Concerns about the epistemological unity of psychology may be attributed to the plurality of outlooks and methods, as well as to an ostensible gap between scientific psychology and professional practice. Such a gap threatens the identity of psychology and also hinders the adequate development of its practical dimension. Scientific psychology mainly adopts a naturalistic outlook and calls for a subpersonal account of psychological phenomena. Opponents of such an approach to psychology maintain that human events have unique features and call for a personalistic account of them. The adoption of an approach underscoring the centrality of personhood—that acknowledges the specificity of the personal domain—may bridge the gap between science and practice, promoting the feasibility of practical psychology.
BeckA. T.EmeryG. (with GreenbergR. L.). (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. Basic Books.
2.
BennettM. R.HackerP. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell.
3.
BerdiniG.De BerardinisD.MasinaE.MazzottaM.OrgianaC.RubinoA.TavazzaG. (1992). Immagine del lavoro dello psicologo clinico [The representation of clinical psychologists’ work]. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 2(2), 212–237.
4.
BermudezJ. L. (2005). Philosophy of psychology: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
5.
BlackburnS. (2005). Oxford dictionary of philosophy (2nd rev. ed.). Oxford University Press.
6.
BühlerK. (1927). Die krise der psychologie [The crisis of psychology]. Fischer.
CorradiniA. (1989). Semantica della preferenza e decisione etica [Semantics of preference and ethical decisions]. Franco Angeli.
9.
CorradiniA. (2017). La frammentazione della psicologia: Alcune riflessioni epistemologiche [Fragmentation in psychology: Some critical remarks]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, XLIV(3), 565–568. https://doi.org/1421/88358
10.
CorradiniA.Lo DicoG.GajN. (2018, July4–6). Two issues about theory and data in the psychological sciences [Paper presentation]. VIIème Congrès de la Sociètè de Philosophie des Sciences, Nantes, France.
11.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In HeathertonT. F.WeinbergerJ. L. (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21–40). American Psychological Association.
DraysonZ. (2017). Psychology, personal and subpersonal. In CraigE. (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-V044-1
19.
Driver-LinnE. (2003). Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists’ use of Kuhn. American Psychologist, 58(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.269
20.
ErdelyiM. H. (1988). Psychoanalysis: Freud’s cognitive psychology. W. H. Freeman and Company.
21.
FeserE. (2005). Philosophy of mind. Oneworld Publications.
22.
GajN. (2016). Unity and fragmentation in psychology: The philosophical and methodological roots of the discipline. Routledge.
23.
GajN. (2018). Psychology between science and technology: A proposal for the development of a theory of practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 28(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000081
24.
GoertzenJ. R. (2008). On the possibility of unification: The reality and nature of the crisis in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 18(6), 829–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308097260
25.
GrassoM.ConeseP.FucilliG. (1997). Competenze psicologico cliniche e contesti operativi nei Servizi Socio-sanitari: Un’indagine sulla rappresentazione della cultura professionale degli psicologi clinici del territorio di Bari [Clinical psychological competences and operational contexts in social-health services: An inquiry around the representations of clinical psychologists’ professional culture in the Bari area]. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1, 87–132.
26.
HempelC. G. (1969). Logical positivism and the social sciences. In AchinsteinP.BarkerS. F. (Eds.), The legacy of logical positivism (pp. 229–257). Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
HempelC. G. (2001a). Explanation and prediction by covering laws. In FetzerJ. H. (Ed.), The philosophy of C. G. Hempel (pp. 69–76). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1961–62)
28.
HempelC. G. (2001b). Explanation in science and history. In FetzerJ. H. (Ed.), The philosophy of C. G. Hempel (pp. 276–296). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1962)
29.
HempelC. G. (2001c). Scientific rationality: Normative vs. descriptive construals. In FetzerJ. H. (Ed.), The philosophy of C. G. Hempel (pp. 358–371). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1979)
30.
HempelC. G. (2001d). Valuation and objectivity in science. In FetzerJ. H. (Ed.), The philosophy of C. G. Hempel (pp. 372–295). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1983)
HenriquesG. R. (2016). Teaching clinical decision making. In MagnavitaJ. J. (Ed.), Clinical decision making in mental health practice (pp. 273–307). American Psychological Association.
33.
HenriquesG. R. (2017). Character adaptation systems theory: A new big five for personality and psychotherapy. Review of General Psychology, 21(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000097
34.
HenriquesG. R.SternbergR. J. (2004). Unified professional psychology: Implications for the combined-integrated model of doctoral training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(10), 1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20034
35.
JonesD.ElcockJ. (2001). History and theories of psychology: A critical perspective. Hodder Education.
36.
KelloggS. H.YoungJ. W. (2008). Cognitive therapy. In LebowJ. L. (Ed.), Twenty-first century psychotherapies: Contemporary approaches to theory and practice (pp. 43–79). John Wiley & Sons.
37.
KochS. (1959). Psychology: A study of science (Vols. 1–3). McGraw Hill.
38.
KossoP. (1992). Reading the book of nature: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Cambridge University Press.
LamiellJ. T. (2010b). William Stern (1871–1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. PABST Science.
41.
LeaheyT. H. (1992). A history of psychology. Prentice Hall.
42.
LegrenziP.MalagutiD.UmiltàC. (2017). Formazione universitaria e professioni: Il caso peculiare della psicologia [University education and professions: The peculiar case of psychology]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, XLIV(3), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1421/88351
43.
LonginoH. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
44.
LundinR. W. (1996). Theories and systems of psychology (5th ed.). D.C. Heath and Company.
45.
MachadoA.LourençoO.SilvaF. J. (2000). Facts, concepts, theories: The shape of psychology’s epistemic triangle. Behavior and Philosophy, 28(1–2), 1–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27759402?seq=1
46.
MagnussonD. (1992). Back to the phenomena: Theories, methods, and statistics in psychological research. European Journal of Personality, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060102
47.
MalatoD.MasielloS.NiccolucciC.NuovoM.RaffaeleA.VerrientiD. (1993). Psicologi in formazione: alla ricerca di una competenza [Psychologists in training: Looking for competence]. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1(1), 98–109.
48.
McBurneyD. H.WhiteT. L. (2007). Research methods. Wadsworth.
49.
MeehlP. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. University of Minnesota Press.
50.
MichellJ. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Psychology Press.
51.
NagelE. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Hackett.
52.
NelsonH. G.StoltermanE. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
53.
NorcrossJ. C. (2005). A primer on psychotherapy integration. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 3–23). Oxford University Press.
54.
NorcrossJ. C.KarpiakC. P.SantoroS. O. (2005). Clinical psychologists across the years: The division of clinical psychology from 1960 to 2003. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(12), 1467–1483. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpl.20135
55.
NormannR. (1984). Service management: Strategy and leadership in service business. Wiley.
56.
O’GradyK. A.SlifeB. D. (2017). A prominent worldview of psychological research. In SlifeB. D.O’GradyK. A.KositsR. D. (Eds.), The hidden worldviews of psychology’s theory, research, and practice (pp. 44–57). Routledge.
57.
Olivetti ManoukianF. (1998). Produrre servizi: Lavorare con oggetti immateriali [Delivering services: Working with immaterial objects]. Il Mulino.
58.
OsbeckL. M. (2019). Values in psychological science: Re-imagining epistemic priorities at a new frontier. Cambridge University Press.
RobinsonD. N. (2000). Paradigms and “the myth of framework”: How science progresses. Theory & Psychology, 10(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300101004
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ. (2014). Outlines of a general psychological theory of psychological intervention. Theory & Psychology, 24(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314524295
64.
SlifeD. B.WilliamsR. N. (1995). What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. SAGE.
65.
StaatsA. W. (1996). Behavior and personality: Psychological behaviorism. Springer.
66.
SternbergR. J. (2005). Unifying the field of psychology. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream? (pp. 3–14). American Psychological Association.
67.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2003). Unified psychology. In KazdinA. E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed.; pp. 23–47). American Psychological Association.
68.
StewartR. E.Wiltsey StirmanS.ChamblessD. L. (2012). A qualitative investigation of practicing psychologists’ attitude toward research-informed practice: Implications for dissemination strategies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025694
69.
TaylorC. (1964). The explanation of behaviour. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
70.
VandenBosG. R. (Ed.). (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
71.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In RiebertR. W. (Ed.), Collected works of Vygotsky (Vol. 3; pp. 233–243). Plenum. (Original work published 1927)
72.
WatsonJ. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428
73.
WenzelA. (2013). Strategic decision making in cognitive behavioral therapy. American Psychological Association.
WilsonJ. L.ArmoutlievE.YakuninaE. (2009). Practicing psychologists’ reflections on evidence-based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(4), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016247
76.
YancharS. C. (1997). Fragmentation in focus: History, integration, and project evaluation. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 17(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091167
77.
YancharS. C.SlifeB. D. (1997). Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.235
