. In MisakC. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American philosophy (pp. 185–196). Oxford University Press.
110.
WhiteheadA. N.RussellB. (1913). Principia mathematica, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press.
111.
WijsenL. D.BorsboomD. (2021). Perspectives on psychometrics interviews with 20 past psychometric society presidents. Psychometrika, 86(1), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09752-7
112.
WiseM. W. (1995). The values of precision. Princeton University Press.
113.
WolpertL. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. Faber & Faber.
