In psychology, where a natural science epistemology holds sway, relationships between the researcher and the researched are usually hierarchical and transactional, bound in procedural and legal ethics. This limited view of ethics fails to account for issues of power and privilege, as well as inequalities in economic and sociocultural structures. We argue for a more complete philosophy of science (and practice) consisting of complementary first principles—relational ethics and epistemology. Valuing relational ethics as a first principle means that how knowledge is produced and acted on is complementary in importance with what knowledge is produced. Collaborative relationships grounded in sincerity, reciprocity, and shared purpose become the basis for how psychological knowledge is produced, disseminated, and acted upon. We present two case studies to show how taking action in an ethical manner through relationships formed in the process of doing psychology deepens our conception and practice of psychology as human science.
BhaskarR. (2008). A realist theory of science. Verso.
4.
Buch-HansenH. (2005). Critical realism in the social sciences: An interview with Roy Bhaskar. Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2005.9672913
5.
CartwrightD. (1979). Contemporary social psychology in historical perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033880
FrankA. (2004). Moral non-fiction: Life writing and children’s disability. In EakinP. J. (Ed.), The ethics of life writing (pp. 174–194). Cornell University Press.
13.
FryerD. (1986). The social psychology of the invisible: An interview with Marie Jahoda. New Ideas in Psychology, 4(1), 107–118.
14.
FryerD.LaingA. (2008). Community psychologies: What are they? What could they be? Why does it matter? A critical community psychology approach. Australian Community Psychologist, 20(2), 7–15.
HakimM. A.MujahidahD. R. (2020). Social context, interpersonal network, and identity dynamics: A social psychological case study of terrorist recidivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12349
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288
21.
JahodaM.ZeiselH. (2002). Marienthal: The sociography of an unemployed community. Transaction.
22.
JiL. J.LeeA.GuoT. (2010). The thinking styles of Chinese people. In BondM. H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155–167). Oxford University Press.
23.
KemmisS.McTaggartR.NixonR. (2013). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer Science & Business Media.
24.
KingP.HodgettsD.RuaM.Te WhetuT. (2016). Emplaced cultural practices through which homeless men can be Māori. In PeterE. J.ChristensenJ. (Eds.), Indigenous homelessness: Perspectives from Canada, Australia and New Zealand (pp. 363–388). University of Manitoba Press.
25.
KüngH. (1997). A global ethic for global politics and economics. Oxford University Press.
26.
LiuJ. H. (2014). What Confucian philosophy means for Chinese and Asian psychology today: Indigenous roots for a psychology of social change. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2014.10
27.
LiuJ. H. (2015). Globalizing indigenous psychology: An East Asian form of hierarchical relationalism with worldwide implications. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12058
28.
LiuJ. H. (2017). Neo-Confucian epistemology and Chinese philosophy: For auctioning psychology as a human science. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 20(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12168
29.
LiuJ. H.Fisher OnarN.WoodwardM. (2014). Symbologies, technologies, and identities: Critical junctures theory and the multi-layered nation-state. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 43, 2–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.08.012
30.
LiuJ. H.KingP. (in press). What is an appropriate philosophy of human science for 21st-century indigenous psychologies? In LudwigD.KoskinenI.MncubeZ.PoliseliL.Reyes-GalindoL. (Eds.), Global epistemologies and philosophies of science. Routledge.
31.
LiuJ. H.LiuS. H. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and neo-Confucian thinking: A critical history of paradigm shifts and values in academic psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 15(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(97)00008-1
32.
LiuJ. H.MacdonaldM. (2016). Towards a psychology of global consciousness through an ethical conception of self in society. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 46(3), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12101
33.
LiuJ. H.WoodwardM. (2013). Towards an indigenous psychology of religious terrorism with global implications: Introduction to AJSP’s special issue on Islamist terrorism in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12025
34.
LiuS. H. (2000). The openness of Confucianism. Global Dialogue; Nicosia, 2(1), 89–98.
35.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
36.
Martín-BaróI. (1996). Writings for a liberation psychology (AronA.CorneS., Eds.). Harvard University Press.
37.
MillaM.Faturochman AncokD. (2013). The impact of leader–follower interactions on the radicalization of terrorists: A case study of the Bali bombers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12007
38.
MillaM. N.HudiyanaJ.ArifinH. H. (2020). Attitude toward rehabilitation as a key predictor for adopting alternative identities in deradicalization programs: An investigation of terrorist detainees’ profiles. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12380
MorelandR. L.LevineJ. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 137–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60297-X
41.
MulukH.SumaktoyoN. G.RuthD. M. (2013). Jihad as justification: National-survey evidence on belief in violent jihad as a mediating factor for sacred violence among Muslims in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12002
42.
MulukH.UmamA. N.MillaM. N. (2020). Insights from a deradicalization program in Indonesian prisons: The potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12392
43.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
44.
OstromE. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American political science association, 1997. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585925
45.
PerkinsD. D.HugheyJ.SpeerP. W. (2002). Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice. Community Development, 33(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490141
46.
PitalokaA.AbidinZ.MillaM. N. (2018). Psikologi Sosial: Pengantar dalam Teori dan Penelitian [Social psychology: An introduction to the theories and research]. Salemba.
47.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
48.
PutraI. E.SukabdiZ. A. (2013). Basic concepts and reasons behind the emergence of religious terror activities in Indonesia: An inside view. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12001
49.
RichersonP.BaldiniR.BellA. V.DempsK.FrostK.HillisV.MathewS.NewtonE. K.NaarN.NewsonL.RossC.SmaldinoP. E.WaringT. M.ZeffermanM. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400106X
50.
SeedatM.DuncanN.LazarusS. (Eds.). (2001). Community psychology: Theory, method and practice. South African and other perspectives. Oxford University Press.
51.
ShroutP. E.RodgersJ. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
52.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. Zed Books.
53.
TebesJ. K.ThaiN. D.MatlinS. L. (2014). Twenty-first century science as a relational process: From Eureka! to team science and a place for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53(3–4), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9625-7
YangK. S. (2000). Monocultural and cross-cultural Indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00067
59.
YustisiaW.ShadiqiM. A.MillaM. N.MulukH. (2020). An investigation of an expanded encapsulate model of social identity in collective action (EMSICA) including perception of threat and intergroup contact to understand support for Islamist terrorism in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12372
