Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It is emphasized that theoretical psychology is based on the practice of theorizing. After presenting and challenging some ideas about theories, three tasks for theoretical psychologists are discussed: theorizing as critique refers to describing psychology as a hyper-science that inflates its methodological and technical activities in order to conceal its lack of a natural–scientific foundation. Theorizing as reconstruction is an activity that seeks to make sense of history, culture, society, power, money, and politics in the development of the discipline and subjectivity. This task also traces the elements that have led to psychology’s difficulties. Theorizing as creation means developing theories that are able to make sense of psychological knowledge. It is suggested that a theory of subjectivity is needed that draws on not only the psychological sciences but also the psychological humanities. Finally, it is argued that theorizing remains a duty of psychological work.

Keywords

critical psychology duty hyper-science subjectivity theorizing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Estrada-Villalta

(2017). Theory from the South: A decolonial approach to the psychology of global inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 37–42. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.031

Barad

K. M.

(2006). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Baudrillard

(1988). Selected writings ( Poster

, Ed. & Intro.). Stanford University Press.

Danziger

(1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press.

Danziger

(1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. SAGE.

Davies

(2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. Verso.

Fine

Ruglis

(2009). Circuits and consequences of dispossession: The racialized realignment of the public sphere for U.S. youth. Transforming Anthropology, 17(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-7466.2009.01037.x

Gigerenzer

(2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033

Holzkamp

(1972). Kritische Psychologie: Vorbereitende Arbeiten [Critical psychology: Preparatory works]. Fischer.

10.

Holzkamp

(1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Laying the foundations for psychology]. Campus.

11.

Johnstone

Boyle

(with Cromby

Dillon

Harper

Kinderman

Longden

Pilgrim

Read

). (2018). The powerthreat meaning framework: Towards the identification of patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubled or troubling behaviour, as an alternative to functional psychiatric diagnosis. British Psychological Society.

12.

Jüttemann

(2011). Historische Psychologie und die Entwicklung der Menschheit: Die Perspektive einer Fundamentaltheorie [Historical psychology and the development of humanity: The perspective of a fundamental theory]. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 22(1), 3–16.

13.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article 4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

14.

Pettit

Hegarty

(2014). Psychology and sexuality in historical time. In Tolman

D. L.

Diamond

L. M.

Bauermeister

J. A.

George

W. H.

Pfaus

J. G.

Ward

L. M.

(Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Vol. 1. Person-based approaches (pp. 63–78). http://doi.org/10.1037/14193-003

15.

Popper

K. R.

(1992). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. (Original work published 1935)

16.

Porter

T. M.

(1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.

17.

Schraube

(2015). Why theory matters: Analytical strategies of critical psychology. Estudos de Psicologia, 32(3), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-166X2015000300018

18.

Teo

(2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. Springer Verlag.

19.

Teo

(2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291. http://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000132

20.

Teo

(2018). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. Palgrave Macmillan.

21.

Woodward

Ash

M. G.

(Eds.). (1982). The problematic science: Psychology in nineteenth-century thought. Praeger.

Theorizing in psychology: From the critique of a hyper-science to conceptualizing subjectivity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References